Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Contact them. Good luck.Wow. I would love to sit down and debate these guys or anyone who agrees with their point of view.
Hilarious. I see why you suggested people start listening at 4:45. So we'd skip over the part where the discussion is about how unethical it is for a medical professional to publicly speak about a "diagnosis" of a person they've never met, much less diagnosed.You can see or read mental health experts speaking about it online. Or you can go to YouTube and find several psychiatrists talking about it there. Or you can read the Book "The dangerous case of Donald Trump", The book's editor Dr. Brandy Lee showcases 27 psychiatrists who openly talk about it. Here is a short interview with Lawrence O'Donnell.
Go to 4:45 if you're in a hurry.
I did not think you could lower my opinion of Glenn Beck's intellect (or is it honesty). I've listened to long segments of Trump speaking this year, he often does not make much sense.Or you could go to Glenn Beck's radio program and hear how much sense Trump has been making in his bid to become president.
I can evaluate Trump's words on my own.Or you could go to Glenn Beck's radio program and hear how much sense Trump has been making in his bid to become president.
Let's see your credentials.I can evaluate Trump's words on my own.
Seems less abnormal? He is normal and they are abnormalFirst off, I wouldn't "take off all the transgender stuff", because that is one huge sticking point for people. (to many people, a narcissistic blow-hard like Trump seems less abnormal to them than what they perceive as "men in the womens changing room"). You can't hedge with taking out one of the key things people are divided over.
And bogus lawsuits...That'd be like saying "Ignoring all the criminal activity and dog whistles for a moment, what's so bad about Trump?"
Apart from that...
Politicians giving lipservice to the "defund the police" movement and BLM, advocating for late-term elective abortions and drifting away from "safe, legal and rare" to "shout your abortion", student loan forgiveness (in an educational environment that's drifted consistently left for the last 10 years), proposals for unrealized capital gains taxes, "Cancel culture" efforts, expanding multi-culturalism, calling people bigots if they want stronger borders...
That is what basically happened with all the law suitsThere's a key difference between how conservatives and progressives view each others movements.
While conservatives tend to realize that the progressive "movement" doesn't live or die with any one person, progressives tend to not realize that about conservatives. Progressives tend to talk as if "If Trump never existed, none of this would be happening". When, in reality, there would've just been another "Trump'ish" person to fill that void.
His rise to power didn't happen in a vacuum. It's not as if it's a situation where if there was no Trump, conservatives would've been magically laid back abut rapid changes pertaining all of the aforementioned, all within a 4-year time window.
But to circle back around, my response to the other poster was still valid... Protestors barking outside of the HQ's of places like NY Times and WaPo, claiming that those kinds of publications are "sane-washing" and/or normalizing Trump is, like I said, misdirected anger.
You and I can disagree about "Left's policies making Trump seem more normal to the right-wing" vs. "Trump does it so much, people are desensitized"...whether I'm right, or you're right...either way, the protestors in question are wrong. Whatever the cause is of the "perceived Trump normalizing", it's certainly not the publications that have been calling him a unique threat for the last 4 years.
NY Times has ran pieces about him being "thuggish", "autocratic", "having the capacity to upend democratic norms", uniquely racist, "representing all that is wrong with the American right", "Jim Crow 2.0", etc...
What else, exactly, do these protestors want the NY Times and WaPo to say about him? Are they just wanting them to run a hit piece called "Trump: The New Hitler" before they'll be satisfied with NY Times' coverage about him?
Ahh yes. Shroedinger's diagnoses.I'll wait for his/her medical degree to be posted before I accept that.
Is that what you thought? That's not God talking to you.Hilarious. I see why you suggested people start listening at 4:45. So we'd skip over the part where the discussion is about how unethical it is for a medical professional to publicly speak about a "diagnosis" of a person they've never met, much less diagnosed.
I agree with Vivek Ramaswamy. It is not democrat or republican anymore,really. It is the "managerial class" That don't trust the people to vote. Dick, liz Cheny types, on republican side, and RFK, Tulsi Gabbard et. Democrat side.That's is why I call their view of the world delusional. In a way they are brainwashed. It is very hard to deprogram a person who has convinced himself/herself that they have the absolute truth. Even when presented with the true situation they will mentally refuse to concede.
Which is also the reason why so many of them act irrationally aggressive towards others.
Of course you're not fascist. No well adjusted person will even say that. Don't burden yourself with thoughts of your own inequities, the fault is clearly theirs. Anti-fascist using tactics a fascist would use is not an untrue observation from bias perspective. I can say that for I'm not American, I support neither the Red nor the Blue team. I only observe.
But to be fair both sides have people who - how should I call it - unhinged. It is sad that regular folks like yourself are caught up in the middle.
