Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No....my common sense says there is no reason to believe in that at all....
Explain why you think that way.....
I believe the bible, and the physical things that coincide with biblical truth such as the worldwide flood.
I have been in the bowels of the earth seen and touched with my own hands....dug in the dirt and uncovered these mysteries myself.
I have talked to miners that found tree limbs...chunks of wood intermixed in these suposed "ancient river deposits"....if they were millions of years old....why didn't they either rot away, or turn into petrified wood over that supposed millions of years? One guy told me that as he brought his gravels outside that a process would be triggered where these pieces of wood would rapidly decay when brought outside and exposed.
This wood is millions of years old, but would rapidly decay when exposed to sun and whatever the enviromental differences were from being buried inside a mountain to being brough outside?
Yeah...
But even of evolution WAS right, it does NOT contradict Genesis which only says that the Plant Kingdom came before the Animal Kingdom.
That is the same as science says too.
I do not know what you are talking about, and I would never base my own faith on just believing what someone told me during a brief conversation. My own belief and faith requires some solid basis to base my beliefs upon.
Sorry......everything I have studied or except to be suitable for my worldview does not accomodate what you are suggesting.
No, it isn't.
The biological understanding is that animals came frst.
Where are Hespera and Orogeny? Or Split Rock?
Orogeny is good about stuff like this....
You are as quick to be involved in both for some reason too.
One is pro and one is con...you are in both are you not....your are in most all debates that are evolution versus creationism espousing your beliefs very strongly.....I am in 2 right now.
And your belief of "quiet water" is based upon what "absolute truth" ? See in your view everyhting that is held to be true by science is some sort of absolute. But science changes and even contradicts it's own beliefs as new things are found and examined. If a serious flaw in a dating system was proven it would knock down your theory (idea) of evolution.
All you've described in your massive block of text is a conglomerate with plant fragments in it. There is nothing special or unique about that. Post some pictures of your 'anomalies', give us a measured section, a sketch, anything useful. A block of rambling text using unscientific language is not.You failed to try to explain that mix of anolomlies within a few feet of rock....
If you are satisfied that you answered my challenge that is all that matters....
Everybody that reads this can decide if you did properly address or refute my claim(s) or not for themselves.
And failed to provide any reason to believe anything you mentioned was do to a global flood.You failed to try to explain that mix of anolomlies within a few feet of rock....
Yes.If you are satisfied that you answered my challenge that is all that matters....
Everyone can also read and deside if what you described had to be due to a global flood.Everybody that reads this can decide if you did properly address or refute my claim(s) or not for themselves.
Sure thing:Show us all then how The Flood produced miles of chalk, as we see in England.
Show us all then how The Flood produced miles of chalk, as we see in England. Or how it can deposit shale... show us all up and those dumb geologists. Your years of mining experience and looking at old mining records must make you an expert, afterall.
What has your mama's vehicle to do with the question?Sure thing:
Yes. Now back up the assertion with facts.I claimed tree bark stuck visibly inside a deposit of hardrock that contained angular fragments buried deep inside a mountain top high in the Sierras could have been the result of a worldwide flood.
No, first you claimed it was supposed to be billions of years old, now you are claiming it is supposed to be millions of years old. The fact is you have no idea either how old the rocks are, or how old a geologist would tell us they are.I further queried how old was it? Could it have survived intact for millions of years?
Yes, and can you explain how it is still intact after thousands of years?I further stated I thought the age of that bark to be thousands of years.
I do, do you? Where is your "reasoning?" It seems to go like this: Here is something I don't understand with my "common sense." I bet dumb evolutionist/ geologists can't explain it, therefore The Flood did it.I do not have to prove anything....I just posed the question....seeking some alternative explainations to refute my belief that it was the result of a flood deposit. It is not beyond reason that it WAS the result of a flood.....do you understand what reasoning is?
I only accept one reality. I don't have my own.Iam trying to explain my reasoning....you do not have to accept it as your own reality
What makes you think I have the smallest interest in "Slaying" your pitiful beliefs? You creationists think the whole universe revolves around you and your egos, don't you?I give you this chance Split Rock to SLAY MY BELIEFS with your knowledge and science....CAN YOU?
Admit what??If you can't be big enough to admit to it?
When did I attack your character?Not attack my character or my approach
What's a "neener neener" game??It seems we always get into the "neener neener" game for some strange reason?
One more time... I couldn't care less about your oh so precious beliefs. Get over yourself.I would like to stay focused on the challenge I presented, or if you prefer....the opportunity to discredit my beliefs....call it what you like....CAN YOU DO IT?
Pride is a SIN.GO AHEAD MAN DISECT ME with your knowledge
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?