• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Six Day Creation? No Way!

Revealing Times

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2016
2,845
420
61
Clanton Alabama
✟123,106.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
You do know just quoting scriptures is not a discussion. Its like me reading the bible, I have read the bible many times so when you only quote scriptures, I just skip it. I have bible study every week.
 
Reactions: Sapiens
Upvote 0

Oseas

Well-Known Member
Jun 23, 2017
2,409
203
88
Joinville
✟132,526.00
Country
Brazil
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

You wrote: >>>Since God is infinite and the age of his creation is only 6000 years, then the time passed would appear to only be a fraction of a second to Him. <<<

I think that we are not able to make a calculation of the fraction of a second to God, having as a parameter Eternity to Eternity, but as a man, if we do a parameter taking 2Peter chapter 3:v.8 or Psalms 90:4 of Moses, where is written that One Day with the Lord is as a thousand years (a millennium) in our Christian Calendar;

Then One hour with the Lord is as 41,666...years in our Christian Calendar or 42 yrs by rounding calculation, and if we equate it, we will conclude, by approximation, that One second corresponds to 7 DAYS in our Christian Calendar. By the way, the 6.000 years from Adam until the end of the last millennium (year 2.000) in accord our Christian Calendar, they correspond to a 2.190.000 days.
(Note: I am not expert in mathematic).

You wrote: >>>When in the creation narrative did God make man in his likeness? This occurred in Genesis 1:26. Closer inspection should be made in Genesis 1. Notice on many occasions throughout Genesis 1 he used the language to declare the things of this creation being "after his kind".<<<

This revelation which God gave to Moses 2.500 years after the first Adam or two and half days of the week of God, it is very very deep. Let us analize it.
As we know, "the first man, Adam, was made a living soul; the first man is of the earth, he is earthly".
And God said: Gen. 1:26 - Let us make man in our image, after our (plural) likeness
I have study very hard this work of creation of man that our God made, together with other, let us say, as a “helpers”.

To interpret this great mystery, the gifts given through the Spirit, the gift of wisdom and gift of science, they are them which can help us to enter in the field of revelation for to understand the God's plan in the creation of man in His likeness. To understand this mistery, it is good to say this work of God is so far of the field of speculations, many people tend to invent theories more than revelations. I think this is very dangerous.

Let us analize the biblical verse:

Could our God Father say: I will make a man in my image, after my likeness? No, no. Why not? Let us see: God is an invisible being. God is Spirit. What is His image? What is His likeness? How would be the image of a man in this case? Again, Let us see: God is the Word, the Word is God. By the context of creation, What would be the image of the Word? What would be His likeness in this primary context of creation? It would be, let us say, impossible to make a man of the invisible God only.

Notice that the previous plan of GOD was to create man in the sixth day of the week, by the way, on the eve of His day of rest, the seventh Day, certainly He would had a hard work to make it and it would be the last work to do, right?

What would GOD need to do in that first moment, for to make a man in the sixth Day in His image and likeness? God would need to make first a likeness of Himself, a likeness of the Invisible God. Here is the GREAT MYSTERY for us to interpret it together. Without His likeness was impossible to create man in His image. Who would be His likeness? JESUS, yes, JESUS is the likeness of God Almighty, of course. Only JESUS, yes. (John 14:8-9) 8- Philip saith unto JESUS, Lord, show us the Father, and it sufficeth us. 9 Jesus saith unto Philip: Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?

Here is the MYSTERY. To create man GOD would need, in first place, to make TWO great works: to make be born the person of JESUS and also to make be born the person of the Comfort, the Spirit of Truth, the Holy Spirit, each One in a pre-dertermined Day of the week. First JESUS and after, the person of the Comfort, the Spirit of Truth, the Holy Spirit.

And when or in which Days of the week these works would happen? In accord GOD's plan, JESUS would be born in the fourth Day of the week (Gen. 1:v.16 and Col.1:15-20) 15 Who is the image of the invisible God (John 14:v.8-11), the firstborn of every creature: 16 For by Him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by Him, and for Him: 17 And He is before all things, and by Him all things consist.

