I think you need to look the word up in Hebrew. There is clearly a difference between the word adamah and the word erets. "Adamah (Biblical Hebrew : אדמה) is a word, translatable as ground or earth, which occurs in the Biblical account of Creation of the Book of Genesis." (Wiki) Adamah is a word used for the land that Adam came from. Eden in the Bible was a bio diverse eco system. This is something you can read about in your High School Biology book .
Also you have to realize that Noah's flood is a Paradigm that has many meaning and applications. So the Bible needs to be very exact and precise in the way this Paradigm is presented. We see this when Moses talks about the temple. Every tiny detail in the temple has meaning and a lesson to be learned.
Noah's flood as a paradigm represents a world wide flood. But his flood in his day was what we would call a local flood. You got to get real and join us in the real world. There is overwhelming scientific evidence to show that Noah's flood was NOT a world wide flood.
Look, the bible was made for the 5-7 grade reading levels. I will not be fooled into thinking that, for example, verses 19 and 20 are meant to be local and not everything. You just cannot get passed the context friend.
אֲדָמָה ʼădâmâh, ad-aw-maw'; from
H119; soil (from its general redness):—country, earth, ground, husband(-man) (-ry), land.
Yes, the word earth is included in the description of "earth" in Genesis chapters 6-8. Meant to mean, earth.
Just follow the context:
Gen.7:19 = And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth (adamah); and all the high hills, that were under the
whole heaven (the part you missed), were covered.
By indicating to all who read, even saying land, instead of earth, would indicate ALL land under the "whole heaven". This means everything, all lands. The entire earth.
Gen 7:21 =
And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of
every creeping thing that creepeth
upon the earth,
and every man:
Lets just throw another one in here and combine this example here,
Genesis 7:19 = And the waters prevailed
exceedingly upon the earth; and
all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.
Again, even if adamah was meant to mean just land, and not earth, you are still faced with the dilemma of the word "all" and "every".
Let me give an example:
If I were to say, "Give me all the cookies you have, every last one"
Does this mean...
1- Just the ones in the living room
2- Just the ones on the left side of the house
3- Just the ones at your work office
4- All the cookies you own no matter the location of the cookies
When "all" and "every" are used, it implies, no, directly states that I mean every last single cookie you have that you own regardless of location. If you own it, I want it.
The case is the same when it says "all the high hills...under the whole heaven" and "every man" etc etc, when "all flesh died".
I believe what you have missed is context when combining the word "adamah" with words like "all", "every", and "under the whole heaven".
When faced with that combination, you are forced with the conclusion that it was the entire earth.
Noah's flood as a paradigm represents a world wide flood. But his flood in his day was what we would call a local flood. You got to get real and join us in the real world. There is overwhelming scientific evidence to show that Noah's flood was NOT a world wide flood.
I am in the real world friend. My reading comprehension is not lacking either. I have also seen the scientific evidence as well. Fish bones found in the Nevada great basin, fish bones found in the Himalayas, fish bones found in many places around the world that would not be otherwise possible unless the flood was indeed world wide, covering all the earth. Just a tiny sample of evidence.
Noah also would not have needed and ark as God could have sent him elsewhere. Noah would not have needed God to gather ALL the animals 2 by 2 if it were local. God could have just sent the animals elsewhere. These actions would have been pointless if it were local.
Side note: You do know that the Ararat Mountain range has a peak height of almost 17k feet, right? I will leave you with this thought about how in the world that flood could possibly be local. Let's be real.
Its like you skip all the fine print. If you had to sign a contract, you make it seem like your one of those ones that read the first few lines, gets board and then skips to the bottom and signs not seeing the rest of the information. Even if you did read it, would you even see it correctly since you cannot decipher the context of sentence structure.
You make God a liar. God is the true author of scripture. Sure Moses's hand jotted the words of the first five books, but it was God who moved him to do so (2 Peter 1:21). God is the one who is the true author (2 Timothy 3:16). By telling us the God didn't say "all flesh died...every man" and "water prevailed...upon the earth...all the high hills covered... under the whole heaven", you call Him a liar. And if you are not calling Him a liar, you are surely saying that God made a mistake.
I am happy to see that you attempted to fight the case for God, however you hinder it by giving out false information and leading people to believe something that is entirely wrong and proven wrong.
informational link for you, if you cared to see.
http://genesisapologetics.com/wp-co...Facts-Was-the-Genesis-Flood-Local-3-23-15.pdf