• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Tertullian on the Soul

sandman

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2003
2,465
1,657
MI
✟136,537.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
Politics
US-Constitution
It’s interesting that you interpret the Gospel of John by quoting Ecclesiastes. The Book of John gives us the famous quote on God’s promise of eternal life in John 3:16. In contrast, Ecclesiastes seems to take no account of an afterlife. Some modern Christians are aware of the lack of a concept of the afterlife in most of the Old Testament, others are not. I first became aware of it at a talk by a Methodist theologian.

It would be better to look at the Old Testament through the lens of what we have learned from the New Testament.



Like the fool, the wise man too must die!
--From Ecclesiastes 2:16 NIV

I know that there is nothing better for men than to be happy and do good while they live.
--Ecclesiastes 3:12

Notice that hope of an afterlife is not mentioned.
The following two verses make the same point.


Whatever your hand finds to do, do it with all your might, for
in the grave, where you are going, there is
neither working nor planning nor knowledge nor wisdom.
--Ecclesiastes 9:10

However many years a man may live, let him enjoy them all. But let him remember the days of darkness, for they will be many. Everything to come is meaningless.
--Ecclesiastes 11:8

The “days of darkness” here are the time spent in the grave, after death.

This is the evil in everything that happens under the sun: The same destiny overtakes all.
--From Ecclesiastes 9:3

With all who live, there is hope: even a live dog is better off than a dead lion!
--From Ecclesiastes 9:4

For the living know that they will die, but the dead know nothing; they have no further reward, and even the memory of them is forgotten.
--Ecclesiastes 9:5


The mention of “spirit” in Ecclesiastes 12:7 means only that life returns to God, who gave it. It does not imply either hope of resurrection or survival of the personality in any other form.

It is better to read the Old Testament in the light of what we know from the New Testament.

I didn’t use it to interpret, I used it as a reference… because it is the one verse in the Word of God which clearly states what happens to the spirit at death (spirit, not soul). Spirit is from God and returns to God… whether it was conditional as in the OT (based upon their walks) or unconditional based on the new covenant brought about by what Jesus Christ accomplished which is confirmed in Act 7:59 with Stephen.

However …when we are raised that is a different story and I didn’t think this was a discussion about afterlife, that is somewhat of a side shift from the two words (soul and spirit) we are discussing.

As for looking at the OT through the lens of the NT …I think I understand what he was saying…. but I actually perceive the OT as the foundation for the New….and when I speak of New.. I am starting from the day of Pentecost.

As I stated before The Old Testament is the fountain-head of the Hebrew language. It has no literature behind it. But the case is entirely different with the Greek language which…in many cases laden with centuries of development with whereas the Hebrew is divine in its origin and usage….

Paul (through revelation from Jesus Christ) references or quotes the OT 184 times in the epistles…. Christ Himself quotes or references the OT 180 times.

So, although we are living in the administration of grace, we still must give the OT its due diligence.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,397
11,931
Georgia
✟1,099,336.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
our Lord was challenging the Pharisaical tradition; indeed, He could not have been challenging Church tradition

Church tradition in fact - nation-church tradition for the nation-church started by God at Sinai with the method for successors of the High Priest divinely appointed by God.

Mark 7:
7 ‘But in vain do they worship Me,
Teaching as doctrines the precepts of men.’
8 Neglecting the commandment of God, you hold to the tradition of men.”
9 He was also saying to them, “You are experts at setting aside the commandment of God in order to keep your tradition. 10 For Moses said, ‘Honor your father and your mother’; and, ‘He who speaks evil of father or mother, is to be put to death’; 11 but you say, ‘If a man says to his father or his mother, whatever I have that would help you is Corban (that is to say, given to God),’ 12 you no longer permit him to do anything for his father or his mother; 13 thus invalidating the word of God by your tradition which you have handed down; and you do many things such as that.”​

There was no "ignore the teachings of Christ - they don't apply to us" message given by any of the Gospel writers. As we probably both know.

