Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I truly do not knowYou seem to be arrogant enough to dismiss the age determined by professional geologists. You've been given sources with data, etc. What value do you think is appropriate for the age of the Earth? (I don't care if you want to say more than x, less than y, between a and b, what ever format fits your analysis or opinion.)
You are calling me a fundamentalist again. Do you want to talk about your father?i,said nothing about the state.
STATS show the fundamentalist beliefs draw their
numbers from the low rungs of the ladder.
Frankly I'm not interested in how old the earth is.I truly do not know
And professional geologists don't say absolutely unquestionably without a doubt that they know exactly how old the earth is.
You assume I'm a fundamentalist because I believe Adam was a real person. Everyone doesn't fit into a neat little stereotype. What is the topic of this forum?
I truly do not know
And professional geologists don't say absolutely unquestionably without a doubt that they know exactly how old the earth is
No scientist would say that about anythingI truly do not know
And professional geologists don't say absolutely unquestionably without a doubt that they know exactly how old the earth is
I don't think she knows what a true fundamentalist is.He called me a fundamentalist again just because I believe Adam was a real person.
Until about two hundred years ago they believed the earth was about 6000 years old and that the flood caused the fossil record. Then they believed in universalism and that it millions of years for the layers to form. Then radiometric dating dated meteorites 4.5 billion years old. Next something else will come along and the theory will change again .I have no problem with you believing the earth is 4.5 billion years old but for some reason it's dangerous if I don'tThe sources listed in this thread give error bars. Expressing the known uncertainty in a measurement is what error bars are for. Do you have any valid reasons to reject their work?
Until about two hundred years ago they believed the earth was about 6000 years old and that the flood caused the fossil record. Then they believed in universalism and that it millions of years for the layers to form. Then radiometric dating dated meteorites 4.5 billion years old. Next something else will come along and the theory will change again .I have no problem with you believing the earth is 4.5 billion years old but for some reason it's dangerous if I don't
Okay you know more about this than I do you sound correct just don't be surprised when the data changes againThis narrative is not correct. "They" (geologists) didn't think the Earth was 6000 years old with a flood. That was a religious claim, not a scientific one. Geology was started to test (or prove) that claim and the first geologists quickly realized that the processes that formed the rocks must have taken millions o years, but they couldn't put precise numbers on things. As you said, then came radiometric dating and the value quickly settled down with some decent levels of precision. The value has become more precise with time, but it hasn't moved.
Yes they do with carbon dating. Science is cool.And professional geologists don't say absolutely unquestionably without a doubt that they know exactly how old the earth is