The decline ....

[ebia]

We know whats going on, there continues to be a creeping watering down and attempted diffusion and confusion of the issue with the intention, conciously or subconsciously of getting it accepted eventually when the 'storm' has passed.

In other words you don't actually want to discuss anything because you are afraid that doing so might change some of your assumptions.

 

[sbvd]

In other words you don't actually want to discuss anything because you are afraid that doing so might change some of your assumptions.

Many words has been typed by both "sides", but I have not seen any attempt to discuss anything by neither side. To be honest, at times I was expecting somebody to quote something from the RCC Catechism and I would have had the whole OBOB experience (minus the "you aren't welcomed" here remark )

 

[ebia]

At least the RCC attempts to have coherent theology of the body and sex (whether it succeeds is a different matter).

 

[sbvd]

I believe it would be better if you both attempted to discuss some points and support it, rather than "hey Liberal you are so liberal", "but you are so conservative, Conservative"

 

[ebia]

I believe it would be better if you both attempted to discuss some points and support it, rather than "hey Liberal you are so liberal", "but you are so conservative, Conservative"

I'm trying to get a conversation going, rather than formulate a proof of a particular position.

 

[sbvd]

I'm trying to get a conversation going, rather than formulate a proof of a particular position.

My blessings

 

[brightmorningstar]

In other words you don't actually want to discuss anything because you are afraid that doing so might change some of your assumptions.

There are no assumptions on my part. You can read my post #134, the scriptures describe Christ's NT teaching to disciples to baptise, and that sexual immorality is a barrier to the Kingdom.

What assumptions?