That is bizarre to me. I always thought that a campaign contribution was someone giving you money - not you paying someone else.
If you're spending money in service of the campaign, you're contributing to the campaign; you're just bypassing some of the normal channels.
If you're running for office and you want to run a $1000 tv ad, I could donate $1000 to your campaign and you could hire a company to make and run the ad; or I could just take that $1000 and commission the ad myself. What's the difference in terms of benefit to the campaign? Nothing.
So, was the Steele Dossier a contribution to Hilary's campaign?
No, the Steele Dossier was commissioned by the DNC and the Hillary campaign. It was something they paid for. If some third party had commissioned the dossier and gave it to them, then maybe it would've been considered a contribution.
I think it was thrown out because the jury was unable to come to an agreement.
He was acquitted on one charge and the jury couldn't agree on the rest. After the mistrial, the prosecution declined to take another go at it.
Didn't the judge in the Trump case give some instruction claiming that the jury didn't need to come to an agreement in order to convict him?
I remember it being something confusing.
No, that isn't what he said. It also wasn't confusing.
The base-level charges were misdemeanors, but were upgraded to felonies because they were committed in the service of "other crimes". The prosecution specified those three "other crimes" (i.e. federal campaign finance violations, state election manipulation violations, and tax evasion). What the judge told the jury was that they all had to agree that the misdemeanors were done in service of other crimes, but they did not all have to agree on which other crimes they were servicing. IOW, if Juror A thinks Trump fudged the records to skirt campaign finance rules and Juror B thinks he did it to cheat on his taxes, then that's good enough to secure a felony conviction. But if Juror C thinks he did it to hide the affair from Melania, that then would mean they'd get a hung jury, because hiding things from your wife isn't illegal and, therefore, there would be no "other crime" to boost the misdemeanor to a felony.