For better understanding, it is important to know that JESUS was born around 2,000 years ago, ie. 4,000 years after the first Adam, the earthly Adam of he beginning of creation. As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly. And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly. How will be man in the kingdom of God? (Luke 20:35-36 has the answer)

There are three that bear record in heaven (heaven is not the physical space of the Universe, but celestial places in Christ JESUS (Eph.1:v.3), the Father (God Father-God is an invisible Spirit), the Word,(JESUS, the Word made flesh) and the Holy Spirit (who is not a ghost, much less a holy ghost, as is written in the Bible of English language, he is a person as JESUS also is, he has a name that no man knows, but he himself(Rev.19:v.12) he is the Comfort, the Paraclete) : and these three are One, three distincts persons and they work as whether were only One.

Now unto the King Eternal, Immortal, Invisible, the only wise God, be Honour and Glory for ever and ever. Amen. Yes, to the only wise God our Saviour, through JESUS Christ, be Glory and Majesty, Dominion and Power, both now and ever. Amen. .
 
Upvote 0

Oseas

Well-Known Member
Jun 23, 2017
2,409
203
88
Joinville
✟132,526.00
Country
Brazil
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You do know just quoting scriptures is not a discussion. Its like me reading the bible, I have read the bible many times so when you only quote scriptures, I just skip it. I have bible study every week.

O you are discussing about God's creation and you just skip Scriptures. In truth you are not lying. When you say that God is the beginning and the End you are skipping Scriptures. Scriptures say, and I confirm the Word of God, that JESUS is the beginning and the ending, the first and the last, the Alpha and Omega. The Most High and Almighty God has not beginning, neither ending, He is from Eternity to Eternity

You said "We can't look at creation through our perspective, Creation is told via God's perspective".
How could you understand Creation via God's perspective if you ignore Scriptures, the book of the LOrd, as you said?
As I said, Heaven is not the physical space of the Universe (sky), but celestial places in Christ JESUS (Eph.1:v.3). There are several heavens, the 1st, 2nd, 3rd heaven, and the heaven of heavens. By the way, the Apostle Paul knew a man in Christ which was caught up to the third heaven. The Most High and Almighty God is in the heaven of the heavens, and the question is, I repeat: Where do you think is the heaven of the heavens, if the Most High and Almighty "God is sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain,(the 1st,2nd,3rd), and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in"? Isaiah 40:v.21to23

Well, what man knows the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knows no man, but the Spirit of God. Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teaches, but which the Holy Spirit teaches comparing spiritual things with spiritual.

But the natural man receives not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
 
Upvote 0

Revealing Times

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2016
2,845
420
61
Clanton Alabama
✟123,106.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married

I don't need to see someone "Quoting Scriptures" without making an intelligent argument for himself. I am a Preacher, I know the scriptures brother. That's the point. Pasting a bunch of scriptures without making a point means very little.

I know others like this, they are Post tribbers (which is dead wrong) and they think by posting scriptures it makes their point, which it doesn't because they seemingly do not understand that which they post. POINT BEING: Just because someone posts a scripture, doesn't mean that scripture agrees with their point of view.

IMMEDIATELY AFTER the Tribulation the Church returns with Jesus (See Rev. 19), but they think by posting that scripture it creates a point that can't be defeated.

Make an argument brother, you will learn much more from back and forths when you make an actual argument on a subject.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: jhwatts
Upvote 0

jhwatts

Junior Member
Site Supporter
Mar 25, 2014
371
66
50
Ohio
✟163,016.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

God is not invisible but we simply cannot look upon Him with our earthly form.

Exodus 33: (18-23) 18 And he said, I beseech thee, shew me thy glory. 19 And he said, I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the Lord before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy. 20 And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live. 21 And the Lord said, Behold, there is a place by me, and thou shalt stand upon a rock: 22 And it shall come to pass, while my glory passeth by, that I will put thee in a clift of the rock, and will cover thee with my hand while I pass by: 23 And I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall not be seen.

Moses looked at the back of God and so he must be visible.

Notice that the previous plan of GOD was to create man in the sixth day of the week, by the way, on the eve of His day of rest, the seventh Day, certainly He would had a hard work to make it and it would be the last work to do, right?

What you are calling the previous plan is the post.


You do know the mind of God and therefore what you are proposing is a pure assumption.


Again, speculation. You are simply assuming God needs to two great works.



Jesus existed before the world was and not created on the fourth day. Proverbs 8: (22-32)


The Trinity.

