Shouldn't the first 3 verses of Genesis 2 really be at the end of Genesis 1?

[JIMINZ]

There is no discrepancy between the 2 passages.
The passage in Luke doesn't say who answered Jesus' question of what the lord of the vineyard would do to the husbandmen.
All it says is that they heard it.
It is pure assumption to make the claim that Jesus answered His own question.

Jesus clearly asked the question in verse 15, and just as clearly answered the question in verse 16.

None of that is important, but what is important is what Jesus proceeded to say in verses 17,18.

What Jesus said up to verse 17 was Parable, what He spoke in 17,18 IS TRUTH.

 

[ewq1938]

Let's get back to the OP subject. The first part of Genesis 2 really doesn't belong in that chapter as it speaks of the events of the first chapter and looks like a summary which means it should be in Gen 1.