• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Solution to the creation/evolution debate...?

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,143
✟349,282.00
Faith
Atheist
what evidence can you put forth of an eternal existence of this universe?
None. What evidence can you put forth of an eternal creator?

The way I see it, the universe indisputably exists and has existed for a very long time. We don't yet have the physics to extrapolate back beyond a certain time, but there are a number of ideas for how it could be either eternal or temporally finite but unbounded, that are not inconsistent with the physics we do have.

OTOH, we have thousands of origin myths & legends, and thousands of descriptions of gods, some of which are creator gods, many of which are contradictory (i.e. cannot easily be explained as different interpretations of the same thing), and all of which have the hallmarks of human imagination and story-telling. The claims made about them are unsubstantiated or untestable and we have no evidence that any of them exist.

So both science and origin myths & deities attempt to provide satisfying explanations for the unexplained history or origin of our universe.

Science has a proven track record of describing and explaining the universe, so I'm prepared to wait and see whether we can discover any more about the history and/or origin of our universe.

The explanatory power of origin myths and deities appears limited to their influence on human behaviour, so I see no reason to give significant credence to any of them, whether they happen to be currently popular or not.
 
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

enoob57

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2022
585
148
68
Grove, Ok.
✟64,657.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Divorced
Learning some physics beats
guessing. Same with how atheists think.
Part of it is the humble acceptance of mysteries
that may never be solved.
Yes I enjoy learning things... it is quite pleasuable! Atheists are biased by there own thought and identifying of themselves.

These mysteries you speak of are (for me) indicators of the intensity of what is truly here... and the more we know the more is generated to be known. The existence of what we have began in humbles all to say the least...

Your question also applies to any "god".
Where did it come from, how did it get so smart.
of all gods generated in the minds of men: all seem to carry our qualities and highest goals are just more the same we have began in... greek gods were of this, Allah the highest of thought is virgins, atheist returning to nothingness, etc. However The God of The Bible is unique to itself and no other! Heaven according to God is not comparable to any of this we have began in...

Genesis describes how earth was formed, in
poetic language. There's nothing in the account that matches or is not directly contradicted any actual data.
If you began in a place where lies have been so cleverly constructed you could not recognize them as lies ... how would you expect to find the truth?
 
Upvote 0

FrumiousBandersnatch

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2009
15,405
8,143
✟349,282.00
Faith
Atheist
If you began in a place where lies have been so cleverly constructed you could not recognize them as lies ... how would you expect to find the truth?
Good question - and the lies stories don't have to be particularly cleverly constructed, as long as they appeal to human psychology - such as: belonging to a special group, having certainty, a clear moral framework, powerful & benign authority figure(s), magic & mystery, the promise of future rewards, feeling loved and cherished by a transcendent entity, the promise of eternal life, etc.

People that grow up in such environments, or get sucked into them, tend to believe that they have the truth.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

On August Recess
Mar 11, 2017
21,803
16,437
55
USA
✟413,592.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Since you think the compatibility of science and your version of GEnesis are contained in this post, I will address it scientifically. (And the rest of this thread has degenerated.)


First of all it should go without saying that none of these things happened in a day. Even if you want to use some poetic-language interpretation, "day" is a really bad word for these vague epochs.

Through the formation of the Earth, this is an acceptable description of the scientific record of the origin of the Earth. Then things go a bit awry...

There is no "separating of dimensions". Period. "Dimensions" are geometric coordinates they are not alternative realities or places. (Sorry all of that "dimensions" stuff in Sci Fi is wrong.)


This starts off completely wrong. "Dry land" did not emerge from an ocean. That is backwards. The surface of the Earth started out hot (from bombardment) and eventually water condensed from the atmosphere to form bodies of liquid. That water came either from volcanic outgassing or comets.


I don't know the history of primitive Earth's cloud cover, but the dominance of the algae transformed the atmosphere to one like today: Nitrogen-oxygen with some cloud cover. Long before "complex plant life" there would have been gaps in the clouds. (The "revealing" of the celestial bodies is a very Earth-surface centered view too.)


The first complex animal life and plant life emerge roughly at the same time from single celled eukaryotes. The first land animals were insects, etc., evolved from similar sea creatures with hard shells.


This is a reasonable simplification of the development of quadrapedal animals on land with the unneeded religious bits added.


And now it's just pure religion. There is no non-religious reason to think any of this will happen.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,751
52,542
Guam
✟5,134,210.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No, they are two different questions:

1. How old is the universe we are living in now?
2. Was it created ex nihilo or ex materia?
1. The universe is as old as God willed it to be. I'll address any age. If you think it's only 6000 years, that's fine. If you think it's 60 trillion years, that's fine. But what I won't accept, is the fact that the universe has been in existence going back beyond 4004 BC.

2. Both. But mainly ex nihilo. The events of the Creation Week were a series of miracles that raised the amount of mass/energy in the universe from zero to what it is today.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,751
52,542
Guam
✟5,134,210.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
In case anyone's interested, here's a creationism test that I made up, based on what I would teach if I taught Creationism:

1. Explain the difference between creatio ex nihilo and creatio ex materia; and give two examples of each.
2. Explain the difference between "God" and "LORD God".
3. Eden in the Bible is known as __________ on a secular map.
4. What literary device reconciles Genesis 1 and Genesis 2?
5. Put the following in order that they appeared in the universe: whales, stars, trees, sun, land, sea, outer space.
6. What day was Adam created on?
7. Was the universe created a closed system and, if not, what kind of energy did it run off of? if it was created open, what closed it?
8. Describe terra aqua and what kind of water it consisted of and why.
9. Photosynthesis required light from the sun prior to the Fall. true or false?
10. Explain how a 24-hour day could transpire before the sun was created.
11. Explain the difference between "miracles" and "magic."
12. When discussing Creationism, why should one never let himself stray from Genesis 1 or 2?
13. Why is "heaven" singular in Genesis 1, but plural in Genesis 2?
 
Upvote 0

ottawak

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2021
1,495
725
65
North Carolina
✟16,862.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Episcopalian
Marital Status
Married
It's still zero.

What's the Total Energy In the Universe?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,751
52,542
Guam
✟5,134,210.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
QV please:
From what I understand of the standard model of cosmology, it is still at zero. How does that work?
It is at net zero ... there's the difference.
Wow!! AV has actually learned something!

And this man will explain how the universe has an energy of zero:

Krauss '09: "A Universe From Nothing" - YouTube
 
Upvote 0

enoob57

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2022
585
148
68
Grove, Ok.
✟64,657.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Divorced
I find it quite telling how atheist attack the Bible but not the easter bunny...
 
Upvote 0

ottawak

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2021
1,495
725
65
North Carolina
✟16,862.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Episcopalian
Marital Status
Married
I find it quite telling how atheist attack the Bible but not the easter bunny...
I don't really see how it's an attack on the Bible; perhaps you could be more specific.
 
Upvote 0