Your theology is fragmented and full of speculation and has very little Bible support. You show no real coherent connection between the scriptures you point out.
 
Upvote 0

Sapiens

Wisdom is of God
Aug 29, 2015
494
202
Canada
Visit site
✟26,119.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

Hello again!

Thank you for your well-written response.

I am unfortunately left unconvinced. Perhaps you will tell me it is because of my ignorance in the field, but I hardly see how seeing some particles of light or whatever in the present can tell you how old the universe is... Much less how it was formed in the course of time. If you yourself possess the understanding, then I would appreciate you vulgarizing it for me. (Or if you know of a good website that explains it)

I also watched the video. The man seems to be a nice person. However, I fail to see the relevance of his argument. The laws of nature could not have preceded the universe, and, even if they did, it would be pure speculation to posit that they have. All we need to know is that the universe began to exist, that it cannot create itself and that it has a cause of its existence outside of itself which is itself uncreated and eternal. That is of course God. In any case, the laws of nature were themselves created by God for this universe, so...
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Revealing Times

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2016
2,845
420
61
Clanton Alabama
✟123,106.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married

The video was not fully perceived by you then. Here was his argument, and either you cut it a bit short or didn't grasp it.

Laws of Nature/Set of Forces called Quantum Fluctuations

1. Not Physical
2. Acts on the Physical
3. Created the Physical from Nothing
4. Predates the Universe

This ABOVE is the very definition of the Biblical God.

So this Quantum Fluctuations as Science calls it, is the Laws of Nature or a Set of Forces or.................. GOD !!

He's telling you that Scientists have Discovered God and DON'T REALIZE IT.

1. God is a Spirit (Not Physical)
2. God Created the Universe (Physical Worlds)
3. God Created the Universe from Nothing (He spoke it into existence)
4. God PREDATES the Universe (That's what the Bible says, God is Eternal).

Pictures don't lie, we can see babies in wombs the same way and planes on Radar, so that is on you brother. The light is reaching our earth from Millions of miles away. Meaning we can not be a young earth. Its just not really even debatable.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Oseas

Well-Known Member
Jun 23, 2017
2,409
203
88
Joinville
✟132,526.00
Country
Brazil
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

You wrote: >>>I don't need to see someone "Quoting Scriptures" without making an intelligent argument for himself. I am a Preacher, I know the scriptures brother. That's the point. <<<

O you make an intelligent argument for yourself, you are a preacher and you, brother, know Scriptures and that's the point, right? Then you should know what the Lord will destroy the wisdom of the wise; the intelligence of the intelligent He will frustrate. So, where is the wise person? Where is the teacher of the law? Where is the philosopher of this age? I know also Scriptures. The Scriptures explain Scriptures. I work with the Word of God, exclusively. I know not word more powerful than the Word of God, believe-me.

You wrote >>>Pasting a bunch of scriptures without making a point means very little.<<<
Well, the one whom God has sent speaks the words of God. The one who is from the earth belongs to the earth, and speaks as one from the earth. The one who comes from above is above all. By the way, the disciple is not above his master: but every one that is perfect shall be as his master, it is enough for the disciple that he be as his master, understand?


You wrote >>>I know others like this, they are Post tribbers (which is dead wrong) and they think by posting scriptures it makes their point, which it doesn't because they seemingly do not understand that which they post. <<<

The Apostle Paul warned: 2The.2:3to12
3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; (man of sin? son of perdition? Do you know who is this satanic Wicked, which will manifest himself in Israel very soon as a messiah? JESUS spoke about him (John.5:43) , about this IMPOSTOR, an usurper.)
4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.
5 Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?
6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.
7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
9 Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish;
because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.


You wrote: >>>Point being: Just because someone post a scripture, doesn't mean that scripture agree with their point of view.<<<

The same is applied for you, no, brother?

You wrote: >>>IMMEDIATELY AFTER the Tribulation the Church returns with Jesus (See Rev. 19), but they think by posting that scripture it creates a point that can't be defeated.<<<
O Rev. 19 speaks about a warrior and
he judges and make war, yes, he makes war against the dragon, and against the Beast and against the false prophet, by the way, from the mouth of this satanic trinity come out three unclean spirits like frogs, they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of THIS great DAY of God Almighty.
And he has a name written that no man knew, but he himself, however the believers call him erroneously of JESUS. Pure invention of the theologians.