So then the Catholics that created the Protestant reformation applied that principle - they followed Christ's example.
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,509
1,338
72
Sebring, FL
✟843,595.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I didn’t use it to interpret, I used it as a reference… because it is the one verse in the Word of God which clearly states what happens to the spirit at death (spirit, not soul). Spirit is from God and returns to God… whether it was conditional as in the OT (based upon their walks) or unconditional based on the new covenant brought about by what Jesus Christ accomplished which is confirmed in Act 7:59 with Stephen.

However …when we are raised that is a different story and I didn’t think this was a discussion about afterlife, that is somewhat of a side shift from the two words (soul and spirit) we are discussing.

As for looking at the OT through the lens of the NT …I think I understand what he was saying…. but I actually perceive the OT as the foundation for the New….and when I speak of New.. I am starting from the day of Pentecost.

As I stated before The Old Testament is the fountain-head of the Hebrew language. It has no literature behind it. But the case is entirely different with the Greek language which…in many cases laden with centuries of development with whereas the Hebrew is divine in its origin and usage….

Paul (through revelation from Jesus Christ) references or quotes the OT 184 times in the epistles…. Christ Himself quotes or references the OT 180 times.

So, although we are living in the administration of grace, we still must give the OT its due diligence.


I don't understand the distinction between "spirit" and "soul" that you make. Both are nonphysical, so aren't they the same thing?
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,509
1,338
72
Sebring, FL
✟843,595.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I didn’t use it to interpret, I used it as a reference… because it is the one verse in the Word of God which clearly states what happens to the spirit at death (spirit, not soul). Spirit is from God and returns to God… whether it was conditional as in the OT (based upon their walks) or unconditional based on the new covenant brought about by what Jesus Christ accomplished which is confirmed in Act 7:59 with Stephen.

However …when we are raised that is a different story and I didn’t think this was a discussion about afterlife, that is somewhat of a side shift from the two words (soul and spirit) we are discussing.

As for looking at the OT through the lens of the NT …I think I understand what he was saying…. but I actually perceive the OT as the foundation for the New….and when I speak of New.. I am starting from the day of Pentecost.

As I stated before The Old Testament is the fountain-head of the Hebrew language. It has no literature behind it. But the case is entirely different with the Greek language which…in many cases laden with centuries of development with whereas the Hebrew is divine in its origin and usage….

Paul (through revelation from Jesus Christ) references or quotes the OT 184 times in the epistles…. Christ Himself quotes or references the OT 180 times.

So, although we are living in the administration of grace, we still must give the OT its due diligence.


Sandman: << As I stated before The Old Testament is the fountain-head of the Hebrew language. It has no literature behind it. But the case is entirely different with the Greek language which…in many cases laden with centuries of development with whereas the Hebrew is divine in its origin and usage…. >>


The Hebrew language has no special status. No verse in the Bible says any such thing. You say that Hebrew has “no literature.” I’m not sure what that would mean but it seems that you are simply unaware of that literature.


“Literature in Hebrew has been produced uninterruptedly from the early 12th century bc, and certain excavated tablets may indicate a literature of even greater antiquity. From 1200 bc to c. ad 200, Hebrew was a spoken language in Palestine, first as biblical Hebrew, then as Mishnaic Hebrew, a later dialect that does not derive directly from the biblical dialect and one that gained literary status as the Pharisees began to employ it in their teaching in the 2nd century bc”


Link
Hebrew literature
 
Upvote 0

sandman

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2003
2,465
1,657
MI
✟136,537.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
Politics
US-Constitution
I don't understand the distinction between "spirit" and "soul" that you make. Both are nonphysical, so aren't they the same thing?

I think this post give a better explanation of the difference #32
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,509
1,338
72
Sebring, FL
✟843,595.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I think this post give a better explanation of the difference #32


I didn’t find your post #32 to be helpful. You say that you are going to explain the difference between soul and spirit, then make a lengthy explanation on the meaning of soul in the OT. The word “spirit” never once appears in your explanation of the difference between “soul” and “spirit.” I still don’t know what a spirit is in your scheme of things.

