Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
For those interested, male microchimerism in women without sons. Notice that the prevalence is highest in women who got abortions. Can you figure out why?
Male microchimerism in women without sons: quantitative assessment and correlation with pregnancy history. - PubMed - NCBI
To answer your second paragraph, and I'd prefer not to get into too much in this thread, but Scripture can be BOTH inerrant, and have a cultural context. In your comment above, it's implies these are mutually exclusive, they are not.That said, I was wondering about how you feel about the inerrancy of the Bible. Do you believe it's entirely of God or do you think parts of it (such as what Paul said in 1 Corinthians 11:9 "for indeed man was not created for the woman’s sake, but woman for the man’s sake.") is simply cultural and doesn't apply to us?
What's that "part" you lose? Where did it go? Can I eventually find it again?While I agree how that was done is distasteful and weird as heck, the one true fact is anyone who has sex before marriage is giving part of themselves away. A part they cannot get back for their honeymoon night when they marry. Its a part you regret giving out if not married.
To answer your second paragraph, and I'd prefer not to get into too much in this thread, but Scripture can be BOTH inerrant, and have a cultural context. In your comment above, it's implies these are mutually exclusive, they are not.
Part of hermeneutics is understanding cultural context, and yes, I personally would think understanding this is necessary to understanding Scripture.
If you mean't before... do I pick and choose what I think is right in certain areas of the Bible, I try not to do that. Feel free to PM me if you want though, I'd be more than happy to answer questions about myself.Of course everything in the Bible has a cultural context, and of course understanding that is essential to understanding parts of scripture, but that's not really what I was getting at. However, if that's outside the scope of this thread I won't push for an answer.
I do think this exercise was somewhat poorly thought out. Forcing shame on people really isn't the point, you can't scare people into genuine faith, faith is a gift and with faith naturally comes shame at disobeying our creator. As a teaching exercise it is sorely lacking. In the first place, it definitely applies every bit as much to the man as it does to the woman. Adultery is adultery and fornication is fornication regardless of who's committing it and in that sense everyone loses. What it should be about is how indulging in sin gives us up more to the world and in doing so takes us further away from God. It's natural to expect we'd feel shame in doing this if we're truly repentant. I can understand, of course, why parents might feel uncomfortable having this subject taught outside the home.
How do you lose "purity", like... where does it go? Once you lose it, can you find it again?Tetra, believe what you will. My analogy makes sense if you think of the old school women trying to preserve rather than lose their "purity" or "virtue".
Of course, the loss of virginity is a big deal. God commands his children to preserve it until marriage.While I agree how that was done is distasteful and weird as heck, the one true fact is anyone who has sex before marriage is giving part of themselves away. A part they cannot get back for their honeymoon night when they marry. Its a part you regret giving out if not married.
Haha, it's not an echo chamber.Is that a serious question man? Lol.
I think you're looking for an echo chamber, like many here seem to be doing.
Hope you find what you're looking for.
What's that "part" you lose? Where did it go? Can I eventually find it again?
Also, do you have Scripture to back your position?
This activity had good intention perhaps. For boys to think twice before having pre-marital sex. For boys to respect girls more. To discourage promiscuity.
But in reality, I think it may have disastrous consequences. For both girls and boys to develop a guilt/shame about sex.
......except the hymen?This whole idea of "losing" something is simply not true...
Okay, what you're talking about here is very subjective... and dependent on the culture one resides.The parts a woman looses are her virginity, her virtue, her self respect, her pride, her reputation, her respect, and sometimes her dignity.
Women (or really what we are talking about here are girls) are much more sensitive than boys. Many times boys seldom care who or what they have sex with as long as they can get some moisture and/or some motion introduced to their private parts. They may or may not care if a girl even likes them. Some do care. I always have been very sensitive in that area. I still do not go through what a girl goes through during/after sex. A young girl is unsure of herself and gives herself to someone with the hope that he will be there for her emotionally. She literally accepts him into herself on more than one level. He is in control. He is the one who gets the pleasure (teenage boys hurt the girl more often than give her sexual pleasure) and when it's over, he has all the power to treat her well and with care or treat her like trash and she will likely feel like whichever one he chooses even if it is for a limited time. The more guys she does it with, the less she cares about how the guys feels about her, how she feels about the guys, her reputation, and her safety but deep down her spirit dies a little more as she grows colder, more cynical, more depressed and believes in true love less and less.
For some reason many boys do not have these issues with sex but some do, especially if they are having sex with older women.
I haven't read the other replies, but what the "youth pastor" did was a bit idiotic.I was having a conversation with my wife about an experience she had in youth group as a young lady. This activity in youth groups was all the rage in the early 90's.
She said the youth pastor would have the girls hold a piece of paper while boys, one by one, would come up and rip a piece off (odd how the boys don't hold the paper).
The youth pastor would then claim that by having sex, girls lose a "piece of themselves". Like, how each boy owned a piece of the paper.
Okay, not only is this story so freaking disturbing and disgusting to me, if it was my daughter that this happened to in the youth group, I can't image how I'd react.
Where the heck is this in the Bible??
Did you have sex before marriage? If not then you won't understand what is lost. Its not a physical piece of anything that is lost (well I mean not counting the hymen of course). I mean you lose a part of yourself. Its hard to explain. When you are pregnant and you lose the baby (miscarriage) aside from losing the baby you also feel like you lose something deeper... a piece of yourself. Or when you when you become saved or leave God... you also lose something that is not physical.Haha, it's not an echo chamber.
Here's the thing, I believe I know the answer. Truth is, you can't "lose" a piece of yourself, that's a weird Christianese saying that's been popularized in our subculture with little to no Scriptural basis. It's silly, there is no "piece" to lose. Maybe physiologically, as a female, you lose your hymen... if it's intact, but that's about it.
If you have sex out of wedlock, part of your soul isn't missing, no piece is lost never to be found, nothing... your life isn't over, and you're a normal sinner like us all. Ask forgiveness and work on not doing it again.
This whole idea of "losing" something is simply not true...
I'd suggest those are cultural norms which may or may not be relevant. It's very subjective.Tetra,
hmm, I think I get you. Well this might be silly to say, but I've always understood the phrase "losing a part of yourself" to be a figure of speech, not that some physical substance or object is literally being taken, as per that paper.
But many of the things being referred to, such as some that rturner76 mentioned like virginity, reputation, etc., though they are abstract and not physical objects, they are still very real.
Is this what you're getting at though? That the Bible doesn't teach that a physical object or a physical substance isn't lost when a woman has casual sex?
......or may be relevant.Okay, what you're talking about here is very subjective... and dependent on the culture one resides.
There is no Biblical basis though, to support the idea if you have sex, you lose your self respect, or your pride, or insert whatever. Those are cultural norms which may or may not be relevant.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?