Sorry, here's another one.

[JulySheMustFly]

I am curious with all the homosexuality threads why I haven't seen many comments about how physically we are not designed for it. It is always about God says its wrong put that aside for a minute. Men and women fit together.

(I don't feel like atatching a whole bunch of disclaimers about how I feel about homosexuality so have at it if you want.)

 

[dujavi]

I am curious with all the homosexuality threads why I haven't seen many comments about how physically we are not designed for it. It is always about God says its wrong put that aside for a minute. Men and women fit together.

(I don't feel like atatching a whole bunch of disclaimers about how I feel about homosexuality so have at it if you want.)

From a moral/ethical perspective the thing that matters is whether or not we should be sodomists. Not why. Right? Personally and bibically sodomy is wrong and should be outlawed. As you said it goes against God's design. Since one of the reasons for marrage is reproduction, if you can't reproduce it's not marrage.

 

[flicka]

From a moral/ethical perspective the thing that matters is whether or not we should be sodomists. Not why. Right? Personally and bibically sodomy is wrong and should be outlawed. As you said it goes against God's design. Since one of the reasons for marrage is reproduction, if you can't reproduce it's not marrage.

Excuse me????

 

[flicka]

I am curious with all the homosexuality threads why I haven't seen many comments about how physically we are not designed for it. It is always about God says its wrong put that aside for a minute. Men and women fit together.

(I don't feel like atatching a whole bunch of disclaimers about how I feel about homosexuality so have at it if you want.)

Because there is alot more to love than the physical aspects. It's more emotional than anything else. If it's just a matter of 'fitting together' you should be ok w/any guy on the planet.

 

[JulySheMustFly]

From a moral/ethical perspective the thing that matters is whether or not we should be sodomists. Not why. Right? Personally and bibically sodomy is wrong and should be outlawed. As you said it goes against God's design. Since one of the reasons for marrage is reproduction, if you can't reproduce it's not marrage.

Wow, can't agree with you there. Just because you can't reproduce doesn't mean you aren't married. That would suggest your unity is not accepted in the eyes of God. Are you sure you want to say that?

 

[JulySheMustFly]

Because there is alot more to love than the physical aspects. It's more emotional than anything else. If it's just a matter of 'fitting together' you should be ok w/any guy on the planet.

Maybe I should change my original to be about sex with the same sex and not homosexuality.

I think it is very possible to deeply love a person of the same sex and commit to having a non-sexual relationship with them. I love my husband enough that if it were to be wrong for me to have sex with him we would still be married and have an intimate emotional relationship.
(this is not a thread about the rights of homosexuals to be legaly recognized in marriage.)

I am wondering if by the anatomy of the human body alone if having sexual relations with a person of the same gender would be wrong.

 

[dujavi]

Wow, can't agree with you there. Just because you can't reproduce doesn't mean you aren't married. That would suggest your unity is not accepted in the eyes of God. Are you sure you want to say that?

Not oftan do people change there minds on cf. But I think you are right to correct me. Reproduction isn't the only reason to get married, and is not required.

 

[hernyaccent]

I "fit" perfectly with my girlfriend. Sex isn't solely about reproduction for most including christians. Men and women born with sexual organ problems and deformities don't "fit" but they have other types of sex. I don't think it's fair to hold us gays and lesbians up to a standard that heterosexuals themselves don't adhere to. Our relationships are no different then heterosexual ones. We date. We fall in love. We commit. Our relationships are for love. If I never engaged in sexual acts with my girlfriend I would still be with her because that isn't what's important so the "don't fit" argument doesn't even apply.

 

[Ampoliros]

I am wondering if by the anatomy of the human body alone if having sexual relations with a person of the same gender would be wrong.

Anatomy doesn't really determine right or wrong. That said, however, it is important to note that heterosexual couples can engage in pretty much every type of sex that homosexual couples can. The only vague way that you might consider it wrong is if you think that sex is only for procreation; in which case, anything outside a man and a woman having sex for children would be wrong.

 

[hernyaccent]

Maybe I should change my original to be about sex with the same sex and not homosexuality.

I think it is very possible to deeply love a person of the same sex and commit to having a non-sexual relationship with them. I love my husband enough that if it were to be wrong for me to have sex with him we would still be married and have an intimate emotional relationship.
(this is not a thread about the rights of homosexuals to be legaly recognized in marriage.)

I am wondering if by the anatomy of the human body alone if having sexual relations with a person of the same gender would be wrong.

What about heterosexual non-traditional sexual practices?

 

[JulySheMustFly]

heterosexual non-traditional sexual practices: I'm still storting that out too, that is why I am asking these questions. If having sex with a person of the same sex is wrong, then using anything other than traditional intercourse would be wrong. I am searching anwers.

 

[loriersea]

Most gay and lesbian people don't seem to have much of a problem "fitting" with their partner.

 

[Becky153]

Gross...but anyway, it is labeled as a sin in the Bible, which frankly means that it's not right.

 

[hernyaccent]

Gross...but anyway, it is labeled as a sin in the Bible, which frankly means that it's not right.

The question wasn't about the bible but anatomy.

 

[Monica02]

What about heterosexual non-traditional sexual practices?

Also a sin unless accompanied by non-contracepted intercourse.

 

[morningstar2651]

Also a sin unless accompanied by non-contracepted intercourse.

What if the guy doesn't climax?

 

[hernyaccent]

Also a sin unless accompanied by non-contracepted intercourse.

I am aware of the catholic view point on this issue. I think the OP wants an anatomical view point.

 

[fillerbunny]

Ignoring the fact that the government has no business whatsoever legislating what two consenting adults happen to do in their bedrooms- because you think it's 'icky', or for any other reason- if you were going to outlaw non-procreative sex between homosexual individuals on the grounds that it's non-procreative, you would also have to disallow any other type of non-procreative sexual activity.. regardless of whether or not it offends your sensibilities.

So, in addition to heterosexuals being restricted to sexual activities that are strictly procreative in nature, you've got the issue that some heterosexual individuals can't procreate. If you or your husband happened to be infertile, no sex for you! Once you reach an age where your body is no longer capable of procreating, no more sex! Have a medical problem that prevents you from carrying a child? No sex for you, either. Don't want any more children? You guessed it.

What if you or your husband were injured in such a way that your bodies no longer "fit" together in the procreative sense? Should you be barred from further sexual intimacy because you no longer have the "right" parts, because you don't "fit" in a biological sense? What about children who are born intersexed, or with genitals that otherwise don't match the standard? Should they be prohibited from engaging in sexually intimate relationships when they grow up because their bodies 'don't fit' in the classic sense, or they're unable to produce offspring?

 

[Arnold_Philips]

No oral sex then.

 

[Cian]

Maybe I should change my original to be about sex with the same sex and not homosexuality.

I think it is very possible to deeply love a person of the same sex and commit to having a non-sexual relationship with them. I love my husband enough that if it were to be wrong for me to have sex with him we would still be married and have an intimate emotional relationship.
(this is not a thread about the rights of homosexuals to be legaly recognized in marriage.)

I am wondering if by the anatomy of the human body alone if having sexual relations with a person of the same gender would be wrong.

The human body allows for female-female or male-male sex to be just as pleasurable and fulfilling as heterosexual sex.