Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, i just dont trust things that are uncertain and subject to change.
Then you can have no use for science of any kind, not just the theory of evolution. All scientific theories are held provisionally, pending new discoveries.No, i just dont trust things that are uncertain and subject to change.
Now you just contradicted yourself since GPS depends on the theory of gravity. And yes, by the way that you abuse the word proven evolution over millions of years has been shown to be a fact far beyond a reasonable doubt. That you do not understand how this has been done is your fault alone.Even a blind squirrel can find a nut once in a while. However, GPS is proven to work, no one has proven millions of years of evolution however, because its uncertain and subject to change.
That is a flaw on your part.No, i just dont trust things that are uncertain and subject to change.
Abandoned altogether? It doesnt sound very factual at all.It explains all of the facts we have at present very well. But we can never be certain whether new facts will come to light which will require that the currently accepted theory be modified or abandoned altogether.
Gravity can be observed, evolution cannot.Now you just contradicted yourself since GPS depends on the theory of gravity. And yes, by the way that you abuse the word proven evolution over millions of years has been shown to be a fact far beyond a reasonable doubt. That you do not understand how this has been done is your fault alone.
Once again, the theory is subject to change, just as the theory of gravity is subject to change. The facts remain.
No, its wise.That is a flaw on your part.
Oh my! So wrong. We can observe it at several different levels. You do not understand what observation is.Gravity can be observed, evolution cannot.
You should no better than that. And if you don't it is a pity.No, its wise.
Just to be clear, you are speaking of the fact of evolution, not the theory. Is that correct?Gravity can be observed, evolution cannot.
Just to be clear, you are speaking of the fact of evolution, not the theory. Is that correct?
That it has not been observed that life on Earth has changed and diversified since it began.
That it has not been observed that species which once existed are no longer alive.
That it has not been observed that there are species alive now which have not always existed.
That is not a flaw. It does not matter how many times it is said.
If its uncertain and subject to change its not a fact. A fact is proven true, you yourself say parts of evolution can be wrong.
Selective reading appears to be a creationist defense mechanism.Come on, you obviously read at least some of my post, it’s not that difficult to grasp...
“ In science, theories never become facts. Rather, theories explain facts.”
Go read Job 41. Is that "less wordy.... than a novel"?The way of writing religious manuscript less wordy and different from novel. If that is hard to comprehend, then think of the difference between words in a engineering text and a marketing ad.
Bamboo would be a closer word to describe the barrel of the tank or armour vehicle. Is the barrel so huge and thick like a tree trunk? Most tree trunks have branches too except BAMBOO or coconut tree.
See your own limitations with words. The bible say it better than you, so don't say how it should say stuff to suit you. It is readers who have to comprehend it, not criticise that it lacks details.
The way of writing religious manuscript less wordy and different from novel. If that is hard to comprehend, then think of the difference between words in a engineering text and a marketing ad.
As for God harden Pharaoh's heart, let me copy abd paste from another earlier post of mine six months ago.
So did you actually observe the origin of mankind evolve over time? Nope.Evolution is observed. We observe changes in populations of organisms over time.
That's what biological evolution is.
So what? The scientific method does not require that we observe the entire process in order to conclude that it very likely happened.So did you actually observe the origin of mankind evolve over time? Nope.
Very likely a scientific fantasy.So what? The scientific method does not require that we observe the entire process in order to conclude that it very likely happened.
This is a poorly worded post on your part, but we can observe evolution through the fossil record.So did you actually observe the origin of mankind evolve over time? Nope.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?