In your discussion of Hebrew words, you are overlooking a crucial point. Language does not control reality. The ancient Hebrew language embodies the ancient Hebrew conception of things, but it is a human language. There is a limit to what the meaning of a word can tell us.
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,509
1,338
72
Sebring, FL
✟843,595.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Sorry for the negative perception …that is not my intention. I very much appreciate soul …I wouldn’t be here without one… although that would probably make some people happy.


My argument is not with soul, it’s with the misrepresentation of soul …Which has been taken from philosophers, and adopted into religion …. thus, consecrating the soul as immortal….and biblically, that is inaccurate.

As I stated in my earlier post, the Word of God is my only source of Truth. It is what I measure all other against. It is the final authority when it comes to …. theory, philosophy, religion, church writing and anything else. If any of those match up with what the Word states…were cool….if not, it’s dust in the wind.

(I am just dropping a portion of a previous post I did but it should be sufficient to define soul.)

The subject of soul has a couple tentacles that are very interesting, but I will refrain from going there and stick to the subject.

While soul is occasionally reference as the spirit of man in the Bible, (context determined) there is no immortality or transmigration of the soul…………………soul and spirit (biblically) are two very different things. How people use them in secular and religious dialogue may or may not reflect Gods intent.

The Hebrew word for soul is the word nephesh.

It is used 738x in the OT (Old Testament) and has been translated soul 475x, and various other words 263x, including: life, person, mind, heart, creature, body, himself, ..etc.

The Hebrew word chay, which means “alive, living soul, or moving life”…. will always be employed in the Word of God with nephesh → as living life, in contrast to a dead or perished soul….(nephesh is the Hebrew word for soul)


Gen 1:21

1:21 And God created great whales, and every living = chay creature = nephesh that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

The first thing to note is that when God created soul life, He created it in great whales and every living creature that moveth. That tells us that soul life is not only in animals, but that it was created in animals first.

The word create is first used in Gen 1:1 when God, in the beginning, created the heavens and the earth.


Create = bara in Hebrew - The word create is to bring something into existence that did not exist before, or to make something out of nothing. From Gen 1:1 to Gen 1:21, God did not create anything again until the 5th day when He created soul life in “great whales and every living creature.


((WHERE is the soul?))

The soul is our breath life, It’s what gives life to a persons body, it’s vitality. …. But the question becomes ….Where is the soul?

In Leviticus God tells us…..

Lev 17:11

For the life [nephesh] of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls [nephesh]: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul [nephesh]

The word life in this verse is the same word for soul (nephesh) Soul life is in the blood.

Going back to basic Biology: Oxygen is delivered throughout the body by means of the red blood cells ….actually it is the hemoglobin molecules from the red cells that deliver the oxygen to the individual cells in the body tissue. The bloodstream also picks up CO2 from the body and returns it to the lunges to be exhaled…

What happens when we die?

The heart, which pumps the blood, which delivers the oxygen to the brain …… stops….. soul life ceases in that particular person…. but is carried on through prodigy. But if there is no offspring, the soul is gone when that person dies; there is nothing immortal about the soul.

In Gen 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. (chay nephesh)


The words “breathed into his nostrils is the figure of speech anthropopatheia or condescension. This figure is used of the ascription of human passions, actions, or attributes, to God.
(Of the 219 known figures of speech, God uses more than 214 in the Bible.)


The same soul life that God created in Gen 1:21 is the same soul life that God breathed into Adam, which made Adam a living soul….It is also the same soul life that continues in mankind today.

1Co 15:36-50 goes through the natural and spiritual body…and concludes in 1Co 15:50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.


Sandman: “My argument is not with soul, it’s with the misrepresentation of soul …Which has been taken from philosophers, and adopted into religion …. thus, consecrating the soul as immortal….and biblically, that is inaccurate.”

