• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Texas Champions the Rights of the Unborn…Until It Doesn’t

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,099
13,627
Earth
✟234,082.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat

Hank77

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2015
26,638
15,691
✟1,194,033.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
According to the great state of Texas-
In a court response, Issa’s lawyer shot back that the state’s arguments were “nothing more than an attempt to say—without explicitly saying—that an unborn child at seven months gestation is not a person.”

 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,099
13,627
Earth
✟234,082.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
According to the great state of Texas-
In a court response, Issa’s lawyer shot back that the state’s arguments were “nothing more than an attempt to say—without explicitly saying—that an unborn child at seven months gestation is not a person.”

They could be saying that only for the purposes of this one case, a 7 month fetus is not a person, without jeopardizing their stance on abortion. But I’d have to see the arguments which I ain’t gonna find @ Texas tribune.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,228
20,592
Orlando, Florida
✟1,487,707.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
The Republican elites, think tanks, and strategists only care about a notion of fetal rights inasmuch as they can use it to manipulate people into voting for their otherwise losing social policies
 
Upvote 0

RestoreTheJoy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 13, 2018
5,468
1,809
Passing Through
✟548,466.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
A prison guard says she was forced to stay at her post during labor pains. Texas is fighting compensation for her stillbirth.

This case is pre-Dobbs, wherein Texas fights against a fetus’ status as a pre-born human being.
None of that is relevant here. The relevant question is posed in her lawsuit:

"In the months after losing her child, Issa first filed an internal discrimination complaint with TDCJ, according to the lawsuit. But after months without any response from the agency, she and her husband filed a complaint in federal court in October.

Aside from violating the unborn child’s right to life and bodily integrity, the challenge claims TDCJ and the supervisors violated Issa’s basic rights and discriminated against her based on her sex and pregnancy. The lawsuit also argues TDCJ officials violated the provision of the federal Family and Medical Leave Act that entitles employees to take emergency leave to care for their children."

She was not permitted to leave for 2 1/2 hours after she said she was in labor because no one was there to replace her, we are told. Whether this is the proximate cause of her stillborn child's death is a matter of fact for a jury.
 
Upvote 0