You wrote: >>>Make an argument brother, you will learn much more from back and forths when you make an actual argument on a subject.<<<

Brother, we can do nothing against the truth, but for the truth. The Word of God is truth. JESUS left very very clear: John 16:13-15:
13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.
14 He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you.
15 All things that the Father hath are mine: therefore said I, that he shall take of mine, and shall shew it unto you.
 
Upvote 0

Revealing Times

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2016
2,845
420
61
Clanton Alabama
✟123,106.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
The LORD will destroy the Wise is a very telling thing you are saying, because you assume true wisdom is evil and I don't because Solomon was wise as were the Prophets, you miss the whole point of the passage. God is saying I will destroy the WISE MEN "who do not trust in me".... just because you post that scripture has ZERO BEARING where I get my Wisdom from. You think you are using it as a weapon against people, but I have been of the Holy Spirit well over 30 years, my wisdom comes from God, and just because you post that scripture doesn't mean that is where you get your wisdom from is of God, it might be, and it might not be, I don't know you, but I do understand you do not understand what that passage means if you think because you posting it means the Universe is 6000 years old. You can posts scriptures until you are blue in the face, and its not going to change the fact that the universe is 13.7 Billion years old and if you think its 6000 years old then you just missed the boat my friend.


This passage proves you are not called to Prophecy it would seem, which is actually my calling. And John 5:43 is not about the Anti-Christ at all. In Matthew 24 Jesus gave us all of the signs we would see before his Second Coming. Verses 1-6 are about the time from Jesus until the 70 AD Destruction. Verses 7-13/14 is about the time from 70 AD until the Rapture. And verses 14/15-27 is about the Tribulation. That is why Jesus mentions false christs/false prophets three times. In verse 5, in verse 11 and in verse 24.

The John 5:43 scripture is speaking about the false christs before 70 AD, the Pharisees thought rightly that Rome was the Fourth Beast so they were looking for the "Little Horn" to come forth and therefore they expected the Messiah to show up and save them, thus they put forth messiahs quite a few times and that is what Jesus mean by that Scripture....John 5:43 I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.

This was the Pharisees who rejected Christ Jesus accepting false messiahs just before Rome destroyed the Temple and the City of Jerusalem.

I point this out because there are many some I know, who think that scripture is an end time scripture, they think that Israel accepts this false messiah as their messiah when they do no such thing. They accept Jesus as their Messiah see Malachi 4:5-6, Zechariah 12:10 and 13:1)

The supposed falling away from the faith is no such thing, it is the DEPARTURE OF THE CHURCH which the first seven English translations stated it was. There is NO MENTION of faith in the whole passage, but there is a mention of the rapture, the GATHERING TOGETHER UNTO CHRIST.


The Church is in Heaven and RETURNS with Christ Jesus. The other points are obvious !!

Again you posting scriptures proves noting unless you make coherent points.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Papias

Listening to TW4
Dec 22, 2005
3,967
988
59
✟64,806.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I am unfortunately left unconvinced. Perhaps you will tell me it is because of my ignorance in the field,

Yes,that's exactly the case. There is a huge difference between arguing in favor of what the experts say and arguing against what the experts say. That's why Revealing Times has a huge pile of evidence supporting him, and you don't.

If you are arguing against the experts in a field that requires a lot of work to understand all the evidence, then you either have done all that work, or you are likely suffering from the Dunning kruger effect. Think of it - these scientists (most of whom are believers), have studied for years, then done research often for decades, as well as checking the work of others and having their work checked by peer-review. And along comes some bloke on the internet, with practically no understanding even of how the work is done, and says "I am unfortunately left unconvinced. "?!?!! Talk about arrogance.