Sandman: “While soul is occasionally reference as the spirit of man in the Bible, (context determined) there is no immortality or transmigration of the soul … ”



I have a question. If there is no such thing as an immortal soul, do angels have physical bodies? For that matter, do demons have physical bodies? I don’t know any reason to believe this is the case, but if there is no such thing as an immortal soul, it looks like both angels and demons must have physical bodies. ( … and nothing else.)
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,509
1,338
72
Sebring, FL
✟843,595.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Luk 23:46 And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit: and having said thus, he gave up the ghost.

Spirit, according to Ecc 12:7 returns to God. Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.
Taking his last breath is soul life …which ceased.



I am not the one who determines figure of speech…God does. There are many different types of figure of speech….. Some, like attributing human characteristics to God are easily recognizable with others I utilize Bullinger’s book “Figures Of Speech Used In The Bible” which is one of the most complete writings on figures……Figures, like idioms, are used to draw our attention and/or illuminate to what is being spoken. It's a figure of speech because God a spirit (Jhn 4:24) and a spirit has no form.
We do the same thing with figures and analogies when writing in English.

I use the OT for description or explanation of words when applicable because it is the fountainhead of the Hebrew language. …it has no literature behind it….Unlike the Greek…. Allowing Gods Word to interpret itself is how I roll.



For clarification …it was me who used the word heart in my description with blood. And I am sure you are right about what the ancient Hebrews knew …But that doesn’t dismiss the truth of the function of the heart in conjunction with blood. They may not have known… but God knew….and he is the Author.



Sandman: “Allowing Gods Word to interpret itself is how I roll.”

I’ve heard the claim that we should let the Bible interpret the Bible a number of times. I’ve always found that this means that the interpretation to come is arbitrary. I’ve never known it to lead to a solid result. It is a slogan that sounds good but has no precise meaning.
 
Upvote 0

sandman

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2003
2,465
1,657
MI
✟136,537.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
Politics
US-Constitution
I didn’t find your post #32 to be helpful. You say that you are going to explain the difference between soul and spirit, then make a lengthy explanation on the meaning of soul in the OT. The word “spirit” never once appears in your explanation of the difference between “soul” and “spirit.” I still don’t know what a spirit is in your scheme of things.

In your discussion of Hebrew words, you are overlooking a crucial point. Language does not control reality. The ancient Hebrew language embodies the ancient Hebrew conception of things, but it is a human language. There is a limit to what the meaning of a word can tell us.

I partially agree….. The meaning of the words should be interpreted according to the time of usage. The word hell is a good example…I shouldn’t even open this can of worms as it misdirects this thread…..but briefly → The word hell is a Greek word that comes laden with all sorts of mystical trash that the Greeks have put upon this word, and has been made synonymous in definition with sheol, hades, gehenna, katakaio, and tartaros.

The word sheol has been translated hell half the time (31) in the OT and pit 3x


The best comparison I can give between the words of sheol and hades would be that of our current word “woke”. Now KJV used the word “awoke” but NIV uses the English word “woke22x and ESV 11x.

The biblical meaning for awoke or “woke” is to arise… generally from sleep. But let’s just imagine that we use the current meaning of woke (which comes in with all sorts of absurd meaning) when defining the biblical term… Kind of a ridiculous thought but…this is a illustration. …..That is exactly what has happened to the word sheol to a certain degree. The Greek word hades was used as a counterpart for the Hebrew word sheol .. which is divine in its origin and usage. The Greek Hades is human in its nature and come down laden with centuries of development, in which it has acquired new senses, meaning and usages. And the meaning for sheol in the OT is completely different than the Greek hades …therein lies the corruption…And that is as far as I go with this…. as it is a whole different study….but hopefully you catch the drift of my comparison.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Body and Soul

As I stated from Lev 17:11 the life (nephesh) of the flesh is in the blood
That is Soul life

Oxygen is delivered throughout the body by means of the red blood cells ….actually it is the hemoglobin molecules from the red cells that deliver the oxygen to the individual cells in the body tissue. The bloodstream also picks up CO2 from the body and returns it to the lunges to be exhaled…
What happens when we die? The heart, which pumps the blood, which delivers the oxygen to the brain …… stops….. soul life ceases in that particular person but is carried on through prodigy. But if there is no offspring, the soul is gone when that person dies; there is nothing immortal about the soul.

