• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Similes, or literal?

EdMa

Regular Member
Dec 6, 2008
442
14
In The Interweb.
✟23,157.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
"But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day [is] with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day." 2 Peter 3:8

I heard so many people use this verses to support theistic evolution, but my question is can we really?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
D

dies-l

Guest
Generally, I have seen that argument used by OECs more than I have seen it used by TEs. I tend to lean toward TE myself, and I would tend to avoid that argument.

As for your question of whether the verse is literal or metaphor/simile. I think language is pretty clear that it is a simile. Peter (and the psalmist that he is referencing) is not saying that one human day is a thousand years to God and that a thousand human years is like a day to God. He is saying that God's time and our time are radically different. He is dealing with eschatological concerns of his readers concerning the imminent return of Christ. He is reminding them that His return is on God's time not ours.

But, as an argument for Theistic Evolution, I don't think that this verse adds anything.
 
Upvote 0
D

dies-l

Guest
I got it confused then, sorry! I know I hear this verse use for some kind of origin theology argument... Just didn't remember which.

OECs typically argue that the creation narrative is basically literal, at least in regard to the order and mechanism of creation, but that each day in the narrative is an eon of time, not necessarily 24 hours days. This verse helps them to make that argument without deviating too much from a relatively literal reading. TEs generally don't care about deviating from a literal interpretation.
 
Upvote 0

Yekcidmij

Presbyterian, Polymath
Feb 18, 2002
10,469
1,453
East Coast
✟270,617.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
"But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day [is] with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day." 2 Peter 3:8

I heard so many people use this verses to support theistic evolution, but my question is can we really?

Thanks!

No, it's just a figure of speech. It should be obvious from the text that Peter isn't giving some sort of ruling on the philosophy of time.
 
Upvote 0