- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Electric Sceptic said:Nope, it's science, rather than your 'spiriscience'.
[Ok, longs as it isn't your 'weirdocrapobeliefinanythingbutGodo' usual stuff!]
Umm...you said it was a 'total flop'. [The so called stuff, based on disbelief in God, and belief only in some alwayswashere physical only, yes, a real flop! Real here and not, hot, sexy science, why, hec, we loves it.]
Just liek your personal belief that there was ever a 'spiritual'.
[Yes, belief is belief. Why don't you crawl out from under you mother science's dress, and admit yours? Or is it so disgusting, you know the reaction it will get?]
Same goes to you, with your 'spiritual'.
[If you can't prove it, then, excellent! Enjoy your PO belief, and wild dark dreams of some imagined, unprovable, Godless, physical only, decay and death filled past!]
Not a single one of which has ever been verified.
[By a single one like you!]
And who completely disagree with you regarding religion.
[ Good. I'm not into religion, just faith in God, and the bible, and tha God of love, and His only begotten Son]
Not a single one exists. We do not - and cannot - know where, if anywhere, they went.
[Too bad, I can. Just look for the simolarities in thousands of case studies of people even from different religions, and backgrounds, and countries. No, I guess you're right. You can't know]
A resurrection from the dead CLAIMED to have been witnessed by unknown writers two thousand years ago.
[Not unknown to me. Apostles, desciples, and holy men and women of God, who did miracles, and gave their lives trying to tell evreyone they could. Martyrs, whose testimony was so important, they gave their lives to prove it. All documented in the world's most well kept document, the holy scriptures!]
Just like you with your belief that there is/was a spiritual world.
[Don't make it sound like it is something only I believe in. Most people on earth do know there is a spiritual dimension]
.
Hey electric, your posts get more shallow each time here, sounds like you ran out of steam.
.Nathan Poe said:You're not advanced enough to do this, either, but that hasn't stopped you from making this up.
[Actually, once you shed the limitations of the box, and look at the bible, we become somewhat qualified. Infinitely more so than those bound to the box]
Except they ignore the possibilty that those people might not have it wrong...
[Once we have met the Author of the book, and come to know Him, whom to know, is to love, that He could be wrong does not possibly enter the equation. It becomes a known Quanity!]
It already is developed. It is what they learn, if interested, in heaven now, as we speak! The only way we can get even a pre taste of it in this sad ol physical only world here now, is to humbly seek Him, look to His word, and see what bits we can learn of it. Taking some attitude of, well, if this science 'wins me a lottery, wipes my unmentionable for me, lifts me up to a roof top, and helps me sell lots of vacuum cleaners, only then, will I descend from my little throne, and consider it--won't get one very far.enlightenment said:Well, dad, you certainly do think outside the box. Now, tell us how you intend to develop this new field of spiritual science. I propose that the first test we do on it is with a levitation experiment. What do you think?
dad said:Ok, longs as it isn't your 'weirdocrapobeliefinanythingbutGodo' usual stuff!
No science is based on disbelief in god. That's another one of your strawmen.dad said:The so called stuff, based on disbelief in God, and belief only in some alwayswashere physical only, yes, a real flop! Real here and not, hot, sexy science, why, hec, we loves it.
Science isn't my mother. There's nothing disgusting about either my mother or science. What are you talking about?dad said:Yes, belief is belief. Why don't you crawl out from under you mother science's dress, and admit yours? Or is it so disgusting, you know the reaction it will get?
dad said:If you can't prove it, then, excellent! Enjoy your PO belief, and wild dark dreams of some imagined, unprovable, Godless, physical only, decay and death filled past!
dad said:By a single one like you!
You are completely into religion. You even want to abandon science when it conflicts with your religion.dad said:Good. I'm not into religion, just faith in God, and the bible, and tha God of love, and His only begotten Son
No, you can't. Nobody can.dad said:Too bad, I can. Just look for the simolarities in thousands of case studies of people even from different religions, and backgrounds, and countries. No, I guess you're right. You can't know
dad said:Not unknown to me. Apostles, desciples, and holy men and women of God, who did miracles, and gave their lives trying to tell evreyone they could. Martyrs, whose testimony was so important, they gave their lives to prove it. All documented in the world's most well kept document, the holy scriptures!