I think I Corinthians 15 makes the best distinction between soul and spirit.


1Co 15:42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption:

1Co 15:43 It is sown in dishonor; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power:

1Co 15:44 It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.

1Co 15:45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.

1Co 15:46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.

1Co 15:47 The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.

1Co 15:48 As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly.

1Co 15:49 And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.

1Co 15:50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood (body and soul) CANNOT inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.
 
Upvote 0

sandman

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2003
2,465
1,657
MI
✟136,537.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
Politics
US-Constitution
Sandman: “My argument is not with soul, it’s with the misrepresentation of soul …Which has been taken from philosophers, and adopted into religion …. thus, consecrating the soul as immortal….and biblically, that is inaccurate.”

Sandman: “While soul is occasionally reference as the spirit of man in the Bible, (context determined) there is no immortality or transmigration of the soul … ”



I have a question. If there is no such thing as an immortal soul, do angels have physical bodies? For that matter, do demons have physical bodies? I don’t know any reason to believe this is the case, but if there is no such thing as an immortal soul, it looks like both angels and demons must have physical bodies. ( … and nothing else.)

Certain things I cannot explain, but I know this to be true. Angels can appear in what we see as a human form but they are spirit beings….. Demons (devils spirits) cannot. They can take on some various forms but not that of a human, they need a person to possess …. I only know this of a certainty because of what I used to be into before the Word.
 
Upvote 0

sandman

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2003
2,465
1,657
MI
✟136,537.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
Politics
US-Constitution
Sandman: “Allowing Gods Word to interpret itself is how I roll.”

I’ve heard the claim that we should let the Bible interpret the Bible a number of times. I’ve always found that this means that the interpretation to come is arbitrary. I’ve never known it to lead to a solid result. It is a slogan that sounds good but has no precise meaning.

This is what I developed many years ago in and it is what I hand out to new believers. It’s not a complete format, but in its raw form it’s what I utilize in my study. Agree or disagree... it works for me.

RESEARCH KEYS:


The first key is laid out in John16:13a Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, it will guide you into all truth (or one truth)…..guiding doesn’t happen without you moving….you need to study.

The second underline key to research is to ALWAYS “read what is written” . Not what you think is written, and not what you already believe is written…….. but what is written.
When the Bible states “about 120” (Act 1:15) it is not 120 …it may be 119 …it may be 121 but it is not 120.

The Bible interprets itself and fits together like an intricate jigsaw puzzle. It is up to us to see how it fits by rightly dividing the Word of truth. We do NOT interpret the Bible; we see how the Bible interprets itself with the various keys and principle of biblical research.

2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

Rightly divide is not synonymous with interpret…God has magnified His Word above all His name (Psa 138:2) Drawing conclusion(s) based on your assumption or desire to prove your theory is elevating yourself above God. If it’s not supported by rightly dividing the Word it is human speculation…..

KISS Keep it simple saints. You don’t need to look for hidden messages within the scripture. If you are a mathematical genius or an astronomical geek you can certainly have a field day with numerical and planetary truths that God has encrypted within scripture…But if you can absorb the greatness of what Christ accomplished and what God made unto us through His sacrifice ….. your walk in resurrection perfection will be on the level of the apostle Paul.


1.) IN THE VERSE

a.) 80% of the bible interprets itself in the verse where it is written.
b.) Words in the verse must be understood according to the meaning of the words at the time of usage.
c.) Difficult verses must be understood in light of clear verses ….relating to the same subject
d.) Any one verse must always be in harmony with scripture relating to the identical subject
e.) One scripture may not tell all the details; other scripture may add to it without contradicting each other. Scripture build-up {especially in the Gospels} helps to illuminate the complete message. One gospel may give an event from a certain perspective where another will fill in certain detail.