It's a lot like the case here:

"Hi honey, I'm home!"
"Oh dear, I've been so worried about you- did the doctor have the biopsy results?"
"Yeah, he says I've got stage IV lung cancer, but I am unfortunately left unconvinced. "
"But, didn't he have not just the biopsy results, but also the DNA sequence from the tumor cells, as well as the radiographic data and blood results?"
"sure - but I don't fully understand all that, and I haven't been through medical school, so it all doesn't sway me."
"But didn't he also run it all past Drs Brown and Chahandrakan?"
"Yeah, but that doesn't increase my understanding, of course, so why would that make me more convinced?"
Well, dear, because they are experts too, and know what the data mean. They've spent years to understand the biology involved."
"Experts, shmexperts - I don't see anything about lung cancer, doctors of oncology, medical school, biopsies, DNA, radiography, nor blood proteins in by Bible, and even worse, Dr Chahandrakan worships demons, so I can't accept anything she says, and so I am unfortunately left unconvinced. "
"but our holy scripture was written during the bronze age, dear - it's God communicating to people at the time - in their worldview, none of those things exist - of course God would speak to them at their level and not include any of that."
"Oh, I think they could have understood it. And the scriptures are pretty clear - there is no mention of cancer at all - diseases are most often caused by demons!"
"Maybe it's a demon causing the cancer? In any case, what did the doctor say was next?"
"He said that I needed to start chemotherapy next week - but that's not in the Bible either, so I'll be fasting instead. I don't understand fully how chemo is supposed to work, so it must not work."​

In Christ-

Papias
 
Reactions: Queller
Upvote 0

Oseas

Well-Known Member
Jun 23, 2017
2,409
203
88
Joinville
✟132,526.00
Country
Brazil
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

You wrote: >>>God is not invisible but we simply cannot look upon Him with our earthly form.
Exodus 33: (18-23) 18 And he said, I beseech thee, shew me thy glory. 19 And he said, I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the Lord before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy. 20 And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live. 21 And the Lord said, Behold, there is a place by me, and thou shalt stand upon a rock: 22 And it shall come to pass, while my glory passeth by, that I will put thee in a clift of the rock, and will cover thee with my hand while I pass by: 23 And I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall not be seen.
Moses looked at the back of God and so he must be visible.<<<

Your interpretation of Ex.33:18-23 is literal merely. The letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. God is Spirit, spirit is invisible evidently. In that occasion, JESUS was in the bosom of the Father, even so He appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob by the name of God Almighty, as He revealed to Moses 430 years ahead (Ex.6:v.3) and 2.500 years after the first Adam or two days after the beginning of creation, and He left clear to Moses that by His name, JESUS, He was not known to them. Furthermore, when Moses wrote Genesis 1 he said: In the beginning (in JESUS) God created heavens and the earth, yeah, in the beginning, because the name of the Lord JESUS could not be revealed in that time, understand? Moses did not see the image of the Spirit of God, who he saw at the back was JESUS, not the invisible Spirit of God. (Col.1:15-17) 15 JESUS is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: 16 For by Him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by Him, and for Him: 17 And He is before all things, and by Him all things consist.

You wrote: >>>What you are calling the previous plan is the post.<<<

Well, do not you know ? After de fall of the sons of God in the Garden of Eden, The Most High God and Father of JESUS planned the restoration of all things. This plan of work was revealed unto Moses 2.500 years after Adam, after God have worked two days and half of His plan, inclusive the own birth of Moses, understand? First the Most High God planned the restoration of all things, and after a period of time, He began to execute His plan, in accord He had planned previously.

>>>You do know the mind of God and therefore what you are proposing is a pure assumption.<<<

O no, it is not a pure assumption. You did not understand, in truth the matter is very very deep. I am not speaking of man made of the dust of the earth, he which is of the earth is earthly. I am speaking of the man made in the image of God, the spiritual man. To made spiritual man God was not alone, reason by which He said: Let US (plural) make man in OUR image and in OUR likeness. Please, understand, the earthly man is a creation, the spiritual man is another creation. You need to be born again, yes, you must be born again.

>>>Again, speculation. You are simply assuming God needs to two great works.<<<

O no, it is not speculation. You are without understanding. Without JESUS the Most High God alone(God is Spirit) could not make the spiritual man, reason by which He said: Let US (plural) make man in OUR image and in OUR likeness. But the Holy Spirit also works in the creation of spiritual man. Oh cease you from man, whose breath is in his nostrils: for wherein is he to be accounted of ?

>>>Jesus existed before the world was and not created on the fourth day. Proverbs 8: (22-32)<<<

Yes, JESUS was in the bosom of the Father and in the plan of God was predetermined the birth of JESUS in the fourth Day or four thousand years after the earthly man for salvation of men. The Word was made flesh, the Word is God, understand? By the way, JESUS is the Greater Light and the Holy Spirit is the Lesser light (Gen.1:16), whose name no man kows but he himself.

