Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I got saved. He really did start too work on me from the inside out. Still under construction, of course.Remarkable. And how did you do this?
Science is like milk, not any secret where it comes from and what it is. You have stated things here that do reveal much about you.You know nothing about me and nothing about science.
I zapped it with tests six ways from Sunday.Please describe in detail these tests, including the way you made sure to avoid contamination by your own personal biases.
Why should I try to teach a pigeon to play chess?
We do have forces and laws in place right now. Really. If you want to prove that they were the same and always will be, start anytime. Why pretend you can?Sure. Tell yourself that..
I got saved. He really did start too work on me from the inside out. Still under construction, of course.
I also checked out the prophesies. No way they could be accidents. No way at all.
That's what I'm talkin bout.
Actually it takes time. Being saved is instant, but learning truth takes awhile.And in one shining moment of personal salvation you realised the bible was literally true! Prophecies and all!
What a novel method of fact checking.
Science is like milk, not any secret where it comes from and what it is. You have stated things here that do reveal much about you.
You have tried to bludgeon folks into a belief that only a same state past could be responsible for ratios for example. No rhyme or real reason was given, and you seemed unable to cope with anything from outside your little belief box.
I zapped it with tests six ways from Sunday.
Maybe it is better to pretend you can play well, and that the only reason you can't show your moves is because a pigeon is on the other side of the board. Not all folks are fooled with that nonsense though.
We do have forces and laws in place right now. Really. If you want to prove that they were the same and always will be, start anytime. Why pretend you can?
It was easy to follow. You believe that the ratios exist because of forces and laws that are now in place and no other reason. That you believe for no reason, and fanatically.I provided an explanation that any rational person could follow and understand. All you've done is make wild claims without any shred of support. Come back when you have evidence.
Nothing to do with me or myself. I did not invent Rome or Bethlehem, or Daniel, or the cross, or the hundreds of fulfilled prophesies, or the spiritual.Sure you did. Until you provide details, it means nothing. You could have read the Bible, formed your own interpretation, decided it must be true and tested it by seeing if you agreed with yourself for all I know. Come back when you have evidence.
In your dreams. Not very impressive. Come back when you can post some of this rather than drone on about it.I have. Science has.
It was easy to follow. You believe that the ratios exist because of forces and laws that are now in place and no other reason. That you believe for no reason, and fanatically.
Nothing to do with me or myself. I did not invent Rome or Bethlehem, or Daniel, or the cross, or the hundreds of fulfilled prophesies, or the spiritual.
In your dreams. Not very impressive. Come back when you can post some of this rather than drone on about it.
We all accept laws and stuff in this nature. Of course they work. The issue is how you transport them wily nily into an unknown state...where no science has gone before.No reason, huh? The reason I accept them is BECAUSE THEY WORK.
No one has to make stuff up actually. You can declare ways that this nature could have produced stuff we see. But you have no monopoly on the unknown.And because they are the only way to explain how we have the particular ratios we see.
It was not Jesus that told us that we should expect this state and world to last forever, or that it was always the same exact nature. That would be you.You would invoke a coincidence or a deliberately misleading deity.
I have a solid bible case that looks from cover to cover, past present and future! You are talking nonsense.But you did invent your interpretation.
Leonard Nemoy...'There really wasn't any Spock'.Spock: Dad's ideas are not logical.
It would have been nice to learn how he drove the enterprise. Did he share the secrets of transporting with you?Yawn. Come back when you have actual evidence, dad.
Oh, and as for Leonard Nimoy (at least spell his name right!) saying there wasn't really a Spock...
It would have been nice to learn how he drove the enterprise. Did he share the secrets of transporting with you?
We can say that the bible outlines a past and a future that is a different nature than this present state we live in now. We can say that ancient history, to some extent agrees. We can say that science doesn't know. We can say that science bases all models on this present state.
You have demonstrated an inability to look at the facts here. When ratios were discussed you seem to have slipped into some bizarre denial mode, seemingly unable to consider how forces and laws are what determine the ratio relationships!
Maybe have a rest.
Not being a Treckie, we may need to look to you for intricate parts of the fiction.Do you bother to learn about ANYTHING before you make comments about it?
Neither do you.Go get some evidence dad. You have nothing until you do.
You are my evidence. You demonstrate that science is mum on the subject. I have history and the word of God as evidence on how the past really was. You may no longer make stuff up. I am onto you.Go get some evidence dad. You have nothing until you do.
You are my evidence. You demonstrate that science is mum on the subject. I have history and the word of God as evidence on how the past really was. You may no longer make stuff up. I am onto you.
So either way we're wrong ... right?Most creationists strive in vain to prove that their belief does not violate the laws of physics whereas you have embraced the fact that such beliefs do indeed violate the laws of physics.
So either way we're wrong ... right?
And for the record, you don't have a Defender's Study Bible, do you?
The footnotes in it were written by [the late] Henry M. Morris, a respected scientist; but in the almost eight years I've been here, whenever I post one of his footnotes, the scientists here shoot the messenger, rather than address the message.
He does an excellent job explaining the Joshua passage about the sun and moon standing still, and an equally impressive job with the ringstraked cattle in Genesis; yet the scientists here harp on he having been a hydraulic engineer, rather than address what he said.
Then they wonder why we don't respect them, when all they do is manufacture Catch 22 scenarios for God and His Word, while hiding behind a No True Scotsman Principle themselves.
I'll bet you would.I've personally never heard of that Bible or Mr Morris so I'd be interested to see some of these notes
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?