Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You're very late to the party, that comnent wasn't directed to you and your request has nothing to do with my post. Are you just looking for an argument?
since there is no known natural process that can produce gears- this isnt the same as waterfalls.
I love it. When it suits you, you are happy to claim one process is not the same as another different process. Yet most of your argumentation relies on equivocation and claiming that different process are the same.since there is no known natural process that can produce gears- this isnt the same as waterfalls.
i dont know and its irrelevant. we can only know that it was the result of design.
so you can say the same about unknown watch. since you can know how it was designed (its possible that someone made it by a new unuqie process) you cant conclude design?
We're not talking about watches. We're talking about biological gears in Issus coleoptratus.
How were they designed? Show us a plausible mechanism.
Besides, we can have pre-existing knowledge that humans design and build watches. We don't have the same knowledge about Issus coleoptratus.
yes we do. we know that gears are made by intelligent.
so again your objection isnt realistic. we dont need to know how gears are made in order to know that they were designed.
Do you really not see what a dumb argument that is, or are you so anxious to shove your religion up our noses that you don't care? "Gears are designed so they are either made by humans or they are made by some other intelligent agency using a magical process which I don't have to describe to you but which you must believe in anyway."yes we do. we know that gears are made by intelligent. so again your objection isnt realistic. we dont need to know how gears are made in order to know that they were designed.
Do you really not see what a dumb argument that is, or are you so anxious to shove your religion up our noses that you don't care? "Gears are designed so they are either made by humans or they are made by some other intelligent agency using a magical process which I don't have to describe to you but which you must believe in anyway."
So how do we know how that they were designed? All I have heard from you (for years) is a claim that some things "were obviously designed", or "could not have occurred naturally". Did I miss something more substantial from you?. we dont need to know how gears are made in order to know that they were designed.
Evolution has produced an approximation in the partial gearing that synchronizes the back legs of certain planthoppers. One could also argue that it had produced functional approximations of gears at the nanoscale; but you're right, they're clearly not like human-designed gears - no indication of design, despite their functional similarity.since there is no known natural process that can produce gears...
Evolution has produced an approximation in the partial gearing that synchronizes the back legs of certain planthoppers. One could also argue that it had produced functional approximations of gears at the nanoscale; but you're right, they're clearly not like human-designed gears - no indication of design, despite their functional similarity.
How do we know gears "are made by intelligent"? Please show us the evidence we use, then show us the exact same evidence in your insect's gears.yes we do. we know that gears are made by intelligent. so again your objection isnt realistic. we dont need to know how gears are made in order to know that they were designed.
No the assertion is that in some cases we cannot determine whether the gear-like structures were the product of design or not. Intelligent design is an unfalsifiable proposition. It can never be ruled out, but its presence cannot always be demonstrated.so according to you some gears arent the result of design. ok. but who has the burdon of proof in that case?
so according to you some gears arent the result of design. ok. but who has the burdon of proof in that case?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?