It IS something you believe in. The fact that most people on earth believe there is a spiritual is no evidence that that belief is correct. Particularly since most of them would wildly disagree with you about it.dad said:Don't make it sound like it is something only I believe in. Most people on earth do know there is a spiritual dimension
Nice little ad hominem, to hide (yet again) the fact that despite repeated requests, you haven't come up with a single tangible thing about your 'spiriscience'. It's STILL just 'science except where it conflicts with MY beliefs, then we abandon science because I say so."dad said:Hey electric, your posts get more shallow each time here, sounds like you ran out of steam.
Now, would you like some tangible thing about some things about the spititual? Shows how much you retain, of what is going on here. Tell you what, bring me a ghost, dress it up, and I'll tell you if it's real. We'll try to tickle it, pickle it and put it in a test tube.Electric Sceptic said:[/color]
There is no 'weirdocrapobeliefinanythingbutGodo' involved in or associated with science. [ Who said anything about science? Come on out, and talk like a man]
Nice little ad hominem, to hide (yet again) the fact that despite repeated requests, you haven't come up with a single tangible thing about your 'spiriscience'. It's STILL just 'science except where it conflicts with MY beliefs, then we abandon science because I say so."
Now, would you like some tangible thing about some things about the spititual? Shows how much you retain, of what is going on here. Tell you what, bring me a ghost, dress it up, and I'll tell you if it's real. We'll try to tickle it, pickle it and put it in a test tube.
We both did. It's what we've been talking about for this entire thread. Have you forgotten?dad said:Who said anything about science? Come on out, and talk like a man
I, and others of this thread, have been begging you to provide some tangible thing about some things in the spiritual. You said you could; you haven't. Despite repeated requests.dad said:Now, would you like some tangible thing about some things about the spititual?
Yes. I retain it well. I recall all of your prevarications and evasions.dad said:Shows how much you retain, of what is going on here.
If that's the best way. YOU are the one who said the spiritual was repeatedly testable - you have yet to come up with a single repeatable test. Now you have the audacity to act as if we are asking for something unreasonable, when all we are asking for is what YOU said you could provide.dad said:Tell you what, bring me a ghost, dress it up, and I'll tell you if it's real. We'll try to tickle it, pickle it and put it in a test tube.
dad said:1: How long did it take? [My opinion so far id that it took from the fall, to the days of Peleg]
2: Why was it a gradual and not instantaneous process? [You would have to know something of the spiritual world to answer that]
"Get through?" You make it sound like it's more difficult for God to interact with the physical-only universe. Surely you're not putting limits on God's powers?3: What happened to the planet while the split was occurring? If pre-split and post-split science follow different rules, then how did the physical and spiritual behave during the split itself? [ With the spiritual being a part of the fabric of our universe, as well as physical. God still talked, and walked with men (not that He doesn't still get through somewhat)
Lifespans beings some ten times longer, gravity being affected, decay process changed, light of a spiritual nature that was not limited in speed, and much more.
[/QUOTE]The laws of the universe themselves were not at all the same as physical only laws now are alone.]
And of course, the question on everyone's mind:
4: If the split was gradual, then what about your alleged merge?
[I think that there may well be a transition phase during the millenium. Some scriptures of this time seem to indicate some changes. So this is a thousand year period. At the end of this we have the eternal new heavens and earth, and New Jerusalem comuing down to earth forever]
The problem is that the Bible only mentions a couple of specific people by name; you're assuming that their ages were the norm. They may have very well been the exception.
[Whoa! No, more than a couple, everyone just about who was mentioned at all, it was very much the norm]
Jesus is going to have his hands full if the merge causes the laws of physics to go loopy during "the transition."
[Loopy? No more loopy than in the pre flood days. Believers who are saved, during this time, will not be here on earth in mortal bodies any more, but with the Lord, in His city already. The transition is only for the world, we will already be living in the spiritual]
Not at all, I get the gist of your little story just fine. It's even easy to understand that you actually believe it's true. Your emotionally invested after all. The point is that just making things up is not science.dad said:It does take some adjusting getting your head around the fact that there was a merged universe, doesn't it.
Which is why your god is impossible.Yes, with God, indeed, literally, all things are possible, He is really Almighty.
That is the point.dad said:The laws of the universe themselves were not at all the same as physical only laws now are alone.
.Freodin said:That is the point.
For one thing, it destroyes the "the universe is fine-tuned for human life" argument. That is a yec-internal problem, dad does not have to be bothered with it...
[ No, not at all! When He left us in a physical only, it was tuned for us. The wonderful thing is, so will the merged one be!]
