Sorry, Yet Another Evolution Post!

[Mechanical Bliss]

I have seen this semantic ploy before as I have met scientists who reject evilotion of course the establishment say they are nolonger scientists cause they deny evilotion.

No, they are no longer scientists because they do not practice science. Some even claim that regardless of the evidence (which is what science is all about--evidence), they believe in young earth creationism because of their theological beliefs, not science.

Again you have 200 yearold proof of creation being false tell me what it is?

http://www.christianforums.com/t41209

Are you going to address this or continue to ignore it?

Almost two centuries ago Reverend Adam Sedgwick (a geologist) admitted that the geologic record did in no way support a global flooding event, and the age of the earth was then found to be much older than 6000 years.

 

[notto]

I have seen this semantic ploy before as I have met scientists who reject evilotion of course the establishment say they are nolonger scientists cause they deny evilotion. Again you have 200 yearold proof of creation being false tell me what it is?

Give any name you want who has actual experience in biology and rejects evolution for some other reason other than their religious beliefs and I will consider them a scientist. That should release you from needing to worry about a semantic ploy.