• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

The definition of EMBEDDED AGE

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,634
52,516
Guam
✟5,128,741.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So says the biblical author of Genesis who was not an eyewitness.

Um --- try the book of Job; and it was God, Himself speaking --- Who was there:

Job 38:1-7 said:

1 ¶ Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said,
2 Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge?
3 Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer thou me.
4 ¶ Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
5 Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it?
6 Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof;
7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?
 
Upvote 0

sbvera13

Senior Member
Mar 6, 2007
1,914
182
✟25,490.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
In Relationship
Completely failing to notice that according to God, the earth has cornerstones.

Now, it looks rather obvious to me that god is using metaphorical language to put Job in his place, and not literally describing the physical structure of the earth. Which now puts us in the place of admitting that god uses metaphorical language. *cough*Genesis*cough*

So, either everything in the bible is literal, and the earth has corners, or god uses metaphorical language, and thus the bible, including genesis, need not be taken literally. Thanks for pointing that verse out to me. I like it.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Maturity without history.

Keep in mind:
  1. Only God can do it.
  2. It is an act of omnipotence - not science - and therefore cannot be verified.
  3. Since it cannot be verified, documentation would be necessary for clarification.

I can understand that when it comes to Adam, and trees in the garden, and rocks. I have some trouble when it comes to the fossil record, and some things. Do you think He placed fossils in there that never really lived??
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,634
52,516
Guam
✟5,128,741.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Do you think He placed fossils in there that never really lived??

Nope --- I do believe He tidied up after the Flood though, and could have had a reason for putting things where they are, and in the order we find them.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Nope --- I do believe He tidied up after the Flood though, and could have had a reason for putting things where they are, and in the order we find them.

Well, I am not trying to attack your concepts here. They just are not clear to me. God tidied up?? Howso? How did that impact the order of fossils?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,634
52,516
Guam
✟5,128,741.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Well, I am not trying to attack your concepts here.

No problem, bro --- lay it on me if you think I'm wrong. :D

They just are not clear to me. God tidied up?? Howso? How did that impact the order of fossils?

First of all, I interpret the Flood as global. And when the question of where the water went, of course the Scriptures are silent on the matter - (as far as I know, anyway).

Therefore, assuming that nature couldn't have removed all that water in such a short period of time, and the angels didn't have the power to do it, I conclude that God, and God alone, tidied up the mess after the Flood.

The fossil record, which I've never really studied, and don't know what they "say," could have been "created" by God simply putting them where they are currently found.

It's like this White Cliffs of Dover thing everyone's crying about.

God could have simply piled all the micro-skeletons (whatever they're called) up in one big place --- and there you have it.

I really don't know --- or care.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
First of all, I interpret the Flood as global. And when the question of where the water went, of course the Scriptures are silent on the matter - (as far as I know, anyway).

Therefore, assuming that nature couldn't have removed all that water in such a short period of time, and the angels didn't have the power to do it, I conclude that God, and God alone, tidied up the mess after the Flood.
Me too. I suppose the details are secondary.
The fossil record, which I've never really studied, and don't know what they "say," could have been "created" by God simply putting them where they are currently found.
That is a strange concept to me. Do you think He actually went around arranging fossils deep under the earth? Why?
It's like this White Cliffs of Dover thing everyone's crying about.

God could have simply piled all the micro-skeletons (whatever they're called) up in one big place --- and there you have it.

I really don't know --- or care.
God would pile up skeletons? Literally?
 
Upvote 0

kangitanka

Regular Member
Jul 2, 2006
281
16
✟23,009.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Married
I really don't know --- or care.
(all emphasis mine)
Creationist quote of the month

But, to his credit, AV is at least WILLING to admit his ignorance and his lack of caring about actual facts and evidence....

...unlike the vast majority of Creationists.

After all, science and reality can both (according to AV1611VET) take a hike. There is a level of honesty there that many (most?) Creationists are not willing to sack up and admit to.
 
Upvote 0

MrGoodBytes

Seeker for life, probably
Mar 4, 2006
5,868
286
✟30,272.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
No problem, bro --- lay it on me if you think I'm wrong. :D



First of all, I interpret the Flood as global. And when the question of where the water went, of course the Scriptures are silent on the matter - (as far as I know, anyway).

Therefore, assuming that nature couldn't have removed all that water in such a short period of time, and the angels didn't have the power to do it, I conclude that God, and God alone, tidied up the mess after the Flood.

The fossil record, which I've never really studied, and don't know what they "say," could have been "created" by God simply putting them where they are currently found.

It's like this White Cliffs of Dover thing everyone's crying about.

God could have simply piled all the micro-skeletons (whatever they're called) up in one big place --- and there you have it.

I really don't know --- or care.
And what would have been the reason for "tidying up", again?
 
Upvote 0

MrGoodBytes

Seeker for life, probably
Mar 4, 2006
5,868
286
✟30,272.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
What kind of question is that?

Safety and sanitation come to mind.
I'm not quite sure in what way safety and sanitation depends on the presence or lack of geological features and fossils that would have been both underground and, most importantly, spread over the entire landmass of this planet when you consider that only a dozen people were alive back then. Perhaps you could elaborate.
 
Upvote 0

Paulos23

Never tell me the odds!
Mar 23, 2005
8,420
4,771
Washington State
✟365,876.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What kind of question is that?

Safety and sanitation come to mind.

Then someone should talk to management, God is behind in his janitorial duties for the planet.
 
Upvote 0

Split Rock

Conflation of Blathers
Nov 3, 2003
17,607
730
North Dakota
✟22,466.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
And what would have been the reason for "tidying up", again?

What kind of question is that?

Safety and sanitation come to mind.

Because we all know how important it is to clean up after a botched attempt at genocide, right?

Excuse me, Mr. Atheist Scientick. HE had HIS reasons for cleaning up HIS mess. HE has revealed these reasons to HIS prophet on Earth, AV1611VET, through the Holy Spirit. You can either accept these reasons, or reject GOD and live in ignorance of HIS INFALLIBLE WORD as revealed by HIS prophet! :amen:
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,634
52,516
Guam
✟5,128,741.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I still don't get how the safety of a dozen people stranded on Mt. Ararat depends on whether the flood leaves traces in, say, northern Canada.
Did it ever occur to you that He may have wanted that water [back] for something else?
 
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
Did it ever occur to you that He may have wanted that water [back] for something else?


Have you ever had it occur to you that people in countries like China find your kind of primitive religiosity a source of amusement and wonder? (and contempt)

Have you ever wondered how you would fare among sophisticated and educated people?

(hint) something like a grass skirt savage in the kings court.
 
Upvote 0