People don't need credentials to spot malignant narcissism.Let's see your credentials.
Better than medical diagnosis being done by randos on the internet, right?Ahh yes. Shroedinger's diagnoses.
That's science for ya! Anything else is misinformation, or "repeating false claims".That's the cool thing. A psychopath isn't a psychopath until an official diagnoses.
Well, what do you want me to do other than subscribe to what I hear on the news about how only a person licensed by the government can truthfully tell me about someone's health?So long as Trump NEVER gets a mental health assessment or appropriately assessed, he behaves appropriately and respectfully with other people. He can continue to demonstrate ALL the symptoms...
But now SUDDENLY the "anti-elitists" will only listen to an "elitist" doctor.
Welcome to a world where only government-approved people have a voice that should be listened to.That's how mental health works I guess.
Maybe in your own mind. But if you expect to have credibility, you need government-issued credentials. Anything else is not science.
Anybody can spot a Malignant Narcissist. how to spot a malignant narcissistMaybe in your own mind. But if you expect to have credibility, you need government-issued credentials. Anything else is not science.
He's demonstrating the behaviours whether he's diagnosed or not.Better than medical diagnosis being done by randos on the internet, right?
He's demonstrating the behaviours whether he's diagnosed or not.That's science for ya! Anything else is misinformation, or "repeating false claims".
After months and years of diagnosing Biden with Dementia, suddenly right wingers only listen to "doctors". Pulease.Well, what do you want me to do other than subscribe to what I hear on the news about how only a person licensed by the government can truthfully tell me about someone's health
People are smarter than you and know more than you on certain topics. Deal with it. I have. Mental health is something I am fairly well versed in but I know enough to trust trained psychologists.Welcome to a world where only government-approved people have a voice that should be listened to.
To be fair, sometimes the victims of those people are the last to recognize the diagnoses.Anybody can spot a Malignant Narcissist. how to spot a malignant narcissist
Maybe in your own mind you think nobody can without a license.
The person who wrote that article got all their education from San Diego State University, which is not known for conservative views. I view her viewpoint as being suspect. Plus, you cited an internet source, which is not scientific.Anybody can spot a Malignant Narcissist. how to spot a malignant narcissist
Maybe in your own mind you think nobody can without a license.
None with credentials are here.He's demonstrating the behaviours whether he's diagnosed or not.
Enough that more than a few psychologists have made those connections and suggested those as possible diagnoses.
According to who? People who claim Trump to be guilty of things whether he's been convicted of them or not?He's demonstrating the behaviours whether he's diagnosed or not.
After those same months and years of being told Biden is "full of energy and sharp as a tack", suddenly Left wingers.....well, you get the idea.After months and years of diagnosing Biden with Dementia, suddenly right wingers only listen to "doctors". Pulease.
Let the trained psychologists show their credentials here.People are smarter than you and know more than you on certain topics. Deal with it. I have. Mental health is something I am fairly well versed in but I know enough to trust trained psychologists.
He speaks about political things, which he has already shown knowledge of by actually being president for 4 years.I'm sure you'd trust trump over pretty much any actual expert on anything...though I'm happy to be wrong.
"Victims" who understand that a diagnoses hasn't actually been made, unless randos on the internet are somehow to be considered doctors as long as they are commenting on medical issues.To be fair, sometimes the victims of those people are the last to recognize the diagnoses.
Does being antifascist also mean I can safely be anti-Communist as well .............?
I'm asking because I'm just wondering how a firmly "anti-fascist" position works itself out in real, democratic time and space.
Haven't we in the U.S. been "anti-fascist" for several decades now already?
So? The world is bigger, and FAR better informed, than Christian Forums.None with credentials are here.
According to his behaviours. What do you mean?According to who?
Show me the healthcare professionals who agreed with your diagnoses....After those same months and years of being told Biden is "full of energy and sharp as a tack", suddenly Left wingers.....well, you get the idea.
John GartenerLet the trained psychologists show their credentials here.
Malignant Narcissism: Does the President Really Have It? – High Conflict InstituteJohn Gartner, Ph.D., is a psychologist who taught at Johns Hopkins University Medical School for 28 years. He says yes, the president has malignant narcissism, as follows in his chapter in the book Rocket Man: Nuclear Madness and the Mind of Donald Trump (2018):
Pffft. No he doesn't. Not according to experts.He speaks about political things, which he has already shown knowledge of by actually being president for 4 years.
A diagnoses isn't a requirement to victimize people."Victims" who understand that a diagnoses hasn't actually been made, unless randos on the internet are somehow to be considered doctors as long as they are commenting on medical issues.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?