One case that I like, is how he explains that Physicalists unknowingly follow a belief system that cannot remain true, due to the inconsistencies between General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, and that since our understandings are constantly changing, and our current science will someday be obsolete as time goes on, as understood by
pessemistic induction. He goes on to say that the few Physicalists who understand this, then turn their attention to a future end, that some day, science will eventually come to understand it all.
He concludes that these are both illogical positions to hold -one known to be currently wrong and the other, unknown.
He thinks the exclusivity of Physicalism, has proven itself flawed through the concepts:
- Hempel's dilemma
- Irreducible mentality
- The evolutionary argument against physicalism
- The universal cracking of the casual closure
Hempel's dilemma - Wikipedia
Irreducibility - Wikipedia
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...cQFnoECAQQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2dKTZWUfsEHlbR_EjI0XiS
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://thesideview.co/journal/why-i-am-not-a-physicalist/#:~:text=Universals%20crack%20open%20the%20causal,such%20universals%2C%20such%20objective%20truths.&ved=2ahUKEwimn56BjaT3AhXjIEQIHTBWBlMQFnoECAwQBQ&usg=AOvVaw2tMWQAxyJxN5mUxG7u-le5