Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Recall your geometry lessons in school: the angle of a straight line is 180 degrees. If the earth is flat, sunrise and sunset should be 180 degrees apart. But sunrise and sunset aren't 180 degrees apart as observed on most places on earth at various times of the years.
At 45 degrees north of the equator, on December 22 the sun rises at 123 degrees (roughly SE) and sets at 237 degrees (roughly southwest.) This is only a 114 degree difference.
On June 20, the numbers are 55 degrees (a change of 68 degrees to the north) and 305 degrees (68 degrees farther north.) This is a difference of 250 degrees.
If the sun is travelling in a straight line across the sky, the only explanation for the differences between the differences of 114 and 205 degrees is that the earth is not flat but a sphere.
Even more revealing is that at the poles, at certain times of the year the sun never goes below the horizon.
If Antarctica were not out of bounds
There are no (reliable) videos of 24 hour sun-light in Antarctica,
Why ban people from Antarctica, if NASA and Co. have nothing to hide?
But it’s doesnt explain the phases of the inner planets like mercury and Venus . Mercury and Venus have phases like the moon . And they have to stay a close distance to the sun Their orbits and what they look like don’t make sense on a geocentric system .
...but time lapse footage from the ground shows the exact opposite where as the sun travels farther away, the areas to the left and right of the sun at the horizon line goes dark first, which wouldn't happen in the current globe model.
{snip YouTube video}
The problem with pictures is there are enough proven fakes out there from NASA to question the authenticity of anything they release.
It does.1. Refraction.
2. Why doesn't the sun get smaller as it get's "further away" as Flerfs claim?
Wait, there are people who believe travel to Antarctica is banned???
I've watched it, that's not what they said at all. They said you must apply for permits, and you must if not taking one of the established cruises that go only to certain places and have already applied for permits.Flerfers believe you can't even get close enough to the "ice wall" to photograph it would NASA chasing you or killing you or whatever, much less travel there.
Yup.I've watched it, that's not what they said at all. They said you must apply for permits, and you must if not taking one of the established cruises that go only to certain places and have already applied for permits.
Mammon rules supreme.Yup.
Then eventually some Big Dilbert company will add waivers to their application, get the application approved, and end up ruining everything.
Like the Deepwater Horizon did.
History repeats itself.
What forces are at work to alter the movement of the sun? And how does that affect the rotation and orbit of the other spherical planets?The sun travels in a circle, as described by others. This is the reason there is not a 180 degree difference between rise and set. At different times of the year, the sun's orbit is smaller or larger, so this angle changes.
Please show that this is the case.If Antarctica were not out of bounds
Why isn't it dispelled with live video from space?and the Earth was a sphere, belief in flat-Earth could quickly be dispelled.
Links please.There are no (reliable) videos of 24 hour sun-light in Antarctica, and earlier (more reliable) explorer accounts indicate night-fall when there should have been 24 hour day, if the Earth were a ball.
See above.Why ban people from Antarctica, if NASA and Co. have nothing to hide?
Creationist dentist Jack Cuozzo wrote a book wherein he claimed that, despite being given permission to examine some Neanderthal fossils in Paris, that for some reason he decided to go at night, and was chased by gun-wielding anti-creationists or Police or whatever his fantasy-driven mind could come up with. Don't think he ever explained why, after being given permission, they would then try to shoot him... especially when his thesis was so stupid (Neanderthals were just really old bible-times people with arthritis).Flerfers believe you can't even get close enough to the "ice wall" to photograph it would NASA chasing you or killing you or whatever, much less travel there.
What forces are at work to alter the movement of the sun? And how does that affect the rotation and orbit of the other spherical planets?
Please show that this is the case.
How is this relevant?What forces are at work to alter the movement of the sun? And how does that affect the rotation and orbit of the other spherical planets?
Please show that this is the case.
Quite strange that a treaty prohibiting exploration would be signed by so many countries, no? What business is it of theirs?I could only find a treaty in which certain areas are off limits to tourists.
The NASA moon landing fraud? Can't trust that organisation for anything. Remember, science is testable and repeatable, not testable and repeatable by NASA only. An independent video, maybe? But wait. Local regulations usually prohibit space flight/exploration by individuals.Why isn't it dispelled with live video from space?
Just a PR scheme to save face, now that most thinking people realise NASA was just a scam. As above, I'd trust an independent video, but not one from an agency whose existence depends on the fable of space.
One is an artefact, presumably owned by someone. The other is a vast expanse of no-man's land. Different situations.Using your logic - why ban people from seeing the Ark of the Covenant if there is nothing to hide?
Remember, science is testable and repeatable, not testable and repeatable by NASA only.
An independent video, maybe? But wait. Local regulations usually prohibit space flight/exploration by individuals.
Just a PR scheme to save face, now that most thinking people realise NASA was just a scam.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?