But the problem that remains is: the laws are different - in what way?
[Every way. To understand this in detail, you would have to also understand the spiritual, and compare the differences. I don't think you can, or do?]
You have to consider that you cannot just take one "law" of physical science, and change it - they are all interconnected. So if you want to change one laws, you have to change them all.
[Of course, the very fabric of the universe, no small deal, God, the spiritual world, and the fantastic, wonderful merge!]
But in what ways where they different? And here the real, big, bad problem of dad´s ad-hoc spiritual science shows: He does not know how they were different. [No. You do not know. We believers have somesmall idea] All that he can say is that they were so different that they allowed for all kind of wierd (of course, physical-only-wierd) things, like million tons of water (liquid!) hanging around in orbit and trees, mountains and humans growing in seconds to unknown heights - [?? Where did a human grow in seconds? Or a mountain? If the continets slid apart, I could see some ranges being piled up, and formed quickly, yes. ]but normal (physical-only-normal ) enough to allow for "life" to exist and be recognizable as "human".
[Of course the merged is much like the physical. Just as Jesus' body was much like before He ressurected, but also very different. He could still eat, and touch, and talk, and many things, but He also had spiritual qualities. Think of it more as gaining something wonderful, than losing our humanity.]
In which way this "spiritual science" is different from magical handwaving is beyond me.
[Good choice of words. Beyond you. But not beyond men, if they are believers, with His help]
dad said:It already is developed. It is what they learn, if interested, in heaven now, as we speak! The only way we can get even a pre taste of it in this sad ol physical only world here now, is to humbly seek Him, look to His word, and see what bits we can learn of it.
Taking some attitude of, well, if this science 'wins me a lottery, wipes my unmentionable for me, lifts me up to a roof top, and helps me sell lots of vacuum cleaners, only then, will I descend from my little throne, and consider it--won't get one very far.
A levitation experiment? This is to prove God? Well, Jesus levitated up into the sky. There you go, glad thas all you needed.enlightenment said:If this world is only physical (meaning that the spiritual is not accessible to us), then there cannot be a spiritual science. Science is something you can perceive and test and manipulate.
Well, amen, dad...and hallalujah. That makes no sense, and you completely failed to answer my question. Please try again.
STILL waiting for any of dad's supposed 'tests' of spiriscience that he bragged exist...dad said:A levitation experiment? This is to prove God? Well, Jesus levitated up into the sky. There you go, glad thas all you needed.
Now as far as spiritual science in heaven, no, it is not accessible to you. But there are bits we have access to. Differences between the two, for one thing, some properties of the spititual, and the merged for another. A history of the world and universe for another. Lists of local interferances, called miracles for another. Properties of pre physical only light for another. Yes, we do have some real good clues, and enough to study, that will blow the lid off box science!
God can be tested. He works. Laws of the spirit, etc. I gave you a test, now, don't try to slink out of your homework. I asked you to test how men could live forever. This is a basic trait of spiritual beings. Now, can you give us the results of your tests? I have lots more lined up, awaiting your ability to do the easy, basic test here.Electric Sceptic said:STILL waiting for any of dad's supposed 'tests' of spiriscience that he bragged exist...
You have not given any test. You have claimed that the spiritual is testable; despite repeated requests, you have not given a single example of such a test. Perhaps if you ever get out of your box you will be able to actually support your claims or, at least, admit they are false.dad said:God can be tested. He works. Laws of the spirit, etc. I gave you a test, now, don't try to slink out of your homework. I asked you to test how men could live forever. This is a basic trait of spiritual beings. Now, can you give us the results of your tests? I have lots more lined up, awaiting your ability to do the easy, basic test here.
Now, if you say you just can't do it, why would you be chompin at the bit, pretending God ought to 'bring em on'?! The issue here is your ineptness, not whether the spiritual exists. Many scientific betters of yours have already admitted this. It does exist, so your empty negative pretense at bravado, merely highlights the contours of your physical only prison.
Sorry you are stumped at not being able to do a simple thing like test the basic trait of the spiritual world! There is only so much I can give you, as an unbeliever, because you do not accept things from the bible, or miracles, Jesus spiritual laws, etc. Your abilities are so low, and box bound, that it seems you have made the choices to continue looking only to physical science, and embracing affectionately the so called aspects of it, that try to carry box logic into an unboxed past! Enjoy your faith, cause thats all it is. A faith that renders you forever incapable in this life of progressing to understand even a little more. While many things can be tested, you have positioned yourself so low, as to be unable be shown anything out of the box at all. But don't think that all men are so bound, they aren't.Electric Sceptic said:You have not given any test. You have claimed that the spiritual is testable; despite repeated requests, you have not given a single example of such a test. Perhaps if you ever get out of your box you will be able to actually support your claims or, at least, admit they are false.
