• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Status
Not open for further replies.

cweb255

Active Member
Sep 22, 2004
398
14
Visit site
✟624.00
Faith
Atheist
The ironic part is that you use your own interpretation and the material in question to make your argument. It's like using the Bible as a defense for the Bible. Circular reasoning.
 
Upvote 0

St. Andrei

Active Member
Nov 16, 2004
205
2
43
Texas
Visit site
✟22,845.00
Faith
Calvinist
cweb255 said:
The ironic part is that you use your own interpretation and the material in question to make your argument. It's like using the Bible as a defense for the Bible. Circular reasoning.

I explained an apparant contradiction within the Bible. Why would I use anything but the Bible to do that?
 
Reactions: Abiel
Upvote 0

St. Andrei

Active Member
Nov 16, 2004
205
2
43
Texas
Visit site
✟22,845.00
Faith
Calvinist
cweb255 said:
What chain of events? What are you blathering about?

If you are going to insult me, then it only reveals to me that you have already made your mind up about this and refuse the option of being wrong. Nobody can reason with you if you are like that.

The chain of events (as I posted in an earlier post to you):


Does that make sense?
 
Upvote 0

cweb255

Active Member
Sep 22, 2004
398
14
Visit site
✟624.00
Faith
Atheist


Yes, I understand it, but I don't agree with it, nor does it even agree with the rest of the Bible. James 2:26
 
Upvote 0

St. Andrei

Active Member
Nov 16, 2004
205
2
43
Texas
Visit site
✟22,845.00
Faith
Calvinist
cweb255 said:
Yes, I understand it, but I don't agree with it, nor does it even agree with the rest of the Bible. James 2:26

James talks about how true faith is accompanied by good works. Fatih without works is dead. You are not justified by faith alone (that are not accompanied by works).

Paul and James agree: we are justified by faith alone, but not a faith that is alone. Look at the context of James 2 in reference to James 1
 
Upvote 0

St. Andrei

Active Member
Nov 16, 2004
205
2
43
Texas
Visit site
✟22,845.00
Faith
Calvinist
robot23 said:
i don't understand why people take the bible literally
i don't get it

1 Corinthians 1

22 For Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom, 23 but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, 24 but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men.
 
Upvote 0

Petr

Gnostic Christian
Sep 22, 2003
975
12
40
Brno
✟23,702.00
Faith
I believe that Paul's writings reflect his own experience which he felt after he chose to follow the teachings of Yeshua ha-nocri with the same zeal he used to follow the Mosaic law, and this inmense feeling of awakening Christ within himself made him write whatever he wrote. Because of the number of hands that copied and translated his letters, some things became unclear, some things were added & removed later on according to the interpretation of the scribe-translator. Paul was regarded as a great and inspired teacher among others, he estabilished many christian communities. He was never regarded as an infalliable man as our preachers are sometimes trying to depict him, hence his writings must be taken with an openminded approach, not as a literal writings of God, but as a story of a man who is describing his approach to God, which suited him well for his spiritual growth, and which he believed to be useful to others too.
 
Upvote 0

St. Andrei

Active Member
Nov 16, 2004
205
2
43
Texas
Visit site
✟22,845.00
Faith
Calvinist
Petr said:
He was never regarded as an infalliable man as our preachers are sometimes trying to depict him,

Whatever preachers do that are not consistent. Paul even himself (Romans 7) declares his sinful nature.


His writings are not literal writings of God, but were certainly inspired by God. Paul taught doctrine and that doctrine (being inspired by God) should be considered infallible, regardless of whether our texts today are 100% accurate to the texts back then or not (and I readily admit that they aren't).
 
Upvote 0

cweb255

Active Member
Sep 22, 2004
398
14
Visit site
✟624.00
Faith
Atheist
Paul taught his own doctrine of the inspiration of God. God didn't inspire his writings, he was inspired to write because of God.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.