• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Ten comandments; Intersting

How Do you feel about the Ten comandments?

  • Ten Comandments should be allowed on Government property.

  • Should be no where near Government property.

  • Don't care, doesn't hurt or help.

  • Get religion out of all Government affairs. Off the money, no prayers before meetings.


Results are only viewable after voting.

Billnew

Legend
Apr 23, 2004
21,246
1,234
60
Ohio
Visit site
✟50,363.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,149197,00.html

Poll

— 76% of Americans surveyed are ok with displaying Ten Commandments on government ground.

— 23% opposed displaying the commandments on government property.
— That poll was conducted by Ipsos for the AP. It has a margin of error of +/- 3 points.

[/ This is the first Supreme Court hearing about the Ten Commandments in 24 years.

— The last ruling was in 1980, when the Supreme Court struck down a Kentucky law requiring that the Ten Commandments be displayed in public classrooms.

— Since then, lower courts have made about two dozen conflicting rulings on the subject.

— The Bush administration is siding with Kentucky and Texas in support of the displays.QUOTE]

I think it's about time to have the "final"word on this. Doubt it will happen in my lifetime, but isn't that what Supreme Court is suppose to do?

I thought the poll was intersting by Posters here on the forum I thought it would have be closer to 60/40 or 55/45.

How can you ask someone to swear on a bible, to tell the truth, pray for the Supreme Court, and the Congress and Senate, have "IN GOD WE TRUST" on our currency. How can the Ten comandments be unConstitutional?
Without god?
 

Doctrine1st

Official nitwit
Oct 11, 2002
10,009
445
Seattle
Visit site
✟12,523.00
Faith
Politics
US-Others
Don't care, has absolutely no relevance to me. And given their daily activities, certainly to those within the walls of Government with, killing, bearing false witness, coveting, stealing, and adultry, it doesn't have any affect on them either, except when it comes to pandering.

We Americans like our symbols, might as well put a Lettermen's top ten list up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucid42day
Upvote 0

ade32

English American
Jun 23, 2004
1,274
61
53
Columbus, OH
✟1,744.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Don't care either. I can see both sides of the story. Whether or not there is a monument there is irrelevent. At the end of the day, if its there or not, there is still going to be a heaven and an earth and Jesus is Lord whether the state endorses its or not.

What gets me is that conservatives paint this as a reason to promote liberal bashing, trying to take God out of society, making us all atheists, blah de blah. I'd like to say now that most liberals don't really care about this issue and the people who are fighting against the placement of the monument do NOT represent liberals.
 
Upvote 0

ZACTAK

Contributor
Feb 12, 2005
7,554
130
Missouri
✟31,157.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Billnew said:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,149197,00.html

Poll

— 76% of Americans surveyed are ok with displaying Ten Commandments on government ground.

— 23% opposed displaying the commandments on government property.
— That poll was conducted by Ipsos for the AP. It has a margin of error of +/- 3 points.

[/ This is the first Supreme Court hearing about the Ten Commandments in 24 years.

— The last ruling was in 1980, when the Supreme Court struck down a Kentucky law requiring that the Ten Commandments be displayed in public classrooms.

— Since then, lower courts have made about two dozen conflicting rulings on the subject.

— The Bush administration is siding with Kentucky and Texas in support of the displays.QUOTE]

I think it's about time to have the "final"word on this. Doubt it will happen in my lifetime, but isn't that what Supreme Court is suppose to do?

I thought the poll was intersting by Posters here on the forum I thought it would have be closer to 60/40 or 55/45.

How can you ask someone to swear on a bible, to tell the truth, pray for the Supreme Court, and the Congress and Senate, have "IN GOD WE TRUST" on our currency. How can the Ten comandments be unConstitutional?
Without god?

