Trump Plans To Take Contol and Rebuild The Gaza Strip.

[Deborah1$]

Then Terrorism functions properly in serving it's purpose, which is to control all those outside of it's scope through the fear of violence.

...I say *dont* listen, and return fire whenever, and wherever terrorism occurs, everytime, 30x worse. Eventually, terrorism will lose, or we'll all die trying - because we can't all be held hostage by the fear of terrorism forever. It's not part of God's plan for us.

Let the fear be on them!

I'm a veteran. I have no problem with responding to terrorism with the appropriate amount of force. When terrorists attack, my idea would be to wipe them off the face of the earth. I have a problem with unnecessarily inviting terrorism due to a bad idea. Biden's reluctance to engage and rein in the Houthi's and other terrorist groups fueled their aggression. A rapid and costly response would have caused them to know the U.S. would not tolerate continuous attacks. Trump certainly isn't Biden, but he has not thought through all the consequences that go with "taking over" Gaza. And if there is money enough for that kind of scheme, then that same money needs to be spent here in our country to remedy some of the problems we have like rebuilding cities and towns ravaged by natural disasters. What happened to concentrating on lowering prices, and helping improve the economy - the very things he was elected for. No one voted so we could have a riviera in the middle east that will only benefit the investors. If you think that money from a resort was going to go back into helping this country, then I have a bridge I want to sell you. If we have that kind of money to spare why all the talk about cutting social security and medicaid. Again, Trump is not thinking long term. He needs to chase another investment rainbow.

 

[Landon Caeli]

I'm a veteran. I have no problem with responding to terrorism with the appropriate amount of force. When terrorists attack, my idea would be to wipe them off the face of the earth. I have a problem with unnecessarily inviting terrorism due to a bad idea. Biden's reluctance to engage and rein in the Houthi's and other terrorist groups fueled their aggression. A rapid and costly response would have caused them to know the U.S. would not tolerate continuous attacks. Trump certainly isn't Biden, but he has not thought through all the consequences that go with "taking over" Gaza. And if there is money enough for that kind of scheme, then that same money needs to be spent here in our country to remedy some of the problems we have like rebuilding cities and towns ravaged by natural disasters. What happened to concentrating on lowering prices, and helping improve the economy - the very things he was elected for. No one voted so we could have a riviera in the middle east that will only benefit the investors. If you think that money from a resort was going to go back into helping this country, then I have a bridge I want to sell you. If we have that kind of money to spare why all the talk about cutting social security and medicaid. Again, Trump is not thinking long term. He needs to chase another investment rainbow.

I like this argument better than the other one at least. As long as we're not making decisions based on fear of terrorism, I can respect that.

 

[Deborah1$]

I like this argument better than the other one at least. As long as we're not making decisions based on fear of terrorism, I can respect that.

There will always be terrorism; we can't avoid it. I have a problem with response to it (or a stupid lack thereof) and openly inviting it We openly invited it when we let the border become porous under Biden's watch.. Trump's idea is openly inviting it because he is not thinking long term.

 

[Landon Caeli]

There will always be terrorism; we can't avoid it. I have a problem with response to it (or a stupid lack thereof) and openly inviting it We openly invited it when we let the border become porous under Biden's watch.. Trump's idea is openly inviting it because he is not thinking long term.

Us doing what we want, is not openly inviting terrorism... It's doing what we want.

There wasn't always terrorism either, and there doesn't have to always be terrorism - that's where you're wrong.

When the Englush took New Amsterdam from the Dutch in 1664, for example, there was no terrorism as a result.

 

[Deborah1$]

Us doing what we want, is not openly inviting terrorism... It's doing what we want.

There wasn't always terrorism either, and there doesn't have to always be terrorism - that's where you're wrong.

When the Englush took New Amsterdam from the Dutch in 1664, for example, there was no terrorism as a result.

Us doing what we want, is not openly inviting terrorism... It's doing what we want.

There wasn't always terrorism either, and there doesn't have to always be terrorism - that's where you're wrong.

When the Englush took New Amsterdam from the Dutch in 1664, for example, there was no terrorism as a result.

You are dreaming. There will always be terrorism

 

[Landon Caeli]

You are dreaming. There will always be terrorism

Just because you say it, doesn't make it so.

 

[Deborah1$]

I am defining terrorism as some type of violence. There will always be terrorism in one form or another. If you go back to Biblical times there were a gabillion acts committed by some opposing group. I'll go so far as to say even way before Biblical times. Us doing what we want, when we want, how we want usually invites a negative reaction from the other party its done to. A lot of people don't generally turn the other cheeck to a perceived action they disagree with. .

 

[Deborah1$]

Just because you say it, doesn't make it so.

I wish you were correct, but I don't believe you are. I'm going to sit back and watch what happens and think of this conversation the next time a terrorist act is committed..