I agree with many things he says on the website, but not everything.
He focuses on the wife's role and says even if the husband isn't a good husband (like if he's an alcoholic for instance) then the wife should still be submissive.
This goes along with Christ's message about being submissive to one another, (even if the other doesn't treat you the same way). But I think it isn't responsible of him to focus on the wife's submissiveness without defining the role a husband should fulfill.
If the church spent just as much time defining a husband's role as it did the wive's (since these verses get so much more attention due to women's rights) then a lot of marriages would probably be closer to being Christ-like. A marriage goes two ways and both parties need to give their 100% and know what is expected of them. If men are not properly taught by the church on how a good husband should be then that role will be open to much interpretation.
Where the bible says woman was created to be man's helper HELPER (english translation) the original actual means partner, on an equal level. I will look for my reference and translation and post it at another time.
I believe husband and wife are to submit to one another, but they each have different roles and cover different responsibilities and territory in the marriage. (makes sense when you think about it because otherwise you'd always be butting heads and/or competing).
Proverbs 31 says a few interesting things: She looks for wool and flax and works with her hands in delight....she finds a field that's for sale and buys it. She's got earnings and she plans a vineyard..she makes linen garments and sells them..and supplies belts to the tradesmen.
I found it interesting to hear his interpretation. When I read this I see the proverbs woman as a working woman and even a business woman. She earns money, buys property, makes and sells clothing, and sells belts to tradesmen.
Jesus washed his disciples feet. I find this act quite symbolic since washing feet was a woman's job at the time.
If Jesus was invited to someone's home and saw a tired woman working hard to prepare a meal for him and make him feel comfortable chances are he would tell her to rest and not go to all that trouble.
I interpret Jesus' washing of the feet as the equivalent of a husband offering to wash the dishes, for example, as an act of love and service, since it is a job that women traditionally do.
I also don't agree with his theory that the reason why there is poverty and crime amongst some minority groups is because women have taken all of their jobs. He is really jumping to a lot of conclusions on that one.
One of the main reasons why the Nazis hated the Jews during pre-WWII times is because they resented the fact that imigrants were taking their jobs. I think his theory has a few holes in it and he is making a lot of assumptions that he hasn't backed up.
He also says that the wife lives for her husband and willingly falls submissively under the leadership of her husband and seeks how she can please him.
This should be true in any good marriage. The only reason why Christ came on earth was to live and die for us and teach us God's will for our lives. This is total submission on Christ's part, in a very different way than the wive's. All of Christ's actions, decisions, motivations, intentions and sacrifices were based on the well-being of humanity, it was completely selfless. So a husband, in turn, should already be living for his wife and doing everything with her in mind.
Biblical scholars always say that to understand the bible you need to look at it as a whole and not individual verses to identify the true meaning. So if a verses tells you one thing and the other 1000 pages give a different message or makes no mention of it, you know that you need to take another look at the verse.
This is the reason why some churches think that Paul's letters are meant to address the concerns of a specific church, as some messages appear there and don't in the rest of the bible. I'm refering to the part about women not speaking in the church. I know it's a sensitive issue - I'm mentioning it so those who don't agree with it don't think that some churches ignore or change the meaning of verses because they don't like what it says, as the website made reference to.
There are parts of the old and new testaments that make reference to a few women as prophets and teachers. (I will write the verses in another post, since I don't have them on hand.) This contradicts what Paul wrote about about women staying silent in the church, so some people think that the letters were not meant to be in the bible but were meant for the problems in that specific church. (The talking has to do with women sitting together and men seperatley. During the sermon the women would often talk amongst themselves when the sermon topic was particularily interesting, so Paul instructed them to stop talking during the service and wait until they got home to ask there husbands about it).
Since women weren't educated and often couldn't read, it was a big step up for women to be told to listen and learn quietly from the service, it was an encouragement for them to learn, insteading of chatting during the service as they liked to do.