There technically is nothing in the Constitution about a seperation of church and state. What people are referring to is a letter Thomas Jefferson wrote to a church about seperation of church and state. The First Amendment talks about freedom of religion... we have the freedom to choose what religion we want to follow. It doesn't say we have freedom from religion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaryS
Upvote 0

praying

Snazzy Title Goes Here
Site Supporter
Jan 9, 2004
32,648
1,608
69
New Jersey
✟131,040.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Doctrine1st said:
And given their daily activities, certainly to those within the walls of Government with, bearing false witness, coveting, stealing, and adultry, it doesn't have any affect on them either, except when it comes to pandering.


This is such a sad but true statement and they neve meant much to many in government in practice.
 
Upvote 0

k

reset
Aug 29, 2004
18,914
808
116
✟23,943.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
The T.C. should not be allowed on government property because it inherently tells people we are living under a mock hypocritical Christian theocracy. If we are going to allow something from the Bible on government property then we should make room to have something from the Qu'ran, Buddha, Hindu, Taoism, etc.
 
Upvote 0

Vylo

Stick with the King!
Aug 3, 2003
24,768
7,823
44
New Jersey
✟212,969.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Our law is not based on the 10 commandments, and should not be on display there. As for separation, it is part of the constitution. Jefferson wrote it, I think anything he wrote in regards to it makes it pretty explicit what he meant therein.

Separation, however does not mean that one has to shed, or hide their religion. If one is allowed to give a speech while accepting a public office, they should be able to include prayer in it if they so chose.
 
Upvote 0

nadroj1985

A bittersweet truth: sum, ergo cogito
Dec 10, 2003
5,784
292
40
Lexington, KY
✟30,543.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Others
The ten commandments really ought to be kept away from government places, to keep a healthy separation of church and state. One could say that this or that issue is not that important, but it's hard to draw the line that way; the more we allow mixing of church and state, the more likely it is that we will move towards the church corrupting the state and vice versa. I don't want that, and I don't see why anyone else would either.

I have to vote for the last option. It ought to not be on our money, prayers probably should be made personal if they're done in a governmental meeting, and we definitely shouldn't be asked to swear on a Bible. Swearing oaths is unBiblical, anyway. That whole practice is rather silly.
 
Upvote 0

Paleoconservatarian

God's grandson
Jan 4, 2005
2,755
200
✟33,897.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
seebs said:
If church and state are not kept separated, the government will eventually dictate church policy; this is the nature of governments.

They already do, and it has nothing to do with a TC statue. They call it 501(c)(3)
 
Upvote 0

lucid42day

where do I go when the land touches sea
Apr 1, 2004
1,630
97
47
We'll stumble through the APT.
✟24,766.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Others
Neverstop said:
The T.C. should not be allowed on government property because it inherently tells people we are living under a mock hypocritical Christian theocracy. If we are going to allow something from the Bible on government property then we should make room to have something from the Qu'ran, Buddha, Hindu, Taoism, etc.
But I thought that the monument that can be sculpted was not the way...

;)
 
Upvote 0

lucid42day

where do I go when the land touches sea
Apr 1, 2004
1,630
97
47
We'll stumble through the APT.
✟24,766.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Others
This appears to be part of an overall pattern that I see. In order to have your way you have to find an issue with no real consequence and truly seize upon it. It isn't really that the movers or shakers want the Ten Commandments really care where it's displayed or not displayed, but it is so much easier to get someone to do something when you tell them to if they've already done what you wanted before.

I replied to the poll that I didn't really care and truly I don't. I am an agnostic and I thought there were a lot more than ten to begin with. But this is a hunt for foot soldiers in a war that isn't there over a monument that may as well be of a loaf of bread.

I don't get it, but I'm not that interested in power. I would rather do something myself than ask someone else to do it. That's two things I don't think you'll see from the top echelons of this movement.
 
Upvote 0

Doctrine1st

Official nitwit
Oct 11, 2002
10,009
445
Seattle
Visit site
✟12,523.00
Faith
Politics
US-Others
utdbear said:
If this is struck down, what are they going to do with the 40 references to the 10 commandments engraved into the Supreme Court building?
40 references of the 10 commandments as given to Moses on Mt. Sinai from God? They can always turn it into a shrine honoring ancient near east mythology.
 
Upvote 0