• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

See, It's Not Just Homosexuas...

davedjy

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,184
1,080
Southern California
✟33,592.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
I have disproved it, repeatedly. Endless reposting of links to homosexual website with NO, NONE, ZERO credible, verifiable, historical, or lexical, grammatical evidence, only the unsupported opinions of some anonymous dood, is NOT proof of anything but frantic desperation.

Irrefutable proof from the time Moses delivered the law, to the Israelites, ca. 1200 BC, until the present, Jewish scholars interpreted the O.T. scriptures as condemning ALL same gender sex acts; by ALL persons, male and female; at ALL times, in ALL places, and under ALL circumstances, NO exceptions. The early church fathers also interpreted the scriptures as condemning ALL homosexual acts, with
NO exceptions.

The Talmud and the ECF did NOT even mention, and did NOT limit the condemnation of homosexual acts to, “homosexual rape,” “temple prostitution,” pagan temples and/or pagan religious activities!

Recent posts: Evidence from Talmud, and other ancient Jewish writings, Link

Evidence from early church fathers, Link

This evidence spans approximately 1500 years of church history, from 1200 BC through 300 AD.
The Talmud isn't the end-all, be all, and you are AT BEST quoting DOCTRINE, which doesn't necessarily represent the truth.

I quoted Scholars for my findings!
 
Upvote 0

davedjy

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,184
1,080
Southern California
✟33,592.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
2. Call-boys
"I sat amazed as I heard the Bible being invoked in ways that were wholly inappropriate to any canons of biblical scholarship. Perhaps something snapped in me...for better or worse I decided somebody needed to provide resources that would give both clarity and honesty." -- Robbin Scroggs.
Robbin Scroggs feels that arsenokoitai refers to a man who uses the services of "call-boys", and that malakoi refers to those "call-boys". In his book, "The New Testament and Homosexuality", Scroggs writes, "If the malakos points to the effeminate call-boy, then the arsenokoites in this context must be the active partner who keeps the malakos as a 'mistress' or who hires him on occasion to satisfy his sexual desires. No more than molakos is to be equated with the youth in general, the eromenos, can arsenokoites be equated with the adult in general, the erastes" (pg. 108).

The Jerusalem Bible, German 1968, agrees with Scroggs, translating arsenokoitai as "child molesters". Of course, fundamentalists ignore that bible translation [as well as Phillips (1958), Jerusalem Bible (French -1955), The Latin Vulgate, (405), etc., of which reject the homosexual interpretation] while accepting the NIV (which is unclear since it has the translation "homosexual offenders").
Note: The Dutch NBG translation of 1951 uses the word "schandjongens" ("maleprostitutes" in English) for malakoi and "knapenschenders" ("boy-molesters" in English) for arsenokotai.

Rembert Truluck is a Doctor of Theology from Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Louisville, KY, 1968. He was a Southern Baptist Pastor from 1953 to 1973, and a Professor of Religion at Baptist College of Charleston, SC, from1973 to 1981. Truluck is well learned in Hebrew and Greek. In his article "The Six Bible Passages Used To Condemn Homosexuals", Dr. Truluck writes, "The Greek word [arsenokoitai] translated "homosexual" does not mean homosexual! The word is obscure and uncertain."
Dr. Truluck personally wrote a letter to me, in responce to mine, in which he writes: ".... [arsenokoitai] was never translated as "homosexual" until 1946, and was a bad mistake then."
Jeramy Townsley says that "It seems clear that arsenokoites [arsenokoitai] does not refer to mutually respecting gay relationships..." Learned in Greek and Hebrew, Jeramy received a MA. in philosophy/theology from Lincoln Christian College Seminary.
".... The term appears only in contexts dealing with greed, prostitution, adultery, idolatry, and lack of self control. Although it is a rare term, its use is probably best connected with those male prostitutes who are clearly condemned in the Old Testament, and who would fit in with those temptations which drew Paul's audience toward idolatry and greed, whether they were tempted to become such prostitutes or take advantage of their services.

http://home.wanadoo.nl/inspiritus/The%20Mystery.htm
 
Upvote 0

ReformedChapin

Chapin = Guatemalan
Apr 29, 2005
7,087
357
✟33,338.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Private
The Talmud isn't the end-all, be all, and you are AT BEST quoting DOCTRINE, which doesn't necessarily represent the truth.

