Sex during separation

[allhart]

Look,In God's covenant with you and her in which you became one in flesh. Not the worlds standards in which marriage isn't binding or taken seriously as to death do you part! If she leave's and she has sex outside of marriage you are in your right's to have a divorce,but if that criteria haven't been meet.It's between you and God, however you dating(as stated sex during separation, not divorced) is like putting hot fiery coals to your bosom and expecting not be burned. Is ludicrous!

 

[allhart]

Look at the story behind Joesph. He did everything in God's eye's

 

[dad]

Look,In God's covenant with you and her in which you became one in flesh. Not the worlds standards in which marriage isn't binding or taken seriously as to death do you part! If she leave's and she has sex outside of marriage you are in your right's to have a divorce,

The woman left in the example, and the real reason is unknown. Since the contract was torn up, and tossed out by one party, the innocent party cannot be bound to it. Not from anything in the bible I have seen. Which of Solomon's wives was he one flesh with? If one of them ran off, is he supposed to become a eunuch? Should Abraham have gone without after the other wife was put away? Should Jesus not take a bride, if the old one was unfaithful?

If the adultery in the example that was known about was forgiven, and we do not know the recent cause of dumping the hubby, does that still count as adultery? Or was the known adultery washed away by forgiveness?

but if that criteria haven't been meet.It's between you and God, however you dating(as stated just separated) is like put hot fiery coals to your bosom and expecting not be burned. Is ludicrous!

Dating after being dumped is ludicrous? I think men running around frustrated, and hypocritically pretending to obey God is ludicrous. Funny I don't see anyone actually mounting a bible case. I have to really suspect this is just old wive's tales, and misconceptions.

 

[dad]

Look at the story behind Joesph. He did everything in God's eye's

Everything except obey the wife of his master! And the new testament hadn't even commanded it yet anyhow! Try to focus.

 

[allhart]

The woman left in the example, and the real reason is unknown. Since the contract was torn up, and tossed out by one party, the innocent party cannot be bound to it. Not from anything in the bible I have seen. Which of Solomon's wives was he one flesh with? If one of them ran off, is he supposed to become a eunuch? Should Abraham have gone without after the other wife was put away? Should Jesus not take a bride, if the old one was unfaithful?

If the adultery in the example that was known about was forgiven, and we do not know the recent cause of dumping the hubby, does that still count as adultery? Or was the known adultery washed away by forgiveness?


Dating after being dumped is ludicrous? I think men running around frustrated, and hypocritically pretending to obey God is ludicrous. Funny I don't see anyone actually mounting a bible case. I have to really suspect this is just old wive's tales, and misconceptions.

Covenants are different than contract. As far as the rule in Solomon and his wives. I don't know when God changed the subduing of the earth to having only one wife ,but it was changed and to notice having all those wives compromised his life with God and its self evident,so he was unevenly yoked in marriage for he marred unbelievers for his, so called peace on the war front. Like i said he was compromised by his own sexual demise and it self evident. Further more I think historically they could only take on more wive if they could afford to. I can barely afford one. lol

 

[dad]

Covenants are different than contract. As far as the rule in Solomon and his wives. I don't know when God changed the subduing of the earth to having only one wife

Prove it was changed. I seem to recall deacons, or some such were to have just one wife. So you do not know about the rules as applying to Solomon, or which ones he was one flesh with, etc. OK.

Where is marriage defined as a covenant, and a contract ruled out, by the way, since you just claimed that? Hopefully you aren't making stuff up.

but it was changed and to notice having all those wives compromised his life with God and its self evident,so he was unevenly yoked in marriage for he marred unbelievers for his, so called peace on the war front.

Well, how many wives did Hitler have? He was damaged, I'd say as well. What about Judas, was it women that damaged him? So, do at least post the time and place and verses that show us when this changed.

Like i said he was compromised by his own sexual demise and it self evident. Further more I think historically they could only take on more wive if they could afford to. I can barely afford one. lol

If money is the only issue, many would be able to afford it. But in the example here, how expensive is dating? The guy never took on more wives, he simply continued living after getting dumped in an unbiblical way.

 

[Nathan45]

Slaves were used sexually by males and also by females. Romans had a very healthy view of sex.

You think sex-slavery is healthy?

 

[max1120]

Allhart...I am not sure that God ever changed the Laws regarding marriage or diviorce. Moses allowed divorce as premitted by God (ghet) or writ of divorce was given. As far as plural marriage thats a great question, I am not sure it was ever eliminated by God. I am not sure that is workable in moderen society but I am not convinced that it would be a sin per say.

 

[max1120]

Nathan45....sex slaves?? no I am not suggesting slavery of any kind is good. I was only commenting on how the Romans and for that matter the Greeks also had a very healthy attitude of sex as natural and not shameful.

 

[dad]

Allhart...I am not sure that God ever changed the Laws regarding marriage or diviorce. Moses allowed divorce as premitted by God (ghet) or writ of divorce was given. As far as plural marriage thats a great question, I am not sure it was ever eliminated by God. I am not sure that is workable in moderen society but I am not convinced that it would be a sin per say.

Interesting. Reminds me of a story in the missionary days of early North America. One chief had four wives, and a missionary said he had to get rid of three of them. 'Ok' the chief said, 'you tell um'.