- Nov 21, 2008
- 53,499
- 11,987
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
Paul says there is nothing at all wrong with it in Romans 7.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So your against murder? Who isn't? " Thou shalt not murder." What is wrong with the law of God? Who knows?
Paul says there is nothing at all wrong with it in Romans 7.
Good stuff!Word can be used as a way to get an advantage of others. Accusing that's we're saying it's OK to murder is satan's a plot to confuse the facts.
Roman 2 and 3 teaches about how God will judge the world.
It explains that that will judge both those with and without the law by sin not by law.
12 For as many as have sinned without law will also perish without law, and as many as have sinned in the law will be judged by the law
Those who feel that law is God's standard of judgment fail to understand the doctrine of God's Judgment as established in Roman 2&3.
If any man breaks the law, by the standard of the law, he should die, because there is no gray area in the law.
Forgiveness of sins is God's plan to save the world. If you're pursuing righteousness by trying to keep the law, that's you. But when you judge others by the law, you subject yourself to condemnation by the law. (Rom 2:1-5)
Within this context, we learn that all men have sinned and fall short of God glory. (Rom 3:23)
We learn that the law only give us knowledge of sin (Rom 3:20)
What this mean is the law is only a listing of things not to break. It's similar to a boxing announcer saying: "and Fraizer throws a punch to the neck." His voice only bring attention to the action. Without or before the voice of the law, sin was always an option.
Paul teaches that sin was in the world before the law. Some rather take John out of context and claim the premise that sin is transgression of the law.
Paul reveals that if God everlasting promise to Abraham had a condition of keeping the law, then Jesus died in vain.
These scriptures below reinforce some facts above..........
Gal 3:17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
Gal 3:18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
Gal 3:19 ¶ Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
Gal 3:20 Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.
Gal 3:21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Gal 3:22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
Keep in mind the scripture does not conclude that we're all under law. It say we're all under for sin..........
God bless.
other than sin used the command, the command aroused sin the...oh nevermind, judt read my siggy.
but did you read the clear facts of my siggy?"Where there is no law - there is no sin" Romans 4.
"Sin IS transgression of the Law" 1John 3:4.
The LAW condemns all the world and defines sin - Romans 3:19-22
"Do we then make void the LAW by our faith? God forbid!! in fact we ESTABLISH the LAW" Rom 3:31
"what matters is KEEPING the Commandments of God" 1Cor 7:19
The saints are know as those who "KEEP the Commandments of God AND their faith in Jesus" Rev 14:12
in Christ,
Bob
Word can be used as a way to get an advantage of others. Accusing that's we're saying it's OK to murder is satan's a plot to confuse the facts.
Roman 2 and 3 teaches about how God will judge the world.
It explains that that will judge both those with and without the law by sin not by law.
12 For as many as have sinned without law will also perish without law, and as many as have sinned in the law will be judged by the law
Those who feel that law is God's standard of judgment fail to understand the doctrine of God's Judgment as established in Roman 2&3.
If any man breaks the law, by the standard of the law, he should die, because there is no gray area in the law.
Forgiveness of sins is God's plan to save the world. If you're pursuing righteousness by trying to keep the law, that's you. But when you judge others by the law, you subject yourself to condemnation by the law. (Rom 2:1-5)
Within this context, we learn that all men have sinned and fall short of God glory. (Rom 3:23)
We learn that the law only give us knowledge of sin (Rom 3:20)
What this mean is the law is only a listing of things not to break. It's similar to a boxing announcer saying: "and Fraizer throws a punch to the neck." His voice only bring attention to the action. Without or before the voice of the law, sin was always an option.
Paul teaches that sin was in the world before the law. Some rather take John out of context and claim the premise that sin is transgression of the law.
Paul reveals that if God everlasting promise to Abraham had a condition of keeping the law, then Jesus died in vain.
These scriptures below reinforce some facts above..........
Gal 3:17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
Gal 3:18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
Gal 3:19 ¶ Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
Gal 3:20 Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.
Gal 3:21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Gal 3:22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
Keep in mind the scripture does not conclude that we're all under law. It say we're all under for sin..........
God bless.
I'm not able to understand this emphasis for the law. I can pretty much remember when I became a Christian, but I cannot remember when I became an old testament Jew. Scripture says even Jesus broke the Sabbath, so what's the big deal? When Moses came off the mountain my ancestors weren't there promising to obey anything. They were off in northern Europe worshipping trees or rocks. I have no historic connection to Moses and his law.
I'm not able to understand this emphasis for the law. I can pretty much remember when I became a Christian, but I cannot remember when I became an old testament Jew. Scripture says even Jesus broke the Sabbath, so what's the big deal? When Moses came off the mountain my ancestors weren't there promising to obey anything. They were off in northern Europe worshipping trees or rocks. I have no historic connection to Moses and his law.
Gerhard Ebersöhn;67191319 said:Re: <<<"Where there is no law - there is no sin" Romans 4.>>>
Were there no Jesus Christ there would have been no sin. Do I now make Jesus Christ, sin? God forbid! On the contrary, I establish Jesus Christ.
This makes sense to you?
Gerhard Ebersöhn;67191319 said:Re: <<<"Where there is no law - there is no sin" Romans 4.>>>
Were there no Jesus Christ there would have been no sin. Do I now make Jesus Christ, sin? God forbid! On the contrary, I establish Jesus Christ.
Cribstyl said:Paul reveals that if God everlasting promise to Abraham had a condition of keeping the law, then Jesus died in vain.
These scriptures below reinforce some facts above..........
Gal 3:17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
Gal 3:18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
Gal 3:19 ¶ Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
Gal 3:20 Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.
Gal 3:21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Gal 3:22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
Keep in mind the scripture does not conclude that we're all under law. It say we're all under for sin..........
In other words Bob, after we settle this point, about the rom 3 mistake, I will go point by point, not post by post, because aome posts may have several points in them, or verses out of context, so for clarity, I will go point by point, one point one at a time, that's even better for us both, then we can resolve all issues.
This will make for a more friendly cohesive chat.
Bob, before we go further, what about how you said in post 88, that it was the 10 commandments in Rom 3, while you quoted 3:19, which is clearly not about the 10? Again, this is contradictory, after you settle this mistake, I will proceed on your new posts.
Please see my next post, before answering, thanks!
law in Rom 4:15 was the code, because it speaks of transgression, the violation of a written known law. So that law is gone, the code id over, it is 2015!
Romans 3 does not say "the world used to be condemned" by the Ten commandments - but rather - still is.
There is nothing wrong with the law of God. There is nothing wrong with the Ten Commandments. It is just because we have a New Covenant that does not include them as an obligation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?