Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Its "visible to those familiar with it" only because those people have been indoctrinated into that world view. It should be based on logic and reality, things anyone can relate to.Science's process is visible to those familiar with it.
Lies are deliberately opaque.
What evidence was against it exactly? Could you elaborate. What were their findings?
Its "visible to those familiar with it" only because those people have been indoctrinated into that world view. It should be based on logic and reality, things anyone can relate to.
OIC. In as much as creation can be tested, scientists looked for evidence of creation but didn't find any. But they found evidence that didn't match creation, so creation was falsified and other hyotheses were made to explain the unexpected observations.What I mean is creation is a viewpoint that has been around for thousands of years (from the beginning of human history), why doesn't science simply test this to begin with, why search for an alternative explanation without first testing this. Seems to me that the scientists are happy with any alternative to creation.
Comparing news & media with other fields of activity as far as lies are concerned is logically incoherent - news and media are where lies from all fields of activity, including science, are made public.Also it is clear that many lies are spread through the news, media etc. What makes you think that the scientific community is any different?
It is based on logic and observation. Explanations are tested by checking their predictions and implications - if the explanation is correct, we should expect to see X and we should not expect to see Y. If we see Y the explanation is false. If we see X the explanation is supported.Its "visible to those familiar with it" only because those people have been indoctrinated into that world view. It should be based on logic and reality, things anyone can relate to.
They can be trusted when they are logical, speak with common sense, when they speak of things that I can clearly see in reality; not this scientist said this so trust it thing. Logic and reality should be our basis, not what some scientists said.
Well from where you are reasoning from- where only the natural toward body benefit is priority numero uno it doesn't... but for us who have placed faith in God and His Word it is eternal pricelessness!
Please elaborate what thought process was erroneous?
by your categorization of self Agnostic...
Yes and The Word 'IS' God!And is a single word on an internet message board really all it takes to achieve understanding of another person, even to the point where you see no need to even ask them a question?
Yes and The Word 'IS' God!
Agnostic believes you cannot know God thus making His Word to us false... your position denies the purpose God has set forth in His Word"Agnostic" is God?
I suspect you were more interested in making a funny than a point, but I'm going to ask for some clarification anyway...
Agnostic believes you cannot know God thus making His Word to us false... your position denies the purpose God has set forth in His Word
John 15:15 (KJV)
[15] Henceforth I call you not servants; for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth: but I have called you friends; for all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you.
Jesus has called us all friendSounds like you don't consider yourself God's "servant," but rather His "friend."
How can that which began be equal to Him Who has no beginning?...perhaps even an equal?
Agnostic believes you cannot know God thus making His Word to us false... your position denies the purpose God has set forth in His Word
Interesting is that we don't seem to see as many Geocentrists around here as we used to.FYI, that's the "hard" agnostic. Hard agnostics believe that we can't know whether God exists or not. The vast majority of agnostics are "soft" agnostics. They don't have a belief regarding the existence of God. They're simply unsure of whether God exists or not.
I've had a harder time finding hard agnostics than finding geocentrists.
Jesus has called us all friend
What does it mean that Jesus is a friend of sinners? | GotQuestions.org
How can that which began be equal to Him Who has no beginning?
I think these days if they are that far into a super-literalist, conspiracy mindset they go all the way to Flat Earth.
That is why the cross was necessary for The Son to pass through... He, Jesus, literally gave up all of Himself yet love still remainedOnly problem is that Jesus wasn't nearly as "helpless" as human beings tend to be.
soft or hard they have His Word and it testifies of The Who of God... do you think God will be tolerant for those who do not bother to look there?FYI, that's the "hard" agnostic. Hard agnostics believe that we can't know whether God exists or not. The vast majority of agnostics are "soft" agnostics. They don't have a belief regarding the existence of God. They're simply unsure of whether God exists or not.
I've had a harder time finding hard agnostics than finding geocentrists.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?