Stanford Study: 18 Trump Rallies, over 30,000 testing positive, 700 deaths

[jgarden]

Stanford Study Seeks to Quantify Infections Stemming From ...
www.nytimes.com › U.S. › Politics
1 day ago — They compared the 18 counties where Mr. Trump held rallies with as many as 200 ... restrictions and the health consequences of transmission, and as an economist, I take that debate ... Michael D. Shear contributed reporting.

Trump rallies linked to thousands of COVID-19 cases, study ...
www.aljazeera.com › news › 2020/10/31 › trump-rallie...
1 day ago — Donald Trump's election campaign rallies have been linked to tens of ... expert at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, described the report as ... but hard to completely isolate the specific impact of one event without ...

Are Trump's rallies spreading coronavirus? Why it's ... - Reuters
www.reuters.com › article › are-trumps-rallies-spreadin...
10 hours ago — Stanford University economists estimate that President Donald Trump's campaign rallies ... But so far, scientists have not been able to get a good read on their impact, in ... an infectious disease expert at Johns Hopkins Center for Health ... Reporting by Julie Steenhuysen in Chicago and Carl O'Donnell in ...

Are Trump's rallies spreading coronavirus? Why it's hard to ...
nationalpost.com › pmn › health-pmn › are-trumps-rall...
9 hours ago — Why it's hard to know the full impact ... In recent months, Trump has held several dozen rallies in states such as ... Adalja, an infectious disease expert at Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. ... (Reporting by Julie Steenhuysen in Chicago and Carl O'Donnell in New York; Editing by Daniel Wallis) ...

Study links Trump rallies to more than 700 Covid deaths ...
www.politico.com › news › 2020/10/31 › trump-study-...
1 day ago — President Donald Trump's campaign rallies between June and ... The findings illustrate the risks of not heeding public health warnings to wear ...

Trump rallies led to 700 COVID-19 deaths, study says - Los ...
www.latimes.com › science › story › super-spreading-tr...
22 hours ago — A Stanford study of 18 Trump rallies held in the midst of the pandemic ... A rigorous attempt to gauge the after-effects of 18 of the president's reelection rallies, ... quickly” and continued rising for at least several weeks, the researchers reported. ... Residents might have had higher rates of underlying medical ...

Donald Trump's Campaign Rallies Are Now Confirmed Public ...
www.newyorker.com › news › campaign-chronicles
Oct 10, 2020 — Donald Trump's Campaign Rallies Are Now Confirmed Public-Health Hazards ... when the first confirmed cases of the coronavirus were reported in ... But those same local officials will be left to deal with the consequences.

Health official: Trump rally 'likely' source of virus surge
apnews.com › article
Jul 8, 2020 — OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — President Donald Trump's campaign rally in Tulsa in ... Tulsa County reported 261 confirmed new cases on Monday, ...

Community outbreaks of Covid-19 often emerge after Trump's ...
www.statnews.com › 2020/10/16 › trump-campaign-ral...
Oct 16, 2020 — These good-faith attempts to adhere to public health guidelines paid off. ... Concerned about the impact of Trump's campaign rallies, Majumdar ...
**********************************************************************************************************t****
A recent Stanford Study has attempted to determine the medical impact of 18 Trump political rallies, otherwise known as "super-spreaders!"

THE GOOD NEWS: they are responsible for over 30,000 COVID-19 infections and 700 related deaths

THE BAD NEWS: the numbers of infected and deaths don't include those Trump rallies in October and November where daily rates of COVID-19 across the nation have doubled and tripled

 

[cow451]

Spreader-in-Chief. Captain Contagion.

 

[SeventyOne]

Stanford Study Seeks to Quantify Infections Stemming From ...
www.nytimes.com › U.S. › Politics
1 day ago — They compared the 18 counties where Mr. Trump held rallies with as many as 200 ... restrictions and the health consequences of transmission, and as an economist, I take that debate ... Michael D. Shear contributed reporting.

Trump rallies linked to thousands of COVID-19 cases, study ...
www.aljazeera.com › news › 2020/10/31 › trump-rallie...
1 day ago — Donald Trump's election campaign rallies have been linked to tens of ... expert at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, described the report as ... but hard to completely isolate the specific impact of one event without ...

Are Trump's rallies spreading coronavirus? Why it's ... - Reuters
www.reuters.com › article › are-trumps-rallies-spreadin...
10 hours ago — Stanford University economists estimate that President Donald Trump's campaign rallies ... But so far, scientists have not been able to get a good read on their impact, in ... an infectious disease expert at Johns Hopkins Center for Health ... Reporting by Julie Steenhuysen in Chicago and Carl O'Donnell in ...

Are Trump's rallies spreading coronavirus? Why it's hard to ...
nationalpost.com › pmn › health-pmn › are-trumps-rall...
9 hours ago — Why it's hard to know the full impact ... In recent months, Trump has held several dozen rallies in states such as ... Adalja, an infectious disease expert at Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. ... (Reporting by Julie Steenhuysen in Chicago and Carl O'Donnell in New York; Editing by Daniel Wallis) ...

Study links Trump rallies to more than 700 Covid deaths ...
www.politico.com › news › 2020/10/31 › trump-study-...
1 day ago — President Donald Trump's campaign rallies between June and ... The findings illustrate the risks of not heeding public health warnings to wear ...

Trump rallies led to 700 COVID-19 deaths, study says - Los ...
www.latimes.com › science › story › super-spreading-tr...
22 hours ago — A Stanford study of 18 Trump rallies held in the midst of the pandemic ... A rigorous attempt to gauge the after-effects of 18 of the president's reelection rallies, ... quickly” and continued rising for at least several weeks, the researchers reported. ... Residents might have had higher rates of underlying medical ...

