• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

The Design Delusion

sandwiches

Mas sabe el diablo por viejo que por diablo.
Jun 16, 2009
6,104
124
46
Dallas, Texas
✟29,530.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Ok, I see. I would say this is a difficult argument to get across to the general public, based on the difference in how I interpreted it compared to how you have interpreted it.

I disagree with Dawkins that there is an implicit regression problem at all.

A theist can simply argue that the universe is too complicated to have arisen without divine intervention and then say god has always been so doesn't require a creator.
If bare assertions is all that's needed, then let's make the same assertion about God: God is too complicated to have arisen without natural processes and the universe has always been so it doesn't require a creator. And?

As I can figure it in a purely logical sense, a complex thing does not require a more complex thing. That does NOT imply that NO complex thing requires a more complex thing.
So, if not everything requires a complex creator, we cannot automatically assume that the universe required a creator. And if some things require a creator, then their deity may have had a creator.

Therefore, I do not see a logical inconsistency between man/nature requiring a god and god not requiring a god.

All things considered, I still think Dawkin's choice of this line of argument is poor.
I think it's the fact that theists assign properties ad hoc to their deity without a way to verify. In other words, as I said before, they're bare assertions and anyone can make them. So, if whoever makes the most special pleading wins, then we're in for a long debate.
 
Upvote 0

matthewgar

Newbie
Jun 18, 2010
699
25
powell river BC. Canada.
✟23,465.00
Faith
Marital Status
Private
Politics
CA-Others
Atheist now accepts Intelligent Design (flagella)


Just one example out of thousands.


ehhh....before you embarrass yourself how about reading more then the title, it's a parody, it says so /in the description/. I really wish people on all sides research a video before they go and post it as if it proves something. heh.
 
Upvote 0

BrianOnEarth

Newbie
Feb 9, 2010
538
20
✟23,311.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
I think it's the fact that theists assign properties ad hoc to their deity without a way to verify. In other words, as I said before, they're bare assertions and anyone can make them. So, if whoever makes the most special pleading wins, then we're in for a long debate.
Yes. Conjecture is fun. Believing wholeheartedly in a conjecture without waiting for proof is unwise and neurotic. Turn cognitive brain off in favour of pleasing fantasy.
This wouldn't be so bad if were not for the awful side-effects: bigotry, prejudice, false hope. Also the sometimes terrible burden it places on the individual: just check out the depression section here to see how individuals punish themselves for not meeting god's standards. Mind you, god doesn't even meet god's standards! I was shocked yesterday to find a thread where Christians were recommending to a Christian lady not to date a non-believer because "god says not to". So god is now a bigot too. Good grief!
The sooner people take responsibility for their own attitudes and behaviours the better.
 
Upvote 0

sandwiches

Mas sabe el diablo por viejo que por diablo.
Jun 16, 2009
6,104
124
46
Dallas, Texas
✟29,530.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Yes. Conjecture is fun. Believing wholeheartedly in a conjecture without waiting for proof is unwise and neurotic. Turn cognitive brain off in favour of pleasing fantasy.
This wouldn't be so bad if were not for the awful side-effects: bigotry, prejudice, false hope. Also the sometimes terrible burden it places on the individual: just check out the depression section here to see how individuals punish themselves for not meeting god's standards. Mind you, god doesn't even meet god's standards! I was shocked yesterday to find a thread where Christians were recommending to a Christian lady not to date a non-believer because "god says not to". So god is now a bigot too. Good grief!
The sooner people take responsibility for their own attitudes and behaviours the better.

Not to derail this thread but I decided to take a look at the depression forum and it broke my heart to see so many sad and depressed people. As I type this, I still have a knot in my throat.

This lady with degenerative disc disease made me tear up a bit. I hope we can find more and better treatments for peoples' ailments, including depression. That forum is truly heartbreaking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wiccan_Child
Upvote 0