I quoted Scholars for my findings!
The authors of the tulmud are scholars? And liberal scholars are well known for manipulating scripture.
 
Upvote 0

davedjy

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2006
2,184
1,080
Southern California
✟33,592.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
The authors of the tulmud are scholars? And liberal scholars are well known for manipulating scripture.
You have yet to prove that any Scripture has been manipulated. The only manipulating I see is by the translators.

Read the NKJV of 1 Cor 6:9, and how it falsely translates out "malakoi", to "homosexual". That word means effeminate/soft/weak.
 
Upvote 0

Brieuse

Veteran
Mar 15, 2007
261
90
Randburg, South Africa
Visit site
✟17,003.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
You have yet to prove that any Scripture has been manipulated. The only manipulating I see is by the translators.

Read the NKJV of 1 Cor 6:9, and how it falsely translates out "malakoi", to "homosexual". That word means effeminate/soft/weak.
they even translated it to mean masturbation.
 
Upvote 0

ReformedChapin

Chapin = Guatemalan
Apr 29, 2005
7,087
357
✟33,338.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Private
You have yet to prove that any Scripture has been manipulated. The only manipulating I see is by the translators.

Read the NKJV of 1 Cor 6:9, and how it falsely translates out "malakoi", to "homosexual". That word means effeminate/soft/weak.
You have yet to prove your translation is the right one. All you do is throw random websites without real biblical evidence.

And if you want to through the word proof around all you have proven is that you want to shove your liberal agenda down our mouth.
 
Upvote 0

ReformedChapin

Chapin = Guatemalan
Apr 29, 2005
7,087
357
✟33,338.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Private
They both hold the original inerrant scripture, your point is?

No they dont and I dont see how you give them credability since you called me nuts because I believe in the inerrancy of scripture. BTW here is an article on the mistranslation of liberals and their abuse of the scriptures with the homosexuality issue...

http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=3872
 
Upvote 0

Brieuse

Veteran
Mar 15, 2007
261
90
Randburg, South Africa
Visit site
✟17,003.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

Brieuse

Veteran
Mar 15, 2007
261
90
Randburg, South Africa
Visit site
✟17,003.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
No they dont and I dont see how you give them credability since you called me nuts because I believe in the inerrancy of scripture. BTW here is an article on the mistranslation of liberals and their abuse of the scriptures with the homosexuality issue...

http://www.bible.org/page.php?page_id=3872
so what Hebrew scripture do the liberals hold then? By no means am I a liberal, but I don't go out attacking them.
 
Upvote 0
D

DMagoh

Guest
Marriage is nothing but a paper, a few sweet words and two rings. People get married for money, for heirs, for culture, and for no reason at all. Likewise, people end marriages for the same reason. The word marriage means nothing.

Sex outside of love is the only thing that is wrong. Marriage is just the paper that makes that love official. If the love doesn't exist, it means nothing. By saying "no sex outside of marriage" you're basically saying that love doesn't need to be present. I think that what matters is if the love truly exists, if it can't be questioned by anything. My love is Christian and constantly tells me that he'd give up heaven for me (not that I would ever let him). If a love is that strong, then marriage doesn't necessarily mean anything. We're still waiting, but that's because we're not physically ready more than anything.

You think you could write your thoughts and opinions down on a piece of paper, maybe even a book, that I could read and study at home. I use to read and study stuff written by the Apostle Paul, Peter, John, and people like that, but I am beginning to the see the error of my ways.
 
Upvote 0

RMDY

1 John 1:9
Apr 8, 2007
1,531
136
41
Richmond
Visit site
✟25,946.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives
I suggest some need to stop hiding behind FALSE doctrine, and accept their own true sexuality.

I suggest you humble yourself and stop accusing other Christians of being liars without backing up what you say with Scripture.
 
Upvote 0