>>>The Trinity. Your theology is fragmented and full of speculation and has very little Bible support. You show no real coherent connection between the scriptures you point out.<<<

You are being evasive simply. The point is that the natural man receives not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. But he that is spiritual judges all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.
 
Upvote 0

Sapiens

Wisdom is of God
Aug 29, 2015
494
202
Canada
Visit site
✟26,119.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

I don't see how starlight would tell you that the universe is billions of years old... Moreover, in Genesis 1:16, God explicitly creates the stars. After the earth. After the sun and moon. The earth God created on day 3 is our earth. Grass and stuffs grows on it God says. Let's put aside the worldy and humanly ideas for a moment and consider what God himself is saying please.

It doesn't speak of Billions of years, nor of nubelas, nor of Big Bangs. Of course it's possible for God to create the earth and grass before the sun... Nor only is it, but that's what God himself claims to have done...

So what meaning does YOWM have in Exodus 20:9-11? God, yes God, makes a comparison between the timeframe of his creation of the world with the weekdays and the sabbath. Is he using the same word for two completely different measures of time? It sure doesn't look like it!!! "The same way I did this... Indeed in 6 days..." (paraphrasing the verses). He seems to be talking about the same thing here.

No disrespect, but that's indeed all I think it is: your opinion. It doesn't matter that it isn't the same kind of writing or that man's creation is told again but in more details in chapter 2... You have to prove the order mentionned in chapter 1 is not at all what it is... Earth is created first, then the sun and moon, and then the stars. Why mix the order??? He even says the days...

In chapter 2, it doesn't say "on the eighth day I recreated man"... It's obvious to anyone with half a brain that it's only more details that are added to what has previously been told in chapter 1. Verse 4 of chapter 2 even says that "this is the story of the earth and heaven once they were created"... There is no confusion at all here.
 
Upvote 0

Sapiens

Wisdom is of God
Aug 29, 2015
494
202
Canada
Visit site
✟26,119.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

Ok. Everything you quoted takes for granted the Big Bang happened and that's exactly what I DON'T believe... I think God created things just the way He wanted them... The problem with the Big Bang theory is exactly this: it works with natural processes.

No. God made it like He wanted it. There was no mistake possible. It didn't require billions of years of weird accidents and interactions of matter, energy and whatnot. Free will, cause and effect, and time do not require the Big Bang in order to exist... So mentioning that in relation to the BB theory was irrelevant. Life either. He made it like it had to be to work...

I appreciate the effort though, but you have to admit this is not very convincing...
 
Upvote 0

Oseas

Well-Known Member
Jun 23, 2017
2,409
203
88
Joinville
✟132,526.00
Country
Brazil
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
 
Upvote 0

Oseas

Well-Known Member
Jun 23, 2017
2,409
203
88
Joinville
✟132,526.00
Country
Brazil
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
 
Upvote 0

Revealing Times

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2016
2,845
420
61
Clanton Alabama
✟123,106.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
For starters we understand how long it takes light to travel, thus we can calculate how far it has traveled and thus how long its been traveling. Gen. 1:16 says no such thing, I will not try to explain it again, either you can't grasp it or you aren't reading my posts in full. The earth, Sky and Sun are here on the second day, I will not delve any further into the obvious. {You can't even have a Sky (firmament) without the Sun or water without the Sun creating rain !! }

It doesn't speak of Billions of years, nor of nubelas, nor of Big Bangs. Of course it's possible for God to create the earth and grass before the sun... Nor only is it, but that's what God himself claims to have done...

Again, the Laws of Nature do not work as you imply, just because you can't grasp that the Fourth Day is God CREATING SEASONS meaning he placed the MOON in the perfect position, thus creating CERTAIN TIME PERIODS of Sun/Moon/Night/Day/Seasons etc. etc. For some reason this isn't hitting you square in the face that God created the SEASONS, not the Sun on the fourth day. It boggles my mind why people can't understand that a Sun and its planets all are formed at the same time.


I don't know, I haven't looked at it, but I do understand that YOWM has 50 or more meanings, and period of time is one of them and "TO BE HOT" is the original meaning. Not DAY. So it is according to Context what word would be placed in what verse.


