No truth? You have been shown plenty of physical evidence. You have just confirmed what I wrote earlier. You just dismiss it.
Speaking of truth, let's try some here. I dismiss nothing in the way of physical evidence, despite science dismissing the more important part of the equation, the spiritual.
I accept radioactive decay, distant stars, present light, and it's properties, tree rings (especially the kind that actually exist), present plant growth and evolution rates, and life spans, and ways DNA act, and etc.
Don't pretend otherwise.
Your ideas that you just make up based on your interpretation of scripture are ad hoc.
False. I both accept the scriptures, and look at what we actually know in science, rather than dismiss the scriptures, and look at what we do not know, as so called science does. We do know there is decay, and certain laws and forces that govern how nuclear reactions must now occur, for example. By the same token I do not accept that the new heavesn of the bible, coming when these ones pass away, are bound to the same rules. That is elementary. If they were the same, they woulldn't need to pass away!! Neither could I allow so called science to wave away that new universe coming, or how it will work, simply because of narrow minded religious dogma, believing that what we see is what we will also get always. That is absurd, and baseless, and in no way science.
You make up the context and then tell us about it. Nice.
Pointing out the obvious, that is supported solidly by scripture, and all evidences is not making up context.
If science cannot tell us about anything that matters, why do you keep asking us to provide it to you?? This is my point.
Because it has been taught as if it did matter in the bible and creation history. If a man comes to my door selling tickets to a cheap cruise, I have a right to determine if the vacation package is real, or just a scam, based on nothing, but an attempt to collect money. Science has been peddling an alternate creation story, and presenting it for sale, but it is a scam.
You are probably bored, llike AVET. Or you consider yourself God's prophet and need to tell everyone else your made up stories for self fulfillment.
Presumpteous nonsense.
Sure, show you "stuff to support it" that isn't in text books, or the scientitifc literature either, right?
No. Using the present as the key to the past is in the books, as are all the insane conclusions built up on the premise. Alll you need to do is defend what is preached.
'Cause you will just dismiss it all if we do.
Hard to say, since it has never been done yet.
In other words, you won't accept anything we show you. I will ask you one more time. Why Should We Bother? The game is up. No one wants to play with you anymore. What will you do to show you are God's Special Prophet now?
Being a graceful loser is a good thing for busted so called science devotees, I would think. It is in no way a question of
bothering, it is a matter of it can't be done. It hasn't been done. So I would respect more an honest attitude, and not strange mud slinging.
I don't care if the ones with a defeated case bother to say anything. All that needs be done is roast their case on a different state past spit. And wash the sories in lack of proof soap, and hang them out to dry.
That way lurkers who are honest will look into it. Maybe ask honest questions, some of them.
In other words, since the so called science defenders have come up empty, they deserve to be talked at over their heads, and directly to others.
By the way, your dendrochronologist friend, what happened!? He dropped the ball? -- Others brought up old old old roots, as dated, yet failed to verify it.
