Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You're entitled to your opinion.Your boolean standards are flawed.
You're entitled to your opinion.
But I was asked why I argue against reality, and I submitted my 'flawed' Boolean standards as the reason I do so.
Are you saying you still don't understand why I argue against reality?
If so, how can I change my answer to suit both of our tastes simultaneously?
I understand why you think it's flawed.I just wanted to make sure you understand that your reasoning is flawed.
I might be irrational in your opinion, but at least I know why I argue against reality.Skreeper said:I understand why you argue against reality but I was hoping that you at least try to be rational.
As long as you understand why I keep arguing against physical reality, my 'crap' has answered your question.
I understand why you think it's flawed.
You're an atheist: so of course you would.
You don't understand what? my standards?I really dont understand,
If you are 'underwhelmed' by my answers, then I have to suspect the problem lies on your side ... not mine.VirOptimus said:... I see your arguments but they are quite underwhelming.
Is there something I can help you understand about why I argue against reality, Skreeper?This has nothing to do with me being an Atheist. Using the bible as an axiom is unjustified.
This might be a shock for you, but not every Christian views the Bible as the inerrant holy book you make it out to be.
If I want your opinion, I'll ask for it.As I said, I understand why you do it but in doing so you're being irrational.
I think he was just trying to give you the physical evidence to support his standards so that you could understandThis has nothing to do with me being an Atheist. Using the bible as an axiom is unjustified.
This might be a shock for you, but not every Christian views the Bible as the inerrant holy book you make it out to be.
If I want your opinion, I'll ask for it.
And we see GOD sir just as we see the Bible
And we know the Bible is GOD's WORD
Therefore, if you substituted Bible for GOD in these steps then maybe you would understand that there is no "flaw" at all in this logic since GOD is sovereign over all things
No i dont
However if I am eating with one who follows these rules and according to their traditions I know this is an offense to them I won't eat a ham sandwich
You don't understand what? my standards?
You don't have to understand them, just accept that I submitted them as an answer to your question.
Hopefully you've learned something and won't ask it again.
But if you do, I'll take the liberty to give you the exact same answer as I always have.If you are 'underwhelmed' by my answers, then I have to suspect the problem lies on your side ... not mine.
Educatee: Why do you cut down trees?
Lumberjack: Because I'm a lumberjack.
Educatee: Lumberjack standards are flawed.
Lumberjack: You're entitled to your opinion; but do you understand why I cut down trees now?
No. I am not mistakenCorrection: You think you see god. Could you be mistaken though?
How do you know?
You start with demonstrating that a god exists, then we can talk about why we should treat the Bible as something special.
Maybe one day your husband will?Yeah, okay. Whatever you say.
Maybe one day you can show me this alleged line.
Maybe one day your husband will?
Why not consider listening to his testimony?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?