Donald Trump's Campaign Rallies Are Now Confirmed Public ...
www.newyorker.com › news › campaign-chronicles
Oct 10, 2020 — Donald Trump's Campaign Rallies Are Now Confirmed Public-Health Hazards ... when the first confirmed cases of the coronavirus were reported in ... But those same local officials will be left to deal with the consequences.

Health official: Trump rally 'likely' source of virus surge
apnews.com › article
Jul 8, 2020 — OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — President Donald Trump's campaign rally in Tulsa in ... Tulsa County reported 261 confirmed new cases on Monday, ...

Community outbreaks of Covid-19 often emerge after Trump's ...
www.statnews.com › 2020/10/16 › trump-campaign-ral...
Oct 16, 2020 — These good-faith attempts to adhere to public health guidelines paid off. ... Concerned about the impact of Trump's campaign rallies, Majumdar ...
**************************************************************************************************************
A recent Stanford Study attempting to determine the medical of 18 Trump's political rallies, otherwise known as "super-spreaders," have placed the death total at 700 - and that's just to the end of September!

If you actually read the abstract to the study, you'll find that to be a guess extrapolated from assumptions. Then they assume others who didn't attend who may have caught it from those who did. They then take both guesses and add them together to get the 700. Fake news intended to sway the ignorant prior to election day.

 

[jgarden]

If you actually read the abstract to the study, you'll find that to be a guess extrapolated from assumptions. Then they assume others who didn't attend who may have caught it from those who did. They then take both guesses and add them together to get the 700. Fake news intended to sway the ignorant prior to election day.

1) Given that Stanford consistently ranks among the top 10 universities in the world, they didn't attain that position by creating "Fake news intended to sway the ignorant prior to the election!"

2) It isn't as if this was some study that supposedly came from the hard-drive of one of the President's sons, then mysteriously fell into the possession of Biden's personal lawyer - Trump and his supporters would have every reason to dismiss it as "fake news" and "intended to sway the ignorant!"

3) This President and his Campaign have been well aware for months that these "in-person" political rallies without masks and personal distancing were widely considered to be "super-spreaders" by the medical community - they can't claim ignorance!

4) Trump Rallies have been in the habit of having those in attendance sign medical waivers absolving the President of any legal responsibility should they contact COVID-19 - that constitutes an open admission that they knew these "super-spreaders" constituted a major public health risk

5) this President and his supporters are more than welcome to provide their own reputable medical studies that refute the Stanford one, but until that happens this is the most accurate account available

6) this President and his Campaign made a calculated decision that they would never be actually be held responsible for the medical impact of in-person rallies intended to satisfy the personal ego of just one individual - the Stanford study provides the human costs associated with that callous calculation

 

[rambot]

If you actually read the abstract to the study, you'll find that to be a guess extrapolated from assumptions. Then they assume others who didn't attend who may have caught it from those who did. They then take both guesses and add them together to get the 700. Fake news intended to sway the ignorant prior to election day.

I read the abstract. Honestly your response to it sounds FAR more like you are trying to placate (or sway) the ignorant.
Summarily dismissing this report means you better do more than just mischaracterizE their evidence as "a guess".

I would like to see a thorough critique of their methodologies please or I will assume you don't actually understand what you qrote.

Besides if their methods are weak they'll get ripped apart in peer review and never be able to get decent work again.

 

[MIDutch]

If you actually read the abstract to the study, you'll find that to be a guess extrapolated from assumptions. Then they assume others who didn't attend who may have caught it from those who did. They then take both guesses and add them together to get the 700. Fake news intended to sway the ignorant prior to election day.

Yes, it's just science and research.

And we all know how anathema science and research are to certain segments of the population.

 

[Triumvirate]

This is what happens when you get high on your own supply of misinfo.

You ended up infecting your support base at big, inadequately shielded rallies.

Choices have consequences.

 

[jayem]

Donald Trump’s idea of rounding the curve is actually skidding off the road at breakneck speed, sending busloads of his supporters over a cliff.

 

[iluvatar5150]

Donald Trump’s idea of rounding the curve is actually skidding off the road at breakneck speed, sending busloads of his supporters over a cliff.

Trump Team rounding the curve:

Fauci offering guidance to Trump:

 

[Triumvirate]

Donald Trump’s idea of rounding the curve is actually skidding off the road at breakneck speed, sending busloads of his supporters over a cliff.

Can't round any more corners if you're off the road

 

[jgarden]

This is what happens when you get high on your own supply of misinfo.

You ended up infecting your support base at big, inadequately shielded rallies.

Choices have consequences.

Surely this President and his Campaign weren't that irresponsible as to organize dozens of large, in-person political rallies in the middle of a Pandemic until they were assured concerning the safety of the participants based on their own medical studies!

Presumably they would want to establish that the safety of such rallies without the benefit of masks and social distancing could be justified based on a scientific, fact-based analysis, that could later be used to counteract any future criticisms that these were COVID-19 "super-spreaders!"

Now would be the perfect time for this President to produce such studies to set the record straight, refute this dastardly Stanford "misfo," and to demonstrate that Trump had a genuine concern for the health of his own supporters!

 

[cow451]

Surely this President and his Campaign weren't that irresponsible as to organize dozens of large, in-person political rallies in the middle of a Pandemic without conducting their own prior medical studies!

Presumably they wanted to reassure themselves with an opinion based on science that rallies without masks and social distancing would be not only be safe, but to counteract any future criticism that they were serving as COVID-19 "super-spreaders!"

Now would be the perfect time to produce those studies to set the record straight, refute this dastardly Stanford "misfo," and to demonstrate that Trump had a genuine concern for the health of his own supporters!

We all know the Trump campaign is staffed by the brightest minds...