And still... evolutionists on this topic vehemently ignore the facts I presented in
the article, and they do their usual trolling. The facts are as follows:
A) The enormous discrepancy between the universe’s resources and the possible number of structures that won’t fit interdependent structures
B) Nature lacks causality for linking distinctly located or functionality interdependent structures together
It is worth to note here that these two facts have nothing to do with the theory of evolution(ToE)
per se. In other words, one can use these facts to disprove the ToE even if he/she never heard of it. This is because the ToE assumes
ipso facto the sufficiency of the resources, and the existence of the linking causality. In that sense, nobody cares how evolutionary theory accounts for the origin of sex or whatever. It's all just merely a product of imagination. It's just a bunch of stories that attempt to reconstruct unseen past events. What is important is that the ToE assumes something that denies physical realities.
The ToE believers are modern-day flat-earthers who deny reality because it fits their world view. The discussion with them is pointless. When confronted with facts they can only respond with their usual labeling and name-calling: " an entirely bogus description of the evolution", "the grotesque mischaracterization of the evolution", "grossly overgeneralize", "a straw man argument","it's the same error you made in the OP","it's argument from incredulity ", "if you were to spend time studying papers", "your misunderstanding", "you are a layperson", "you have no actual scientific knowledge or background", "you need to learn a lot more about evolution", "you"..."you"... "you"...
So like I have already said, they can't actually discuss something. They just label the opposing points of view and resort to name-calling.