• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,686
7,908
...
✟1,323,209.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Not really. Most churches these days teach a sin and still be saved belief (i.e. Belief Alone-ism).
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,686
7,908
...
✟1,323,209.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
John the Baptist was against Belief Alone-ism. He said to the Pharisees “do not think to say within yourselves we have Abraham our father.” For they thought they were saved by simply being sons of Abraham.

For it is written:

“Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance: And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father...”
(Matthew 3:8-9).

Jesus was against Belief Alone-ism.

The Pharisees said,
“...Abraham is our father.”

Jesus said unto them,

“If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.” (John 8:39).

So if you want to know that God is against Belief Alone-ism, just remember the number 39.

Matthew 3:9.
John 8:39.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Sam91
Upvote 0

Sam91

Child of the Living God
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,351
8,150
42
United Kingdom
✟102,616.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
For starters, I see no Biblical argument in favour of imputation of Christs (or God’s) righteousness to the believer.
As much as I disagree with the OP I think that comes from 2 Corinthians 5:21

Personally, I prefer to think of being clothed in Christ and that still seems a wonderous privilege.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,255
6,246
Montreal, Quebec
✟304,970.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
As much as I disagree with the OP O think that comes from 2 Corinthians 5:21

Personally, I prefer to think of being clothed in Christ and that still seems a wonderous privilege.
I believe that Paul is saying we become agents for implementing the righteous plan of God. I gave studied this isue deeply: I do not see how Scripture teaches that we are imputed with Jesus’s righteousness. I agree we are imputed the status of righteousness, but not Christ’s righteousness.
 
Reactions: Sam91
Upvote 0

Sam91

Child of the Living God
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,351
8,150
42
United Kingdom
✟102,616.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Without having studied it persay, Christ's righteousness is the embodiment of Holiness and something to be held in reverent awe. When one speaks of it I think it ought not to be done lightly and in complete humility and love to those around them and with thankfulness to God that His righteousness saves us. I think that's why I prefer to think of myself as clothed in Christ. It reminds of His provision, Lordship and makes me feel safe, sheltered by Him and humbled.
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,717
5,558
46
Oregon
✟1,103,786.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
The free gift of God is that He has forgiven our previous sins. But he requires that we stop committing them.
It is how that is done or accomplished that determines whether or not it is truly heresy or not.

And if it is done by primarily "you", etc.

In that case, you fall into a trap and are voluntarily deceived by a self-deception, and will think you are seeing success with sin when it is actually quite the very much exact opposite, etc.

Which really upsets me when I see people like this, etc, and especially when they are spreading it, promoting it, and teaching it, etc...

As it very well should, etc...

And if it's offensive and "stinks" to me, I can almost guarantee you it is or does to God too.

Might as well spit in His face and stomp on His book, etc.

They seem completely unaware that they are not only making their own sin worse, but others sins as well, completely unaware that they are not walking in "the true way", etc, oblivious to the damage they are doing, and they are not teaching or promoting Christ or the true Gospel at all, but an "anti-Gospel", and are actually going against Christ, and everything He taught or wanted to happen with us, and some of them, might even be "anti-Christ"...

God Bless!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,717
5,558
46
Oregon
✟1,103,786.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
All God and none of you, or it's rubbish, garbage, dirty filthy rags, etc, guarantee you "stinks" to God and is an "offensive odor" in His nostrils, etc...

Either God does the work in and through you, and it's not you doing it, or He doesn't...

You choose.

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0

DeepWater

Just The Truth
Aug 6, 2011
508
358
Israel (usually)
✟16,539.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
In Relationship
I've read the bible. Most every version. Believe me, you are wrong.

I don't say that to you directly, but to those reading what you've written. I don't want them led astray.

Listen Heretics...

"Pauline Theology" does not lead anyone astray. Trust me.
Its all i teach.
And the reason you don't know what that is, most of you, is because you have never had a real born again Teacher show you the most basic and simple truths "baby christian" truth's regarding WHAT PAUL TEACHES, as "justification by Faith" that came from Jesus Himself.
Paul said, "be followers of Me, as i follow Christ".
Thats what i do, and the reason you don't, is because you don't know what you are doing, much less what to BELIEVE.......
See, and UNDERSTAND that i only teach the prime principle of the Grace of God, as given ONLY To Paul, by Christ, Directly.

The reason that 70% of the NT is penned by Paul, is because God anointed this Apostle, above all others to be the one who delivers all the doctrine of "justification by Faith" to the Church.
Everything we understand about the "blood atonement", "the gift of Righteousness", "faith without works", "justification by faith".. the understanding that water baptism can't save anyone..
Everything that REAL BORN AGAIN CHRISTIANS are to understand regarding HOW and THRU WHOM Salvation is delivered to us.... Comes from the TEACHING OF PAUL.
And that is what im giving you. So, you think you are fighting me, but you are actually fighting Paul's Truth. You are contradicting the CROSS

So, HERETICS.// before you jump in with something else that is your "works for salvation" based idea that rejects the NT, let me stop you, as you and others here are about to talk about PETER and Acts 2:38, which is not the Gospel, but is the preaching message of John the Baptist....."repent and be baptized"......That is what he was preching to ISRAEL.
So, do you hear anything about "believe on the Lord JESUS", in the words "repent and be baptized"?
NOPE.
And that dying Thief on the Cross, who BELIEVED ON JESUS, and was born again....Was he water baptized on that Cross for the "remission of His sin"?
NOPE.
NOT QUITE....... So be careful with what you try to teach, HERETICS.....so that you are not found lying again about how salvation is gained, and by what MEANS.