I don't have to PROVE ANYTHING, that is just the same thing I tell to atheists, its your soul I tell them, and thus its ON YOU....I will tell you likewise, if you want to believe in this its not going to hurt your Faith in God/Christian Walk, but if you spread untruths, it could keep some others from the understanding of God and His truths, because they might see your Faith as not based in reality, because they might see you as believing untruths in Science and thus see your Faith as baseless (IN THEIR OPINION). That takes away chances to lead men to Christ. (My original reason for studying this IN DEPTH over a two year period of time was to do away with the "Santa Clause Effect" whereas I can get at the truth, no matter what the truth is.)

I am here to offer deep truths instead of the same old arguments from both sides that have failed. The facts are on my side, the science is what it is, but at the same time I allow for God as the Creator, whereas the Atheist doesn't, and by presenting facts I threaten the Atheists lies, and expose them. It's like telling kids there is a Santa Clause then he questions you on Jesus when he gets in college, saying if you lied about Santa you probably lied about Jesus too.

Just like I refuse to lie to my kids about Santa, I also want to give my kids the facts about the universe and how it was Created, so some lying Atheist college professor can't seduce them, thus I seek the facts instead of some fairy tale. That's just me brother.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Revealing Times

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2016
2,845
420
61
Clanton Alabama
✟123,106.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Ir seems you miss the forest for the trees. The Big Bang PROVES GOD !!!

In the 1800's the Scientists all believed the universe was "Eternal" and thus had no need of being "CREATED" by a God of the Bible. Then two Scientists heard the ECHO of the Big Bang, and thus the Scientists all had to ADMIT the Universe had a Beginning { In the Beginning, God Created the Heavens and the Earth}.

So you are arguing against that which proves God said Let there be Light !! I don't get your argument, at all.
You are wrong, and you will see you are wrong in Heaven. You do not even get that the Big Bang PROVES God brother. You really should study more on this subject.

I appreciate the effort though, but you have to admit this is not very convincing...
I am not here to convince you, but to speak truth to power.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Sapiens

Wisdom is of God
Aug 29, 2015
494
202
Canada
Visit site
✟26,119.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

"Yes,that's exactly the case. There is a huge difference between arguing in favor of what the experts say and arguing against what the experts say. That's why Revealing Times has a huge pile of evidence supporting him, and you don't."

I beg your pardon? What evidence??? I have adressed every argument Revealing Times has presented me. Of course, I do not deny what you are saying. I am no expert in the field of astronomy. So does that mean I have to blindly believe anything that an "expert" tells me??? I think it is perfectly appropriate to remain skeptical, especially when I have good resons to be. I didn't just discard with a whim of the hand what Revealing Times is saying, I am asking him to vulgarize the evidence or to offer me an external source I can go check out. Is understanding of the evidence and of the theory reserved only for a certain intellectual elite? The rest of us idiots should just shut up and agree? Of course I am skeptical of what I don't understand!!!

"If you are arguing against the experts in a field that requires a lot of work to understand all the evidence, then you either have done all that work, or you are likely suffering from the Dunning kruger effect. Think of it - these scientists (most of whom are believers), have studied for years, then done research often for decades, as well as checking the work of others and having their work checked by peer-review. And along comes some bloke on the internet, with practically no understanding even of how the work is done, and says "I am unfortunately left unconvinced. "?!?!! Talk about arrogance. "

So because they are "experts" means they cannot be wrong??? There are still shamans in some third-worldly tribes today. Surely they are experts in their fields. So all they do and say must be right. Right? "Expert" does not equal "holder of absolute truth"; It's just someone with a lot of knowldege and/or experience in a certain domain. You can be an expert in stupidities. Moreover, I offered you a list of creationist scientists. So no, I am not disagreeing with the experts, or at least not all of them.

Otherwise, I do not pretend to have more knowledge than them, but I believe the way they interpret the evidence is wrong. Yet I am here. That means I am curious to learn more and am open to be convinced. "Talk about arrogance"? Do you know what section of the website this is? It's the DEBATE section. Your job is to convince me of your stuff. My job is to convince you of MY stuff. What?! Should I just I just agree with all you're saying like an idiot??? How about you, I've presented you with a list of creationist scientist, why do you disagree with the experts? Are you arrogant too?

