Interesting claim... but not supported by the many ways in which consciousness is demonstrably linked to chemical and physical action on the brain.
So called out of body evidences have never been objectively supported.
.
Wrong thread. I can only note that many doctors and neurologists are now supporting the mind as a separate from the brain, not just over NDE and similar , but such as neuroplasticity, or the lack of storage for some memories held. The mind can alter the structure of the brain. How so if it is a product of it?
But on NDE you are simply wrong.
There are complete books of so called veridical experiences, that is where the patient describes events, people , places and conversations , they cannot possibly have experienced, prior to cardiac restart, where the details of the experience can be corroborated.
So they were not conscious in a medical sense, indeed were clinically dead in the meaning used by some ED. Yet had consciousness. In many cases the details are validated by the medics.
There are also longtitudinal studies that discount the experience being caused by drugs, anoxia, etc etc and they are un correlated to age, religious affiliation or anything else. One exception, apparently young children are more likely to have them.
The mind uses the brain, it is not a process of it.
If you want to start a thread on such I’ll contribute, but I will bow out here - it derails the thread.
