Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
We don't know enough details on the Flood.
Science does very poor with historical facts.
Any that are suggested are often disputed later.
OK. Millions MUST DIE so beneficial changes can occur. Is that better?
And yet there are species that do not die. So much for your conclusions ...
I've seen young mothers push their kids in strollers out into traffic. I have a theory about lawyer commercials using the word "ought" that ties in with that. That's pretty close to your example.
Any increase in information is a perpetual motion machine.
Nope. You're wrong. Some mutations add information to a genome; some subtract it. Creationists get by with this claim only by leaving the term "information" undefined, impossibly vague, or constantly shifting. By any reasonable definition, increases in information have been observed to evolve. We have observed the evolution of:Any increase in information is a perpetual motion machine. More out than in. Any instance of this working would result in "an explosion" of information. Cancer might count if you look at it weird. But it's pretty self defeating. Not too sharp.
When the rubber hits the road, cdesign proponentsists so often find themselves under the wheels.Nope. You're wrong. Some mutations add information to a genome; some subtract it. Creationists get by with this claim only by leaving the term "information" undefined, impossibly vague, or constantly shifting. By any reasonable definition, increases in information have been observed to evolve. We have observed the evolution of:
That's called "evidence". Those are called "sources". They back up the evidence and prevent you from just dismissing it.
- increased genetic variety in a population (Lenski 1995; Lenski et al. 1991)
- increased genetic material (Alves et al. 2001; Brown et al. 1998; Hughes and Friedman 2003; Lynch and Conery 2000; Ohta 2003)
- novel genetic material (Knox et al. 1996; Park et al. 1996)
- novel genetically-regulated abilities (Prijambada et al. 1995)
You're wrong.
What is a 'cdesign proponentsist'?When the rubber hits the road, cdesign proponentsists so often find themselves under the wheels.
Yup -- read it."Investigations subsequent to the case showed that, in one particular case, an editor had apparently copied and pasted "design proponents" over the word "creationists" but in doing so had pasted over only part of the latter, resulting in a weird neologism, "cdesign proponentsists".[1][2] This typo has been mocked by some as the missing link between creationism and intelligent design, notably ironic considering creationists don't accept transitional forms. It's possibly this aspect alone that has promoted the meme to be as famous as it is. "
This reinforces my assertion that Intelligent Design has done nothing but make creationism look bad.
Didn't your pastor teach you that Jesus will return to an earth inhabited by people?What he should probably know is all life on earth eventually will die. Humans won't be on earth quadrillions of years from now. The sun will have expanded to the size of a red giant, and will swallow everything in its path, including us.
Seeing that "design proponents" has 16 letters with a gap and the word "creationists" only has 12 letters with no gap, shouldn't the word "creationists" be entirely pasted over?"Investigations subsequent to the case showed that, in one particular case, an editor had apparently copied and pasted "design proponents" over the word "creationists" but in doing so had pasted over only part of the latter, resulting in a weird neologism, "cdesign proponentsists".
Didn't your pastor teach you that Jesus will return to an earth inhabited by people?
Or are you an imposter?
Seeing that "design proponents" has 16 letters with a gap and the word "creationists" only has 12 letters with no gap, shouldn't the word "creationists" be entirely pasted over?
5 letters from "creationists" being exposed is a bit of a stretch.
This seems more likely:
design proponents
ocreationists
dcreationistsnents
I'm guessing they hired someone like you to make the alterations.
More like it's a transitional spelling.Yup -- read it.
Well, for the record, I'm glad Intelligent Design got vegomaticked.
Now maybe we can get back to creationism and defend it correctly, eh?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?