Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Lucy herself is a contradiction.
She has a smaller skull, with bipedal hips.
To get around this contradiction, Lucyferans say she demonstrates bipedalism came before increase in brain size.
Check out the pelvis shape:
Comparison:
why are we even talking about Lucy? She's one of a dozen or more of her species we found.
I believe she is still the most complete adult specimen, but I could be wrong.
But since of course they are actually merely different breeds of chimp,
Where did you provide evidence of this?
Where have you provided evidence they are not breeds different breeds of chimp or human?
Blah blah blah dogs blah blah something vaguely racist about Asian people.
EDIT: Ahahahahaha holy crap I was right.
Your claim. Your burden of proof.
When did Asian mating with African become racist? Are you a racist person believing that other races mating is a bad thing? Probably from the sound of it, since you believe someone saying Asian and African mating is raciest. Would you feel better if I said Caucasian and Mexican instead?
You claimed months ago Darwin's Finches are separate species. Fulfill your prior burden and I will happily fulfill my later one. Or is it you can't and so wont provide that definition?
Aren't they called "favoured races"?You're the one calling them "breeds". Implying "interbreeding".
You're the one calling them "breeds". Implying "interbreeding".
When did Asian mating with African become racist?
You claimed months ago Darwin's Finches are separate species. Fulfill your prior burden and I will happily fulfill my later one. Or is it you can't and so wont provide that definition?
How do you figure that? The biological classification of breeds has nothing to do with that at all. Merely what we call infraspecific taxa of domestic animals instead of races as we do humans - when both mean the same thing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breed
"that distinguish it from other organisms of the same species"
The truth is you just want an excuse to ignore the data and so tried a strawman.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(biology)
"of interbreeding individuals within the same species,"
Actually its you using race that implies interbreeding and therefore racism in your world. So argue against yourself.
H. erectus is not an Asian or African H. sapiens.
Already provided it several times. I define species by gene pool. If a significant amount of population specific mutations are able to accumulate, then they are separate species. I also stated quite clearly that incipient speciation can be reversed. I also stated that speciation is a spectrum of interbreeding, not a binary event.
Of course, you have ignored it every time I have defined it.
Now, prove that A. afarensis mated with chimps. Your claim, your burden of proof.
That's fine. I'll sit over here and not be racist in a thread about dinosaurs.
I know, it's neither one of those, just as a Native American or Caucasian or European or whatever, isn't an Asian or African either - just another infraspecific taxa of the species. So being that all observation goes against your claims of separate species - why are you still attempting to spread that Fairie Dust?
So in other words after you searched about 25 or 30 different scientific definitions of species you realized none of them agree with you.
Because you still have not provided the "scientific definition" just your own personal opinion - which means nothing in a discourse on science. So what are you up to now, 32 links or so that all went against your claims - and so continue to avoid providing that scientific link?
I never claimed it mated with chimps. Husky mate with Husky until we force them to mate outside their infraspecific taxa or forced to by natural circumstances. So why would I think they mated with a chimp? That's your strawman.
Apparently you fail to realize still it takes two different infraspecific taxa to make a third - with the third being neither of the other two - nor does the third ever mate with the other two - unless circumstances force them to or suitable partners are not present. But the third always remains the same species.
Why? You'll just get those classifications wrong too and call different infraspecific taxa separate species. No worse - you'll call babies and adults of the same species different species... All because you refuse to apply what you observe in real life to that fossil record.
I know, it's neither one of those, just as a Native American or Caucasian or European or whatever, isn't an Asian or African either -
So being that all observation goes against your claims of separate species
So in other words after you searched about 25 or 30 different scientific definitions of species you realized none of them agree with you.
Because you still have not provided the "scientific definition" just your own personal opinion -
. So what are you up to now, 32 links or so that all went against your claims - and so continue to avoid providing that scientific link?
I never claimed it mated with chimps. Husky mate with Husky until we force them to mate outside their infraspecific taxa or forced to by natural circumstances. So why would I think they mated with a chimp? That's your strawman.
Apparently you fail to realize still it takes two different infraspecific taxa to make a third -
Why are the hip bones so different from chimps if they are just different breeds of chimp.Where have you provided evidence they are not merely different breeds of chimp or human?
Now that sounds rather like flaming.Did you believe a closing post would get your Fairie Dust passed by?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?