Please also note that I have nowhere claimed that the spiritual does not exist; this is merely yet another of your strawmen.
dad said:Sorry you are stumped at not being able to do a simple thing like test the basic trait of the spiritual world! There is only so much I can give you, as an unbeliever, because you do not accept things from the bible, or miracles, Jesus spiritual laws, etc.
Your abilities are so low, and box bound, that it seems you have made the choices to continue looking only to physical science, and embracing affectionately the so called aspects of it, that try to carry box logic into an unboxed past!
Enjoy your faith, cause thats all it is. A faith that renders you forever incapable in this life of progressing to understand even a little more.
While many things can be tested, you have positioned yourself so low, as to be unable be shown anything out of the box at all. But don't think that all men are so bound, they aren't.
To summerize, physical only science cannot be applied to Adam's world, because it was together with the spiritual, as evidenced by many goins on then that would be impossible only in our physical only.
My present feeling is that the split started at the fall, and was complete in the days of Peleg, which covers the flood period as well. Then, our physical only universe we now are in. This will start to transition to a combined or merged universe soon, at the start of the millenium. It will be complete, and merged at the end of this period, forever to be merged, and never again will there be a physical only universe!
Oh, electric, if you have some disputes, try biting your tongue on the vitrolic rhetoric, and empty so called science flag waving, and provide some bible or science evidence these things are not so! Sorry you are unable personally, to test it seems even the basics of a spiritual world, but, as your post said, you never claimed that the spiritual does not exist!!!
I don't know if I'm 'stumped' or not, since you haven't given a single test of any trait of the spiritual world. You keep claiming these tests exist, but you can't provide any.dad said:Sorry you are stumped at not being able to do a simple thing like test the basic trait of the spiritual world!
"Only so much" appears to be "zero".dad said:There is only so much I can give you, as an unbeliever, because you do not accept things from the bible, or miracles, Jesus spiritual laws, etc.
Nice dodge to avoid - as you have now spent two different threads doing - supplying any support for your claims.dad said:Your abilities are so low, and box bound, that it seems you have made the choices to continue looking only to physical science, and embracing affectionately the so called aspects of it, that try to carry box logic into an unboxed past!
I have no faith.dad said:Enjoy your faith, cause thats all it is. A faith that renders you forever incapable in this life of progressing to understand even a little more.
That's nice. As soon as you provide any of these tests you claim exist, then perhaps we'll see. However, since you apparently can't, all of your claims about the testability of the spiritual are dubious at best.dad said:While many things can be tested, you have positioned yourself so low, as to be unable be shown anything out of the box at all.
So far all you've demonstrated to me about 'all men' is that some of them like to make claims they can't support.dad said:But don't think that all men are so bound, they aren't.
Yeah, yeah, heard all that before. Claims without any supporting evidence are useless.dad said:To summerize, physical only science cannot be applied to Adam's world, because it was together with the spiritual, as evidenced by many goins on then that would be impossible only in our physical only.
YOU are the one who makes claims; it is up to YOU to provide support for them, not up to others to disprove them.dad said:Oh, electric, if you have some disputes, try biting your tongue on the vitrolic rhetoric, and empty so called science flag waving, and provide some bible or science evidence these things are not so!
So far the only reason I'm unable personally to test even the basics of the spiritual world is because the person who keeps talking about the repeatable tests of the spiritual won't reveal what they are. He's been claiming they exist for over a week now, but he won't provide any of them. Makes you suspect he's just full of it, wouldn't you say?dad said:Sorry you are unable personally, to test it seems even the basics of a spiritual world, but, as your post said, you never claimed that the spiritual does not exist!!!
dad said:A levitation experiment? This is to prove God?
Well, Jesus levitated up into the sky. There you go, glad thas all you needed.
Now as far as spiritual science in heaven, no, it is not accessible to you.
But there are bits we have access to. Differences between the two, for one thing, some properties of the spititual, and the merged for another. A history of the world and universe for another. Lists of local interferances, called miracles for another.
Properties of pre physical only light for another. Yes, we do have some real good clues, and enough to study, that will blow the lid off box science!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?