Most of whom are believers? Where do you get that idea? Anyhow, it doesn't really matter for this debate. In wouldn't prove or anything anyways.

"It's a lot like the case here:

"Hi honey, I'm home!"
"Oh dear, I've been so worried about you- did the doctor have the biopsy results?"
"Yeah, he says I've got stage IV lung cancer, but I am unfortunately left unconvinced. "
"But, didn't he have not just the biopsy results, but also the DNA sequence from the tumor cells, as well as the radiographic data and blood results?"
"sure - but I don't fully understand all that, and I haven't been through medical school, so it all doesn't sway me."
"But didn't he also run it all past Drs Brown and Chahandrakan?"
"Yeah, but that doesn't increase my understanding, of course, so why would that make me more convinced?"
Well, dear, because they are experts too, and know what the data mean. They've spent years to understand the biology involved."
"Experts, shmexperts - I don't see anything about lung cancer, doctors of oncology, medical school, biopsies, DNA, radiography, nor blood proteins in by Bible, and even worse, Dr Chahandrakan worships demons, so I can't accept anything she says, and so I am unfortunately left unconvinced. "
"but our holy scripture was written during the bronze age, dear - it's God communicating to people at the time - in their worldview, none of those things exist - of course God would speak to them at their level and not include any of that."
"Oh, I think they could have understood it. And the scriptures are pretty clear - there is no mention of cancer at all - diseases are most often caused by demons!"
"Maybe it's a demon causing the cancer? In any case, what did the doctor say was next?"
"He said that I needed to start chemotherapy next week - but that's not in the Bible either, so I'll be fasting instead. I don't understand fully how chemo is supposed to work, so it must not work."


There are a few differences in your analogy. First of all, someone's life is at stake. Second of all, surely the person is experiencing some symptoms. Third of all, the doctor can show him at least one piece of evidence the patient can understand : radio-imagery. You can see the spots that don't belong there. In any case, the man is still free not to accept the diagnosis or the treatment. Now that would be stupid because plenty of people die of cancer. The mention of scripture in your story is not the same as with this debate we're having here... It's not just that it isn't mentionned in the Bible, it's that the Bible contradicts it blatantly!!!!!!! It's not compatible!!!!!! I would be skeptical of chemotherapy too. Not so long ago "experts", doctors, were bleeding people as a form of treatment. Even less long ago, they took people's teeth out for the same reasons... Wow. Let's trust blindly the experts. It's obvious you haven't spent a lot of time in the medical system. I have. I have also experienced first hand their idiotic mistakes on several occasions. That is mainly where my skepticism of the "experts" arose.

BTW, we all have the same evidence, you just put your own story on it. I put the Bible's story on it.​
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Sapiens

Wisdom is of God
Aug 29, 2015
494
202
Canada
Visit site
✟26,119.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

Fair enough then. Quantum physics are beyond me. I don't think he explained it well, but anyways, I agree with his conclusion, so...

I'd just like to understand how a picture of stars can tell you the age of the universe. Obviously, there is more to it than that.

How do we know their distance? How do we know from what distance the light was emitted towards us?
 
Upvote 0

Sapiens

Wisdom is of God
Aug 29, 2015
494
202
Canada
Visit site
✟26,119.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I don't have time right now, but I'll respond to your other posts later.


No no no. Not at all. You and me both agree on the same premiss: God creates the universe. It's the how we're disagreeing with. The way I see it, the Big Bang is just another atheistic model. The difference is, it includes a beginning. But atheist will just say it magically appeared out of nowhere...

I don't miss the point. I very much get the implications of the theory for God. I just don't think it's true anyways... The reassuring part, is that we should all come to the conclusion that God had to create this universe.

You are wrong, and you will see you are wrong n Heaven. You do not even get that the Big Bang PROVES God brother. You really should study more on this subject.

I have and I will. Of course I get it... I wouldn't hesitate to use the kalaam cosmological argument or another of the sort to convince people that God is the first cause and all. I just don't think there was a big bang and all that followed. But my biggest problem is with the theory of evolution. You might manage to fit the big bang in the text with some contorsions and still keep a sound theology, but the theory of evolution is plainly and completely incompatible with the Bible and our faith. I might explain that later, but now I have to go to bed!

O am not here to convince you, but to speak truth to power.

I hope you will keep trying anyways.
 
Upvote 0