• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

temple mount

Status
Not open for further replies.

RKF

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2002
408
0
texas
Visit site
✟934.00
As I type the Arabs/Arafat, is giving the Jews the rights to the Temple Mount, The now have the red heifer, needed to cleanse the priest, all the temple tools.

Time is short people, make sure your right with God!!!!

Jhn 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.
 

NumberOneSon

The poster formerly known as Acts6:5
Mar 24, 2002
4,138
478
51
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟37,370.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
(I posted this on the other thread too.)

The link lead me to the latest United Press article on the site that stated...

"According to Yitzhak Frankenthal, leader of the attending Oz ve-Shalom, an Israeli religious group for peace, Arafat said, "It was not a problem to sign the Clinton framework suggestion, only if we could get sovereignty over the Haram al Sharif -- Temple Mount." Haram al Sharif and Temple Mount are the Israeli and Arab names for the Muslim holy site in Jerusalem, which Jews also revere."

I couldn't find an article that stated Palastinians or Arabs were now giving Jews rights to some of the Temple Mount. I didn't see anything overturning Arafat's desire for sovereignty over Haram al Sharif. The radio broadcast link was also entitled "Arafat: Talks Broke Down Over Temple Mount". I don't see where that has changed.

Could you provide a direct link to the article in question? Thanks.

In Christ,

Acts6:5
 
Upvote 0

NumberOneSon

The poster formerly known as Acts6:5
Mar 24, 2002
4,138
478
51
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟37,370.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Thanks RKF,

The problem is the article you provided is the same one I quoted from. The first paragraph only says that Arafat "MIGHT revisit a peace plan proposed at the Camp David talks U.S. President Bill Clinton arranged two years ago". And in the rest of the article, Arafat made it clear that the only problem he had with the proposal was that he wanted "sovereignty over the Haram al Sharif -- Temple Mount".

I see no place in the article that states that Arafat is now willing to give partial authority of the Temple Mount over to the Israelis. He hasn't done this, nor does it seem he will. The title of the article is misleading, RKF; it says that "Arafat says he accepts Camp David plan", but the actual article says there is one part of the plan he is NOT willing to accept. The Temple Mount deal.

Arafat accepts all of the Camp David plan except the Temple Mount part. And that's the problem.

In Christ,

Acts6:5
 
Upvote 0

NumberOneSon

The poster formerly known as Acts6:5
Mar 24, 2002
4,138
478
51
Pennsylvania
Visit site
✟37,370.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Whoops - you edited while I was posting. I tried to access the radio program, but my work computer wouldn't let me get it. Plus, isn't the latest radio show entitled "Arafat: Talks Broke Down Over Temple Mount"?

In Christ,

Acts6:5
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.