And let me tell you 2 more things regarding Peter...

1.) Acts 10, is about 10 yrs after Jesus ascended back into heaven... And GOD had to teach PETER , by a VISION, that Gentiles could be saved, as Peter didn't know it yet. So, obviously he didnt know anything YET about the Grace of God., 10 yrs after Christ is back into Heaven.... Later in Acts 15, when Paul got together with all the Apostles, they were taught "Pauline Theology", same as im teaching you HERE.

2.) IN 2nd Petter. .. Peter says that Paul's LETTERS are "SCRIPTURE"......equal to the TORAH.
See, there was no New Testament written at that time.....
So, here you have an original Apostle, who is stating that the words written by another Apostle, who was NOT one of the Original 12, ..= that Paul's letters are EQUAL TO THE TORAH..= SCRIPTURE.
And now, we see that Peter was right.....as Paul is the author of 70% of the New TESTAMENT SCRIPTURES>.

Cross Rejectors here, who are always found creating devil inspired chaos on Christian Forums, are ALWAYS FOUND trying to save themselves with their works.
They have rejected Christ's Blood as the ONLY THING THAT GOD Accepts to redeem you and keep you redeemed... So, all you HERETICS would do well to be quiet and listen to what im teaching, as im only teaching what Paul teaches... to try to show you why and how you have "fallen from GRACE".
You need to get yourself off the Cross, and stop contradicting it with your LIST of self saving DEEDS.
You need to do it today.
 
Reactions: IntriKate
Upvote 0

IntriKate

Active Member
Nov 23, 2019
388
445
.
✟113,264.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Of course God wants us to follow his commands but he knows we can try and may fail and keep trying that’s why he died for us so that in our weaknesses he is our strength. He sees the heart and our intentions and he loves us even in our failure.
 
Reactions: Emsmom1
Upvote 0

lsume

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mar 14, 2017
1,491
696
71
Florida
✟440,618.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
First as I pray you know, those who are Truly enlightened understand and hear only The Truth from Christ. This cannot be explained to anyone who has not experienced it for themselves. Your introductory description sounds very nice though doubtful that it’s real anywhere.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,255
6,246
Montreal, Quebec
✟304,970.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Wow, quite the sermon.

I politely suggest I am not the only reader who has noticed that your general tone is quite patronizing towards those who might have a different interpretation of Biblical texts than you.

In any event, I think I am prepared to challenge you on a number of points of theology in the interest of mutually converging on Biblical truth.

Two points to begin with:

1. I do not believe that scripture teaches that believers are imputed with the righteousness of Christ (or, equivalently, God the Father). I know this is a widely-held doctrine but some respected theologians (e.g. NT Wright) challenge it. I believe we are indeed imputed a status of righteousness, but it is not the righteousness of Christ or God.

2. Work and Salvation: I believe that Paul has been largely misunderstood in the reformed tradition. When he denies "salvation by works" - which I agree he certainly does - I suggest that context shows that he is talking about salvation by keeping the dictates of the Law of Moses; he is not, I suggest, denying that we need to live moral lives to be saved. Quite the contrary: In Romans 2:6-7, and elsewhere, Paul clearly affirms that we need to "persist in doing good" in order to be granted final salvation. Now, obviously, Paul also clearly asserts that our justification and salvation (not the same concepts, albeit linked) are based on faith alone. Well, we can talk about how these seemingly contradictory positions can be reconciled without have to deny that works do indeed matter.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,255
6,246
Montreal, Quebec
✟304,970.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
NT Wright is a respected theologian who argues against the traditional reading of this text. I could try to give his full argument but, to make things easier on all, I will start with a single statement of his that captures his interpretation of what "becoming the righteousness of God" really means in this text:

What the whole passage involves, then, is the idea of the covenant ambassador, who represents the one for whom he speaks in such a full and thorough way that he actually becomes the living embodiment of his sovereign

I do not expect anyone to uncritically accept this interpretation. For starters, let's at least try to agree on what Wright is saying. And then we can debate whether he has a solid case or not. I think that the above statement from Wright is at least understandable (even you do not agree with him).
 
Upvote 0

St. Helens

Reformed Baptist
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
CF Staff Trainer
Site Supporter
Jul 24, 2007
61,683
10,109
Lower Slower Minnesota
✟1,420,811.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
ADMIN HAT ON
Thread locked. SoP violation:
  • It is permissible to discuss biblical/historical topics that may include inflammatory words or phrases as long as the usage of these words does not specifically flame any CF recognized Nicene group or denomination or insinuate that they are not Christians. Please use these words and phrases with caution.
  • Examples of inflammatory words/phrases (including but not limited to): idolaters, false/different/other gospel, false prophet, false doctrine, heretics, blasphemers, evil, sheep in wolves clothing, different God, antichrists, Antichrist, cannibalism/cannibal (concerning Eucharist), Judaizer.
ADMIN HAT OFF
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.