Unbelievers cannot understand Scripture because they cannot understand what God the Holy Spirit wrote,
1Co 2:14 unless He's inside them and unless they live in the last days of this Earth. Daniel 12:4 A good example is the Scriptural Fact that God made one Heaven on the
2nd Day Genesis 1:8 and Lord God/Jesus made other Heavens/Universes on the
3rd Day Genesis 2:4. See?
Yes, I see what you do here. You make up your own stories and try to defuse any potential criticism with "you don't understand because you don't use my holy decoder ring".
It's very convenient for you.
Say, what do you do when you are faced with
believers, who tell you that there is no way that humans landed on Earth 11,000 years ago, because the world is only 6000 years old, and that Noah's flood happened only 4000 years ago? They obviously don't have your exclusive version of the Holy Spirit, right?
Current Science claims that Humans diverged from Chimps 6 million years ago, but that is impossible since Humans (descendants of Adam) arrived on planet Earth only 11k years ago. History records the FIRST HUMAN farming, city building, and every other trait of modern Humans originated in the Cradle of Civilization, Mesopotamia. That's the land between the mouth of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, in the valleys just SW of Lake Van, Turkey in the mountains of Ararat, where Noah's Ark arrived.
So what you write is "in agreement with science"... except when it isn't, and then science is wrong.
But you cannot even keep up this already incoherent standard.
There are a few problems with your statement... several problems in a single statement. Quite a feat.
So, "HISTORY" does not RECORD the first human farming, city building and every other trait of modern humans. What we do have are the as yet earliest remains of what these humans farmed, build and otherwise did. For some of these things, these datings are quite precise. For others, as DogmaHunter has shown in his link, these dates have already been corrected backwards by a few thousand years.
Next, history does not record the deeds of "FIRST HUMANS"... just the oldest remains we have of certain human activities. There are records of the first powered flight made by humans... but that doesn't mean that these were the First Humans. There is no reason to assume that extraterrestial humans landed on earth in 1903 and build a plywood and canvas plane. There are a lot of reasons to assume that these folks were humans, just as their parents and grandparents and ancestors before them... who didn't have any idea of how to fly.
And it is the same with farming, city building and every other trait of modern humans. Some human did that first, but their parents, grandparents and ancestors were just as human who just had not idea of how to do these things. (That is not a precise description how human inventiveness and developement works, but just a parallel to the previous paragraph.)
Next, history does not record that the first human farming, city building AND EVERY OTHER TRAIT OF MODERN HUMANS orginated at that time in that area.
The example I already mentioned: tools. Metal tools - use and control of metals being an important trait of modern humans - came millennia later. General use of tools - created objects instead of naturally occuring ones - came millennia earlier.
So, nothing in science or history can lead us to the conclusion that 11,000 years ago a new sort of humans suddenly arrived on Earth. Instead, science and history tells us that, around 11,000 years ago (more or less), humans who had been around for ages developed techniques that changed their society massively.
And, to build on that last part: they developed techniques that
your version of "humans" would already have had, but conveniently "didn't bring with them"... and weren't able to redevelope for millennia.
Just as you conveniently forgot / ignored the question I asked you about this "superior intelligence". Your version of humans would be capable of judging whether an angel who told them about metal smithing was "good" or "bad"... but they would be too stupid to judge if the angel was
right.
You have nothing. Not history, not science, not scripture. Just bluster.