Uncle Siggy
Promulgator of Annoying Tidbits of Information
That's why Socialism was created, to stop that from happening...
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Here A novel solution, let humans beings be human beings, if Darwinism is true, like some think, let's take it to its logical conclusion, eventually the strongest will survive, and evolve.
You know I'm kinda curious as to why the article failed to mention pollution and overfishing as reasons the reefs could be dying off???
We have to make the sacrifices, but not the third world, gotcha! Here A novel solution, let humans beings be human beings, if Darwinism is true, like some think, let's take it to its logical conclusion, eventually the strongest will survive, and evolve.
We have to make the sacrifices, but not the third world, gotcha!.
We have to make the sacrifices, but not the third world, gotcha!
Here A novel solution, let humans beings be human beings, if Darwinism is true, like some think, let's take it to its logical conclusion, eventually the strongest will survive, and evolve.
Then put to test, instead of promoting it, then, walking it back when humans are about to die off. half the folks in the politics forum has a less than positive view of humans anyways, why not let the rats, and mice survive, cockroaches too, since they survive a nuclear blast.If you're going to try and be a clever boy, at least get your facts straight. Evolution is about the "most fit" not the strongest. In many situations, rats and mice would be more fit than humans or bears for example.
Yes laziness, and selfishness is sad, however to say it just because of stock dividends is misleading, or do you think your opponents are inherently evil? I thought the new rage by the Scientific & atheistic crowd is realitivism?It's not about sacrifices, it's about evolving socially and economically. When the car was invented do you think it was an easy thing transitioning from a society that depended on animal labor to a society that utilized the combustion engine?
And do you think everyone managed the switch simultaneously or were some nations better suited to go first and then the rest followed???
The 3rd world is not equivalent to the 1st world socially or economically or technologically. Do I really have to make this point? So it is impossible for them to be on the same time scale as us. 1st world got computers in the 1990s, 3rd world got them 20 years later. 1st world got cell phones in the 90s, 3rd world got them 20 years later...
Same thing with a new energy resource and paradigm.
I don't think you understand the history of man at all. Part of being human is having the ability to adapt to one's surroundings. On every corner of the planet, humans have been able to adapt and change to accomplish the task of survival.
What I feel that you are failing to grasp is that severe environmental impacts like the world's coral reefs dying have a "potential" to lead to catastrophic effects to the entire world. The world's biosphere is so complex that our current level of science doesn't quite know how to model it. We are all linked together and something like the coral reefs all dying off in a short period of time (decades not centuries) is something that literally could lead to a cascade effect that fundamentally hurts every living organism on the planet.
So yeah, this is a big deal.
I dunno, maybe we old crusty types just don't care because we'll be dead in 20, 30, or 40 years and we don't care what mess we leave our children and grandchildren...
So we lie to ourselves, downplay it, tell ourselves that it is just "scaremongering" so we can go on earning stock dividends or not have to change our standards of living and way of life.
Just kick that can down the road and let our grandchildren and their grandchildren deal with the consequences of our laziness and selfishness
Then put to test, instead of promoting it, then, walking it back when humans are about to die off. half the folks in the politics forum has a less than positive view of humans anyways, why not let the rats, and mice survive, cockroaches too, since they survive a nuclear blast.
My point is put evolution to its logical conclusion, if the planet is going to die, then let's see who the fittest to survive, instead of preach it, then walk it back with some social justice feel good stuff, when the going gets tough.Huh? What the heck are you babbling about?
Yes laziness, and selfishness is sad, however to say it just because of stock dividends is misleading, or do you think your opponents are inherently evil?
...I thought the new rage by the Scientific & atheistic crowd is realitivism?
My point is put evolution to its logical conclusion, if the planet is going to die, then let's see who the fittest to survive, instead of preach it, then walk it back with some social justice feel good stuff, when the going gets tough.
Or we could try to take care of the planet. Like God should or would want us too.My point is put evolution to its logical conclusion, if the planet is going to die, then let's see who the fittest to survive, instead of preach it, then walk it back with some social justice feel good stuff, when the going gets tough.
Evidence?
My point is put evolution to its logical conclusion
No. It was human hubris and the ignorant idea that we can do whatever we want and, well God made this world and he's in control, so we just do whatever and whatever happens happens!"Wasn't it science that got us into this environmental degradation fix in the first place?
When the doctor's come in with a positive test result for prostrate cancer and provides it, do you rebut with "Pffft. You're just trying to get me to eat healthier. I don't really have cancer"? Because that is not a proper response to negative news.more global warming scaremongering by scientists with a agenda.
Science really likes to support their hypotheses with evidence instead of "but what IF!!". Rising ocean temps are the biggest threat to coral reefs.You know I'm kinda curious as to why the article failed to mention pollution and overfishing as reasons the reefs could be dying off???
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic lol. If you are, it's amusing satire, if you're serious, I can point to some times in history where various religions did hold sway over most parts of the world, and the outcome wasn't great.I bet if we had worldwide prayer, we could do just about anything.
Or we could try to take care of the planet. Like God should or would want us too.
Science has waged a culture war on religion for years on behalf of either Libertinism or Social Liberalism, now they us to cooperate, no thanks amigo!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?