Secret Service lead prepared to testify allegation against Trump NOT TRUE

[Valletta]

• Bobby Engel, the lead agent on Trump's detail, and the presidential driver at the time are prepared to testify under oath to the committee that Hutchinson's testimony is incorrect, according to multiple news outlets
• 'I'm the effing president, take me to the Capitol now,' Cassidy Hutchinson, Mark Meadows' top aide, said Trump ordered
• 'Sir, you need to take your hand off the steering wheel. We're going back to the West Wing, we're not going to the Capitol,' Hutchinson was told Secret Service agent Robert Engel said
• 'Mr. Trump then used his free hand to lunge towards Bobby Engel,' Hutchinson recalled
• Hutchinson was revealed to be the surprise witness for Tuesday's last-minute January 6 hearing

Secret Service prepared to testify under oath that Trump did NOT grab the steering wheel | Daily Mail Online

 

[disciple Clint]

• 
  
  
  • Bobby Engel, the lead agent on Trump's detail, and the presidential driver at the time are prepared to testify under oath to the committee that Hutchinson's testimony is incorrect, according to multiple news outlets
  • 'I'm the effing president, take me to the Capitol now,' Cassidy Hutchinson, Mark Meadows' top aide, said Trump ordered
  • 'Sir, you need to take your hand off the steering wheel. We're going back to the West Wing, we're not going to the Capitol,' Hutchinson was told Secret Service agent Robert Engel said
  • 'Mr. Trump then used his free hand to lunge towards Bobby Engel,' Hutchinson recalled
  • Hutchinson was revealed to be the surprise witness for Tuesday's last-minute January 6 hearing

Secret Service prepared to testify under oath that Trump did NOT grab the steering wheel | Daily Mail Online

The problem is that almost no one wants the truth.

 

[SimplyMe]

So news outlets and an unnamed source is dependable in this case? Odd how that works for you two.

From the Tweets linked, two Twitter accounts claim "a source" told them this -- and it apparently has been reported in various news publications. Again, we are now supposed to believe unnamed sources?

As for this particular story, if you had listened to her testimony today, she stated this is one story she did not personally witness, so she could not vouch that it was completely true (unlike the other stories where she was present and personally witnessed the things she testified of). I don't think it particularly matters if this story is true, particularly when you look at the rest of her testimony and how much of it has been confirmed in the testimony of other witnesses.

 

[disciple Clint]

So news outlets and an unnamed source is dependable in this case? Odd how that works for you two.

From the Tweets linked, two Twitter accounts claim "a source" told them this -- and it apparently has been reported in various news publications. Again, we are now supposed to believe unnamed sources?

As for this particular story, if you had listened to her testimony today, she stated this is one story she did not personally witness, so she could not vouch that it was completely true (unlike the other stories where she was present and personally witnessed the things she testified of). I don't think it particularly matters if this story is true, particularly when you look at the rest of her testimony and how much of it has been confirmed in the testimony of other witnesses.

I disagree it matters very much if she is testifying to things she has no actual knowledge of it casts doubt on the reliability of her entire testimony and considering the fact that there is no cross examination I find it very problematic additionally I find it objectionable that such testimony would be accepted by the committee, it speaks to the desire of the committee to paint a picture regardless of the truthfulness of that picture. AND it appears that eye witnesses are available to testify that the event or events she described did not in fact happen at all, that makes her a very unreliable witness.

 

[Valletta]

So news outlets and an unnamed source is dependable in this case? Odd how that works for you two.

From the Tweets linked, two Twitter accounts claim "a source" told them this -- and it apparently has been reported in various news publications. Again, we are now supposed to believe unnamed sources?

As for this particular story, if you had listened to her testimony today, she stated this is one story she did not personally witness, so she could not vouch that it was completely true (unlike the other stories where she was present and personally witnessed the things she testified of). I don't think it particularly matters if this story is true, particularly when you look at the rest of her testimony and how much of it has been confirmed in the testimony of other witnesses.

I did hear her say that, the attorneys who are members of this inquisition know very well that is hearsay but they let her go ahead. Why present such accusations if it doesn't matter if the accusations are true?
If she is lying, and either she or the Secret Service people are lying, then that is important because if she is lying it discredits the rest of her information. Our nation went through this with the previous Russia/Trump hoaxes, the hoaxes were based on supposedly verified information that was never verified.

 

[GreatLakes4Ever]

• 
  
  
  • Bobby Engel, the lead agent on Trump's detail, and the presidential driver at the time are prepared to testify under oath to the committee that Hutchinson's testimony is incorrect, according to multiple news outlets
  • 'I'm the effing president, take me to the Capitol now,' Cassidy Hutchinson, Mark Meadows' top aide, said Trump ordered
  • 'Sir, you need to take your hand off the steering wheel. We're going back to the West Wing, we're not going to the Capitol,' Hutchinson was told Secret Service agent Robert Engel said
  • 'Mr. Trump then used his free hand to lunge towards Bobby Engel,' Hutchinson recalled
  • Hutchinson was revealed to be the surprise witness for Tuesday's last-minute January 6 hearing

Secret Service prepared to testify under oath that Trump did NOT grab the steering wheel | Daily Mail Online

Good, I’d love testimony under oath from every person in that car at the time.

 

[Quasiblogo]

Watching Spain’s RTVE.ES today, the announcer began with, “Trumps’s horizon darkens…”, citing what this one Jan. 6 interviewee said—with no mention that there are agent’s willing to refute.

 

[durangodawood]

I disagree it matters very much if she is testifying to things she has no actual knowledge of it casts doubt on the reliability of her entire testimony and considering the fact that there is no cross examination I find it very problematic additionally I find it objectionable that such testimony would be accepted by the committee, it speaks to the desire of the committee to paint a picture regardless of the truthfulness of that picture. AND it appears that eye witnesses are available to testify that the event or events she described did not in fact happen at all, that makes her a very unreliable witness.

I thought she was very clear about what she personally witnessed (most of it) vs what she was told. There was no attempt to conflate the two in her testimony.

 

[disciple Clint]

I thought she was very clear about what she personally witnessed (most of it) vs what she was told. There was no attempt to conflate the two in her testimony.

Now there seems to be even more doubt about her testimony.
Former White House lawyer claims Cassidy Hutchinson did not write note to Trump on Jan. 6: Report

 

[wing2000]

I thought she was very clear about what she personally witnessed (most of it) vs what she was told. There was no attempt to conflate the two in her testimony.

Of course she was clear.

But one would have to actually watch her testimony....as opposed to posting headlines from the Daily Mail.....

 

[wing2000]

And the take away from that portion of her testimony:

The POTUS had a strong desire to go to the Capitol on January 6th. Or maybe the op is suggesting otherwise?