• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Someone Who Understands or Not?

If you could have only one of these in a significant other, which would it be?

  • I'm a man. I would prefer a woman who understands me.

  • I'm a man. I would prefer a woman who is very feminine.

  • I'm a woman. I would prefer a man who understands me.

  • I'm a woman. I would perfer a man who is very masculine.


Results are only viewable after voting.

fishstix

Senior Veteran
Jan 18, 2004
3,482
192
✟27,129.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Let's say that you had to choose between a significant other who really truly understood you or one who is an extreme example of their own gender. For this question, assume that the two are mutually exclusive. You can have one or the other but not both.

In other words, guys - you could have a woman who totally understands you and isn't very feminine or a woman who is extremely feminine but doesn't understand a thing that you do/think/say; girls - you could have a man who totally understands you but isn't very masculine or a man who is extremely masculine but has no understanding whatsoever about things that you do/think/say. Which would you choose?
 

Katty

Simply amazing.
Sep 10, 2003
1,391
57
40
Minnesota
Visit site
✟24,332.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
I don't think that it has so much to do with having a guy who totally understands me because sometimes when I rant and have to speak my mind, I'm not looking for understanding... just a willing ear to listen to what I have to say. Its nice to have someone who is an inbetween though, teehee. Your options don't leave much to desire at all :D hehehehe, I agree with the girls up there.... maybe it'll be good to stay single :D

~Katty~
 
Upvote 0

white dove

(she's a) maniac
Jan 23, 2004
24,118
2,234
Out there, livin'
✟56,857.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Private
I voted: I'm in the air about being single for the rest of my life or not.
I'm not sure if God's called me to be this way (as I've had this mindset for awhile) or whether He wants me to be with a man (I'm a little to ...hm.."expressive" with my feelings and it says in the Bible to get married if this is the case, and lately, it's been the case :) But, to answer the question, I prefer a (real) man who is understanding of me (my feelings -sympathetic, my emotions -perhaps someone laid back enough to let me go off on him..ha ha and who can spiritually connect with me, somone who doesn't see me as just a woman but as a Christian woman, a man I can pray with, etc. If a man is simply masculine, that doesn't mean he'll be a Christian, one who is walking with Christ, living for God. Masculinity in this case, is meaningless, "a chasing into the wind." Why, fishstix, you immasculine? ;) I'd recently thought about this one friend of mine, he's perfect in almost every single way: we relate on so much except the fact that he is not Christian and ultimatly, I feel, sees my being a Christian as one of my "flaws." We cannot ever, will never, connect spiritually and our relationship would be kinda condemned from the get-go, so I let whatever attraction I have to him (oh yeah AND he's not masculine, either :) ) fall to the wayside. There's a God-fearing man out there for me, if God so wills it! P.S. girls can be kind of a softy to them "nerdy" lookin' guys!
 
Upvote 0

Lia

Be Thou My Vision
Jan 12, 2004
849
39
Greeley, CO
✟23,706.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Woah. This is a hard poll to vote and I don't know if I want someone who understands me better than a masculine man and vice versa. I would expect the man that God has in store for me have both qualities but not to the extremes on either sides.
So, yeah, I agree with the crowd by not voting and rather be a single for a while :)
 
Upvote 0

mbotz72

mbotz72
Dec 24, 2003
105
11
42
MN
✟290.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I would want a man who is understanding of me because I think communication and relationships work better when there is some sort of common ground and understanding of each other.
When I think of masculinity, I think of many different definitions of it depending on your location. I just got back from Mexico, and there masculinity is all about macho-ism, which is a lot different than an American/US. view. There masulinity is about cat calls, having multiple lovers, "move it baby", "are you looking for me", telling all the gringas 'benitas' , grabbing their butts. This is what masculinity is there, and that is not attractive to me. Maybe because the culture that I come from sees all this as disrespect.
 
Upvote 0

fishstix

Senior Veteran
Jan 18, 2004
3,482
192
✟27,129.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
CA-Conservatives
I know that this isn't too realistic for real-world conditions; but the reason I have these separated is I want to see which one people think is more important in a spouse. So if you can only have one and not both; you'd pick the one that is more important to you. (Or stubbornly refuse to vote as a lot of people are doing ;) )
 
Upvote 0
K

KeilCoppes

Guest
fishstix said:
Or stubbornly refuse to vote as a lot of people are doing ;) )
Or maybe not stubborn, but knowing myself. If you added a few softer options with some of each such as
A) understanding but not feminine to the extreme - tomboyish
B) understanding but very difficult to look at, and butch
C) feminine but dumb as a post

then I would pick A without reservation. However, some of us simply cannot live at the extremes as we're more whole-people types and look for people who have some of each quality.
 
Upvote 0