2.) IN THE CONTEXT

a.) If the Word does not interpret itself the verse…. context will determine the meaning of the verse or verses in question.
b.) Context as related to whom it is written or the specific subject can be determined by either the immediate context, or remoter context.
c.) The context relating to the same or similar: subject must be kept within the administrative boundaries. You cannot correlate in part or in whole the same subject from two separate dispensations (administrations) unless they relate directly and are identical. This is primary applicable when trying to mix or correlate the gospels with the Grace administration.

D.) Pronouns are crucial when reading the context of scripture. Watch for pronouns which are used to differentiate between groups or individuals of events or situations.




3.) PREVIOUS USAGE

When you have a word that neither the verse nor the context determines its interpretation, going back to the first usage of that word will generally illuminate its meaning. Checking the first use of that word in the verse should determine its meaning; the meaning will remain the same throughout, UNLESS it is given a new definition in which case that will carry the consideration.

(Keep in mind….when searching for the first use of word…. the books of the Bible are not in chronological order)



OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

LITTLE WORDS WITH BIG MEANINGS:

Prepositions and conjunctions are especially important when directing the flow of thought in context.
a.) The use of the article “THE” must be carefully noted especially when dealing with the subject of holy spirit. (more on the article at the bottom)
b.) The word “ALL” is used just as it is used today, context will determine its meaning, whether it is “ALL” without exception, or “ALL” with distinction.
c.) The use of “but” and “not” must be recognized for the degree of contrast or negation they signify in a passage.



TIME WORDS must be carefully noted in regard to whether an event occurs in the past, present, or future. Some words like Then are subtle but indicate a period of time

IN THE BEGINNING
The word beginning or in the beginning must be carefully examined to determine which beginning. At times this refers to Genesis, other times it refers to the beginning of an event in an administration; context will determine the value of the word. For example: The first 3 chapters of 1 John “in the beginning” is used 9 or 10 times and references Pentecost.


TO WHOM IS IT WRITTEN

There are only three groups of people that God addresses in the Bible
Jews, Gentiles, or Church of God …….





ALL THOSE LITTLE THINGS
Punctuation, capitalization, chapter headings, chapter divisions, and verse divisions were all added by translators. They are extremely helpful, but they are not “given by inspiration of God” The majority of these thing have been well supplied, but there are a good number of areas where they are inaccurate. Always rely on the context to determine the truth

CUSTOMS AND CULTURES

The Bible is riddled with references to the everyday customs of the time in which it was written. We should become familiar with the manner of life, idioms, orientalism’s, customs, and culture to properly understand scripture.

FIGURES OF SPEACH
There are 219 figures of speech known in the world…. at least 214 of them are used in the Bible. It is not imperative to know these, but helpful in research and study. E. W. Bullinger has documented most all these figures of speech with scriptural reference, which makes it easy to look up. Figures of speech are used by God to put emphasis on that particular passage or account. (“Figures of Speech Used in the Bible”….Book by E. W. Bullinger)

GREEK & HEBREW

You do not have to know these languages to verify the truths in the Word of God. There is an abundance of resources online (MMS that have been translated) that you can use to verify the translation thereof and most of the resources have included the parsing.

Learning both the Greek and Hebrew grammar would be a great asset to your study and research, as the grammar for each is very different from that of English.

The article in the Greek is a classic example:

The Greeks do not need the article to make the noun definite as used in English. In the Greek a substantive is definite without the article……The article originally came from the demonstrative pronoun such as “this” or “that” ….which calls attention with special emphasis to a designated object. Its function is to point out an object or draw attention to it….. It is used with a word that makes the word stand out distinctly. Whenever the Greeks used the article, it points out individual identity…. and it marks a specific object of thought.

The Greeks used the article with infinitives, adjectives, adverbs, prepositional phrases, and clauses …..or even with whole sentences….. We do not have a corresponding English usage or anything even remotely similar.

When the article appears in Greek ….it always signals some special significance. And we need to look at the matter from the Greek point of view, not the English, if we are to discover the reason that the article is used.
 
Upvote 0