AACJ
Please Pray
- Nov 17, 2016
- 1,975
- 1,584
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Republican
Why would you use this comparison example? Are you implying that because it is "natural" (appropriate?) in the first case, then it should be natural in the second?The former use of the plural pronoun is inherited if you cannot obviously identify the gender of a person. You just replace man/woman with person and it is automatic. "That man is getting his haircut" turns into "that person is getting their haircut". This is natural if we are not sure but should we comply if we are sure (or at least think we are) and/or upon request not to be called he/she but by another pronoun?
Let's get to the most important issue here. We must have an authoritative base from which to address the morality of accommodating transgenderism in any of its aspects or at any level. Is the 66 books of the Bible to be the only rule for faith and practice? Is the Bible in fact our ultimate guide for what we believe and do? It should be.
Last edited:
Upvote
0