Zaha Torte
Jesus Christ is the Eternal God
- May 6, 2024
- 1,895
- 827
- 40
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Latter-Day Saint
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What was this other crime?The base crime was a misdemeanor, but it was upgraded to a felony because it was done in pursuit of another crime.
So, anyone at any time could make any claim about any case and this would require all judges to respond in order to be transparent?I understood your claim; I just don't assume that the standard for disclosure is as high as you do. You're assuming that the judge substantiated at least part of the claim (i.e. the part about the poster being a cousin of a juror), whereas I think it's plausible that the judge would be required to inform the parties of the claim as soon as he became aware that the claim was made.
What was this other crime?
I guess we'll find out.So, anyone at any time could make any claim about any case and this would require all judges to respond in order to be transparent?
That sounds very unreasonable to me and would bog down the entire system.
Why not spell it out for me?I answered this in post 142 ...and post 150 ...and 170.
You think that is a reasonable requirement for all judges?I guess we'll find out.
You are wasting your time explaining. The only concern of the left is destroying Trump. Even if they destroy the country in the process. They will gladly embrace mutually assured destruction if it means Trump is destroyed.The trial was about ELECTION fraud. This is what elevated the nda to a felony. Not the EXPIRED misdemeanor.
1. The misdemeanor is mentioned here
A copy and paste from your link
"When a prosecution for an offense is lawfully commenced within the prescribed period of limitation therefor, and when an accusatory instrument upon which such prosecution is based is subsequently dismissed by an authorized court under directions or circumstances"
2. The permitting of another charge ( Election fraud, a federal crime, a felony) For the same issues....
copy and paste continued
" permitting the lodging of another charge for the same offense or an offense based on the same conduct, the period extending from the commencement of the thus defeated prosecution to the dismissal of the accusatory instrument does not constitute a part of the period of limitation" as the first misdemeanor charge"
3. They said since they are finding charge , it would not be part and parcel to the limitations...... of the first charge (misdemeanor)
Either way you slice this
This is about an nda...
The misdemeanor was an FBI investigation.
Trumps lawyers asked several times what the charges were. He never got an answer. We did not find out what they were going for until the last few weeks.
Nonetheless, the People have identified four theories which they intend to present at trial. Specifically, that Defendant intended to violate FFICA, Election Law $ 17-152, Tax Law SS 1801(a)(3), and that Defendant "intended to commit or conceal the falsification of other business records."
Therefor, the people will be limited to only those theories which they have already identified and are hereby precluded from introducing any new or different "other crime" theories at trial.
A person has a right to know exactly what he is being charged. Obviously, you cannot prepare a proper defense without a clear knowledge of what you are defending against.......
I will listen to the legal scholars on this case. And that is also how I will look at these links...and the legalese, which is meant to be confusing. All seeing MANY problems here.
What other crime? In know you don't know because nobody knows. The judge even told the jury to use their imagination. SO WHAT WAS THE FEDERAL CRIME?The base crime was a misdemeanor, but it was upgraded to a felony because it was done in pursuit of another crime.
Why not spell it out for me?
You think that is a reasonable requirement for all judges?
To respond to every social media post that makes claims about a case?
Therefore, the charges were well past the statutes of limitations and should have been dismissed...period.No, the trial was about business records fraud.
That the money for the non disclosure was a campaign contributionWhy not spell it out for me?
Paid stormy Daniels to keep mum, a legal transaction.What exactly did Trump do?
oddYou think that is a reasonable requirement for all judges?
To respond to every social media post that makes claims about a case?
What other crime? In know you don't know because nobody knows. The judge even told the jury to use their imagination. SO WHAT WAS THE FEDERAL CRIME?
You are right. This will all come out when this goes through appeal anyway.You are wasting your time explaining. The only concern of the left is destroying Trump. Even if they destroy the country in the process. They will gladly embrace mutually assured destruction if it means Trump is destroyed.
Apparently, that's all that needs to be alleged. And once that's been done, facts can be ignored over and over again.Politically motivated is all that really needs to be said.
Yes it did unless there was evidence that proved Trump was trying to cover up a federal crime. There are literally only two legal possibilities:No, it hadn't expired.
You did? I saw you make claims and list charges - but I did not see an explanation.Because I've already spelled it out for other people.
What is it with you guys being unable to explain what you supposedly read?What is it with you guys and not wanting to do any reading for yourselves?
Why is that? You seem pretty opinionated to me.I don't have much of an opinion on what is "reasonable" in this case.
How so?That the money for the non disclosure was a campaign contribution
Is this the crime?Paid stormy Daniels to keep mum, a legal transaction.
I would think so.
No. What was the federal crime that Trump was covering up! There was none. Which is why the judge told the jury to literally make it up! If they BELIEVED Trump was concealing a federal offense, regardless of any evidence, by golly, that is good enough for him.This is a Poe, right?
Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to it.Is this the crime?
Is it a crime?Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?