- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,733
- 52,529
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Don't forget signs everywhere that should be found that read: NOAH PASSED BY HERE.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Don't forget signs everywhere that should be found that read: NOAH PASSED BY HERE.No need for flights of fantasy about a catastrophe that did not happen.
Just for one, there would be a world wide 'flood stratum" that would be easily distinguished.
There isn't.
There should be lots of sediment on the ocean floor, not just on land. There isnt.
You forgot to account for the Australian worm snakes.
Oh yeah, the millions and millions of years answer is the only possibility.I just pointed out " uniform distribution" is a crock,
and that distribution by known means is sufficient
anyway.
Why does science ignore the possibility of violent eruptions and cooling during a catastrophic flood causing the formation of polar ice?What are you referring to?
The presence of microbe throughout the planet? (They've been evolving for billions of years. Plenty of time to spread out.)
The distribution and genetic relations of particular microbes?
Something else?
Oh yeah, the millions and millions of years answer is the only possibility.
There are varying opinions to that from scientists who don't have to have it so to protect TOE.For the measured rock layers? Yeah, it is.
There are varying opinions to that from scientists who don't have to have it so to protect TOE.
Yes, I have read accounts that dispute that age and claim the layers were laid down rapidly.Seriously? Is there really variation in the age of (for example) the K-T boundary at 66 Mya among scientists?
Are you now suggesting that an entire field of scientists -geologists - are conspiring and falsifying their results because the "true results" would show the ToE wrong?There are varying opinions to that from scientists who don't have to have it so to protect TOE.
Nope, I think they believe it to the point that in every case they interpret it in a way that protects TOE.Are you now suggesting that an entire field of scientists -geologists - are conspiring and falsifying their results because the "true results" would show the ToE wrong?
Are you suggesting that you somehow now these "true results" - despite geologists publishing "falsified results"?
But you know better? Better than the entire field of geologists combined?Nope, I think they believe it to the point that in every case they interpret it in a way that protects TOE.
Nope, but I don’t think for one minute that mainstream scientists are going to remotely accept something that would prove them DAs… do you?But you know better? Better than the entire field of geologists combined?
I hope you will stop that "only millionsOh yeah, the millions and millions of years answer is the only possibility.
DA?Nope, but I don’t think for one minute that mainstream scientists are going to remotely accept something that would prove them DAs… do you?
I will try my best, but I assure you that the expression was/is mostly for expediency and nothing personal.I hope you will stop that "only millions
oh years possible" thing.
I'm not wedded to one idea.
Nor do I ever do "only possibility".
The day I am is the day my integrity dies.
If you can accept that, and can say the
same for yourself, we can continue, with
a sensible and respectful discussion.
It wasn't especially respectful to hand
wave a reasoned response to your
question, with an untruth about me
personally .
What expression would you use.... oh, never mind, we may have made a colossal mistake.DA?
Your charge that all "mainstream"
geologists are intellectually dishonest
is not reasonable. And it's certainly
not supporting evidence for any
radical concepts in geology.
Show us actual research data that supportsYes, I have read accounts that dispute that age and claim the layers were laid down rapidly.
Nope, if you truly believe something you're not falsifying.You are charging falsification.
It might be beneficial for you to research in a different way than you normally do.Show us actual research data that supports
this and disproves all the data for annual layers.
Anyone can write " accounts" of anything they like.
Sans data, it's just words like a " flood water to Neptune"
account.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?