I think all the folks discussing this (with the possible exception of Yitzak) are confusing "boundaries" with "controlling." Let me be as brief as possible.
"Boundaries" means what I will and will not allow in my life. Envision a little white picket fence around you. You have the right to decide who you will and will not allow in that white picket fence, and you have the right to decide the type of treatment you will and will not allow in that white picket fence. Thus, a boundary has nothing whatsoever to do with the other guy. A real boundary is all about me and what I will and will not allow to have access to me. A boundary CAN be self-centered and not take into account the needs, wants, desires of the other person--but more accurately, a HEALTHY boundary is about me and the kind of life and people I want to have around me. Healthy consequences have what I call "natural consequences" and that is not a punishment--it is the natural thing that occurs if the other person decides to break the boundary. A very real example of a perfect Godly boundary is that God the Father will only allow perfect, sinless people in His presence. [Please note that God does not say "You must be sinless." We were free to choose to be sinners and completely mess up (which we did) and the natural consequence of that is that now we can not be with God because of our sin.]
"Controlling" on the other hand is about the other guy. It's about setting rules for HIM/HER. It's about
telling other people what they can and can not do, and giving punishment under the guise of "consequences." Controlling is manipulation. Period. You are trying to use every trick in the book to get someone else to do something--and if they DON"T do it your way, they get punished. I'm sure you can all think of examples of control and manipulation.
Thus, let's talk through the example of the Godly boundary of "only perfect sinless beings can be in God's presence." This is His boundary. He is not being selfish to declare so--just establish what He is and is not willing to accept. Also, He does not force us to be sinless and perfect, not does He pull tricks to "make" us be sinless and perfect. We are completely free to be sinful and imperfect! But the natural consequence is that if we make that choice, then we are not able to be in God's presence.
NOW here comes the loving part that some many people mix up!!! It is NOT, NOT, NOT loving to someone to prevent them from experiencing the natural consequences of their personal choices. To do that actually keeps the person immature and irresponsible!! It is the Godly, loving thing to do to allow someone to make their choices, but then allow them to experience the consequence of the choice--good or bad. The natural consequence of disobeying God and marrying an unsaved man is pain and heartache as the family breaks up years later in a divorce. The natural consequence of chosing to OBEY God and marry a saved man is years of a happy, godly marriage! See the consequence thing? It's what naturally would occur!
If that were the end of it, then all of us would be condemned with no hope--because we ARE sinful and we CAN NOT be in God's presence. Here's the "Love like God" part. Note, that God does not say, "Well I just will ignore that part--no one has to pay that" because that is unjust! Same for us to say that our spouse does not have to experience the consequence of what THEY chose! It's unjust. Nope, in His LOVE, God provided a second chance--another way that also paid the consequence. So when it says in the Bible that we are to love as God loved us, it doesn't mean be a wishy-washy push over -OR- be a controlling manipulator to get your way. It means "allow the one you love to experience the consequence of what they chose, but offer them another way to make it right with you and come back to you." Does that make sense?
Let's get specific. In the instance of hisbloodformysins, it would NOT be a "boundary" for her to say to him: "You have to stop humping on me like a dog or I won't kiss you anymore." That is just controlling with punishment. See that? But it would be a "boundary" to say "I have decided that I want to have gentle, loving, caressing sexuality in my life and I don't want to have bumping and grinding sexuality. You are completely free to have whatever kind of sexuality you choose to have--I'm not nagging you about that anymore. But I have decided I will not be responsive to grabbing and groping and I will be VERY responsive to kissing, nuzzling, hugs and mutual touching that is gentle. " Then if he decides to be gropey, that is his decision. Cool. He can pick whatever he likes! But the result is a turned-off, unreceptive wife. If he wants a turned-on, receptive wife he is JUST as free to obtain that by choosing to do what you have decided to allow in your "boundary."
Can you see the difference?
Furthermore, he's bound to test it and make poor choices at first, etc. but just be consistent and to love him in a God-like way, give him a second chance/another way to get to you. If he blows it and then realizes he blew it and goes immediately to gentle touches, give him the solution of how he can "fix it." Men LOVE to "fix it" so if there is some way he can make the mistake, realize it, and then have you go, "Honey, that really violated my boundary. Thus I will need a walk for about 15 minutes to mellow out and get my head into a place where I might be able to be in the mood again. It would be REALLY helpful to getting myself ready if all the candles were lit when I came back."
Once again--can you see the difference between the respectful request of lighting candles (He has the freedom to choose to do it or not) and "making" him light candles in order to "make it up to you" and "making" him do it your way? One way, he is completely free to be an ape about sex if that's what he chooses to be, and he can jump around and be all whatever! The natural consequence is that he is choosing to have a wife that is not able to get turned-on. The OTHER way, he is forced to do it YOUR way or else he's punished with "not getting any" or "having to make up for it" and never really ever catching up or even being ahead.
Hope this helps! "Boundaries" are not about telling the other guy what they can and can not do. "Boundaries" are about YOU!
~Faithful