yea so their making a new star trek movie which supposed to deal with a younger kirk and spock set a few years before the original series and a few years after enterprize kinda inbetween. what do you guys think?
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
star trek XI.. anyone looking foward to it?
- Thread starter wiggbuggie
- Start date
TwistTim
Whimsical, Witty, Wacky, Waiting, Wise Guy
- Jan 27, 2007
- 3,667
- 618
- 44
- Faith
- Calvinist
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Constitution
meh. I'd love to see a Star Trek show without a 95% human crew.... Come on, after Nemesis there is certianly room for a favorable Romulan cast member or three, throw some Remans in(as red shirts).... maybe a Klingon or two, a Human, an Lal type Android (looks humanoid, isn't), a Frenegii(sp), and send them to the Beta Quandrant ....maybe even a Brikar and some other rarer species....
that I would love to watch.....
that I would love to watch.....
Upvote
0
merseyferrier
Active Member
- Sep 21, 2006
- 38
- 6
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Episcopalian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
It's hard to picture Kirk and Spock without picturing Shatner and Nimoy .Someone at the Trek BBS suggested Matt Damon as young Kirk, which I personally like; I've been a Damon fan since I saw The Rainmaker in eleventh grade. I read recently, though, in the new Star Trek magazine that the prequel is just a rumor. Regardless, I'm very much looking forward to it. This will be the first Star Trek movie to be released that I'll be able to see. Until 2004, I was associated with a Pentecostal church that banned movie-going.
Upvote
0
Similar threads
