Even you guys use Him in science; ever heard of El Niño?
Science is well-known to use the names of gods or other mythological personas of all varieties for naming things.
Mars, the Oedipus Complex, and the Prometheus Project are examples.
The Bible itself has withstood far more serious critical examination then anyone on these forums can possibly manage. The Bible has stood the test of time and weathered the many attacks on it's historical veracity better then any from antiquity.
If you are ever seriously interested in learning what an actual examination of the Bible as history includes let me know. Until then have fun with these fallacious rhetorical ploys, I don't know why but it seems to please your secular masters.
Have a nice day
Mark
Actually, he was more like an unemployed construction worker.Well, he was a carpenter.
The Greeks examined the Bible 2500 years ago with great skepticism. The Bible stands the test of time just fine. It is science that can not stand up to the test of time.We've only been closely examining it with skepticism for a few hundred years
The Greeks examined the Bible 2500 years ago with great skepticism. The Bible stands the test of time just fine. It is science that can not stand up to the test of time.
Saying that "the bible has stood the test of time" is a false assertion.
We've only been closely examining it with skepticism for a few hundred years and only stands up because people have placed more value in faith than evidence, so, when it comes time to decide if the bible is historically accurate, those people choose faith to make their assessment, not evidence. Av is a good example.
But what is funny is that among those with the most resources and a vast collection of artifacts to perform such tests and truly examine the evidence, ahem, the RCC, a large number of higher clergy have determined that the bible fails as a historical or literal document.
To them, it holds allegorical and metaphorical truths, but isn't, at least regarding the OT, a reliable document for determining historical events or their true outcomes.
As far as I'm concerned, my obligation to the discussion ended when I showed Christ in secular writings -- as in the calendar.
Even you guys use Him in science; ever heard of El Niño?
That's your problem, not mine.
Yes:Ever heard of the La Niña winds?
Ya -- like El Niño and La Niña.
Those names are allowed in science books; but that's as far as it goes.
It's okay to preach science in church, but preach church in science and scientists will eek and ook about it.
Unless, of course, the main Players are reduced to monikers.
Hold on a second, bro.
This isn't just any weather pattern, this is La Niña!
You know who La Niña is, don't you? Jesus' sister!
These guys would have a fit if anyone said that Katrina was sent from God, but higher academia names these weather patterns after El Niño and La Niña, and they don't bat an eye.
Keep the Ten Commandments off the courthouse lawns, take IN GOD WE TRUST off our coins, don't teach God in science class; but deep in the halls of higher academia, God gets ridiculed so subtlety, these guys don't even know it.
So when does God take on a physical form? or are you just making things up?Only God in His physical form is beyond sight of human eyes,
Moses had all of God's plan of salvation. But a lot of what we receive from Moses was what the Bible refers to as shaddow and types. So "600 years" later when Jesus came we have a lot better of a understanding. Clearly you are learning new things about the Bible every day. WE all are learning more and more. There was a lot the disciples of Jesus did not understand. They did not understand about the diet laws, they did not understand about God's plan for the Gentiles and so on. Just like there are things that we are learning today and trying to understand. Most people have a very long way to go just to begin to understand what God reveiled to Moses 3500 years ago.Yes, I would be skeptical examining a book that would not be compiled for another 600 years myself.
Accurate and factual has never been a problem. The problem seems to be in the ability people have to be able to understand the Bible. Now we have a better understanding then ever before, but people want to hold onto their traditions. Eden was all about biodiversity. Evolution teaches us a lot about biodiversity. But people still do not get it. They still do not understand what Eden was all about.
You do not think that Jesus existed? You do not believe that Jesus was a real person? As far as walking on water, we are told that Peter was briefly able to walk on water. But not for long because he did not have enough faith. You should be able to relate to Peter. Every now and then you will briefly start to see it. Then you lose your faith and you start to sink and go back into the dark water of doubt and unbelief.means that Jesus walked on water? Or even actually existed?
You do not think that Jesus existed? You do not believe that Jesus was a real person?
So can I cite these facts as scientific evidence that these people had their souls moved into a UFO in the Halle-Bopp comet? Yes or no?
Are you suggesting that we should listen to one of the greatest men of science and what he tells us about this subject?
Sorry I can not focus on a question that is based on absurdity. Perhaps someone else can help you with that. I have a limit as to how far off the beaten path I am willing to go.I am suggesting that you actually focus on the question that I asked.
Really?Still you atheists will always be searching for truth always be searching for answers until you find what you are searching so longingly in your heart. God.
Really?
You think they are searching for the truth?
They sure have a funny way of looking for it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?